Papers of the Winthrop Family, Volume 3Note: you've followed an index reference to a note that, due to changes between the print and digital editions, may no longer be on page 298. Please look at all notes at the end of the document or documents on page 298.
1636-09
The frequent experience of your loving eare ready and open toward me (in what your Conscience hath permitted) as allso of that excellent spirit of wisedome and prudence wherewith the Father of Lights hath endued you, embolden me to request a word of private advise with the soonest Convenience, if it may be, by this Messenger.
The Condicion of my selfe and those few families here planting with me, you know full well: We haue no Pattent: nor doth the face of Magistracie suite with our present Condicion: Hietherto, the Masters of Families haue ordinarily mett once a fortnight and consulted about our common peace, watch, and planting; and mutuall Consent hath finished all matters with speede and peace.
Now of late some young men single persons (of whome we had much neede) being admitted to freedome of Inhabitation, and promising to subiect to the Orders made by the Consent of the Howseholders, are discontented with their estate, and seeke the Freedome of Vote allso, and aequalitie etc.
297Beside, our dangers (in the midst of these dens of Lyons) now especially, call vpon vs to be Compact in a Civill way and power.
I haue therefore had thoughts of propounding to my neighbours a double subscription, concerning which I shall humbly craue your helpe.
The first concerning our selues, the m
We whose names are here vnder written, late Inhabitants of the Massachusetts (vpon occasion of some difference of Conscience) being permitted to depart from the Limits of that Pattent, vnder the which we came over into these parts, and being cast by the Providence of the God of Heaven, remote from others of our Countriemen amongst the Barbarous in this towne of New Providence, doe with free and ioynt Consent promise each vnto other, that, for our common peace and wellfare (vntill we heare further of the Kings royall pleasure concerning our selues) we will from time to time subiect our selues in Actiue or passiue Obedience to such Orders and Agreements, as shall be made by the greater number of the present Howseholders, and such as shall be hereafter admitted by their Consent into the same Priviledge and Covenant in our ordinarie meeting. In witnes whereof we herevnto subscribe etc.
Concerning those few young men, and any who shall hereafter (by your favourable Connivence) desire to plant with vs: this
We whose names are here vnder written being desirous to inhabite in this Towne of New Providence, doe promise to subiect our selues in actiue or passiue Obedience to such Orders and Agreements as shall be made from time to time, by the greater number of the present Howseholders of this Towne, and such whome they shall admit into the same fellowship and priviledge. In witnes whereof etc.
Hietherto we chose one (named the officer,) to call the meeting at the appointed Time: now it is desird by some of vs that the Howseholders by Course performe that worcke, as allso gather Votes and see the watch goe on etc.
I haue not yet mencioned these things to my neighbours but shall as I see Cause vpon your lo
As allso, since the place I haue purchased 2ly at mine owne charge and engagements the inhabitants paying, (by Consent) 30s piece as they come vntill my Charge be out for their particular Lots: and 3rdly, that I never made any other Covenant with any person, but that if I got a place he should plant there with me: my quaere is this.
Whither I may not lawfully desire this of my neighbours, that as I freely subiect my selfe to Common Consent and shall not bring in any person into the Towne without their Consent: so allso that against my Consent no person be Violently brought in and receaved.
298I desire not to sleepe in securitie and dreame of a Nest which no hand can reach. I cannot but expect changes, and the change of the last Enemie Death, yet dare I not despise a Libertie, which the Lord seemeth to offer me, if for mine owne or others Peace: and therefore haue I bene thus bold to present my thoughts vnto you.
The Pequts heare of your preparations etc. and comfort them selues in this that a witch amongst them will sinck the pinnaces by diving vnder water and making holes etc. as allso that they shall now enrich themselues with store of guns but I hope their dreames (through the mercie of the Lord) shall vanish, and the Devill and his lying Sorcerers shall be confounded.
You may
W. 2. 96; 4
Collections
, VI. 186–188.
1636-09-09
Whereas abowte 12 moneth synce came forthe a boocke in defence of the orthodoxall doctrine of the church of Englande against Sabbatarian noveltie,2 whereat many began secretly to murmure, for that it was bytter and dyd overthrowe the tenents of the church of England in that poynte which none durste publickly oppose, bycawse many defended it so earnestly at the lengthe abowte whitsontyde laste there was scattered abroade a very lytle treatise of 16 leaves in 4to entyteled a briefe awnswere to a late treatise of the Sabbath daye, digested dialogue wyse betweene 2 divines A and B, withowte the name of any awthor.3
These 2 divines meetinge and conferringe of this boocke, the one of them thowghte it a verye dangerous boocke to the awthor, if it mighte be well ex299amined before competente judges bycawse as he sayeth it overthroweth the doctryne of the church of England in the poynte of the Sabbathe for the very tytle is A defense of the Orthodoxal doctrine of the church of Englande agaynst Sab batarian Noueltye. These divine shewe that the boocke is dedicated to the Archbishop of Cantthat he wyll neuer suffer therein the leaste innouation. So agayne one of them alledgeth there adversary is a greate Scholler deepely learned a Reu
Now to shewe how the doctryne of the church of England is overthrowne in this poynte of the Sabbath these divines say that the doctrine of the church of Englande concerninge the Sabbath is moste cleerely sett downe in the boocke of homylyes vnto which all mynisters do subscribe, and by 39 art
The divine sayeth that the 4 com
The adversary sayeth the particular forme and circumstances of restinge are prescribed vnto vs by the precepts of the church our Spirituall actions are tawghte by the Evangelicall lawe; our modification, limitation in respecte of rytes, forme, place, duration, gesture, habytt etc. are prescribed by the lawe of the church and so pag. 270: It was in the free election of the church to appoynte what day or dayes or tymes shee thowghte good for religeous dutyes, etc.
The devines saye that the 4 com
This the divines say is contrary to the homylies even in terminis which saye by the 4 com
But the divine leavinge to presse the adversary any more with auctorytie of the church observeth these reasons and growndes owte of the woords of the commandimente. Remember the Sabboth daye to keepe it holy, which woords are the very morall substance of the 4 Com
Agayne it teacheth vs what daye in the weeke, the Sabbathe daye is, to wytt, the Sabbothe day of the lorde thie God: that day in the weeke wherein the Lorde our God resteth muste be our Sabbath day: So that as the com
The Reasons ar these 1 bycawse the com
Agayne the divines affirme thay have harde the Adversary say in open courte, that a man mighte be iustefyed to daye and condemned to morowe. That there is no sanctification of the Sabbath but reste, reste only. And bycawse the dyvines woolde not be taxed of a pryvate interpretation of the homely as a factious Sabbatarian noveliste enclined to the disciplinarian faction, he sheweth the Judgemente and vnderstandinge of others which do agree in the same interpretation of the doctrine of our church layed downe in the homylie as Mr. Hooker and Dr. Andrewes from whose woorkes thay alledge sondry playne places withowte exception, so that thay conclude that the lords daye is come in place of the olde Sabbathe daye, and so is become our Sabbathe daye, and by necessary consequence grownded vpon the 4 com
And bycawse there is a greate clamor of late for applienge the name of the Sabbothe to the lords daye thay proove it may be so called by these Reasons. 1. Becawse it is our Reste daye. 2. The App
And so thay showe, that in the sayde homyly, it is called the Sabbathe daye 10 tymes, in one other homylie 8 tymes, and in a 3 homely 2 tymes: And in King James his proclamation 7 of May 1603, twyce.
Then thay come to all recreations on the Sabbath daye, which thay proove vnlawefull, by lawes domesticke, by the Imperiall lawes, by the Edictes and constitutions of famous princes, comon lawes and cyvill lawes, and by all the reformed churches, thowghe the adversary nullefyes them, for no true churches, bycawse thay have no prelates, to putt them in order and governe them, who all calle the Lords daye the Sabbathe daye, for the due sanctification whereof, they pleade moste earnestly and zealouslye.
In May laste came forthe a boocke allowed by auctA Coale from the Altar,5 or an awnswere to a lettre not longe synce wrytten to the vicar of Grantham against the placinge of the ComCoale from the Alter is an notable flatterer of the Courte one Dr. Helyn, one that hathe mooche for abrogatinge the olde syncerytie of the Sabbathe.
The Doctor at the firste enterance gathereth that this lettre to the vicar of Gr
Then he discendeth to the 3 particulars wherein the vicar of Gran
He sheweth that the papistes calles the com
He calleth hym an ex
He concludeth that the vicar of Gran
Laste of all he alledgeth that in a case of St. Gregoryes church nexte St. Pauls London his sacred ma
And further sayeth that the com
I muste nowe entreate you to goe backe agayne to calle to mynde our Ep
By this breviate heere formerly abstracted you may see how the Lords day is kepte heere. Maysters of famylies complayne exceedingly thay cannot contayne there servantes from excursions into all prophane sportes and pastimes on the lords daye; wee haue Judgements daylye vpon suche occasions, but no man regardeth them. It hathe byn well observed this laste Springe heere was very whotte and drye euen in seede tyme and so contynewed of longe tyme that the grasse was so burned vp, that at our vsuall hayseele wee had lytle or no grasse to cutt or to feede our catle. at laste God sente vs rayne, but it was so immoderate and vehimente even in our harvest with suche stronge blastes and stormes layenge moste of the come flatte vpon the grownde, that not halfe of the corne which came vp coolde be reaped, and that which was reaped is so growne that many feare but doe not knowe what maye heereof prove and ensewe. The plague and infection is come to 536 this laste weeke at London. The Kinge hathe byn very carefull to prevente the infection from dispersenge, 306for which cawse he adiourned parte of laste Trynitie tearme as from the second retorne called octavis trinitatis, vntill tres trinitatis then next followenge, at Cambrydge no publicke Commencemente, no Barthollmew fayer at London, or our lady fayer in Sowthewoorke, no Styrbrydge fayer, no Ely fayer etc. In all these calamyties wee never wente to God publickly by fastinge and prayer, which was deemed as hatefull as conventicles the frute of the vestry elders there vestry doctryne and the disciplinarian faction; yett at the lengthe vpon the private prayers and fastes of many of Gods deere Servants it pleased the lorde to sende suche an abundante frutefull Mihell Sprynge to the full supply of what so euer was wantynge in our soommer sp
I praye you remember the plott or mappe of N. E.
W. 2. 154; 4
Collections
, VI. 398–409. For Ryece, see Winthrop Papers, I. 357,
n. 35.
Francis White, A Treatise of the Sabbath-Day. Containing, A Defence of the Orthodoxall Doctrine of the Church of England, against Sabbatarian-Novelty (London, 1635).
Richard Byfield, The Lords Day, the Sabbath Day. Or, A Briefe Answer to Some Materiall Passages, in a Late Treatise of the Sabbath-Day: Digested Dialogue-Wise betweene Two Divines A. and B. (London, 1636). This has also been attributed to William Prynne.
Edmund Reeve, The Communion Booke Catechisme Expounded (London, 1635).
Peter Heylyn, A Coale from the Altar (London, 1636).
From a comparison of the handwriting of this letter and that of letters dated January 17, 1636/37 (pages 346–348, below), and April 19, 1637 (page 394, below), it is clear that Lawrence Browne is a pseudonym for Robert Ryece. Cf. Ryece’s letters to Winthrop with the signature Thomas Smythe, March 1, 1636/37 (pages 363–365, below), and March 10, 1636/37 (pages 371–375, below). Ryece’s use of a pseudonym is doubtless to be explained by the nature of his subject matter.