Papers of John Adams, volume 21
Doctr. Edwards of Philada. will be so obliging as to take charge of this
Letter. I regret that he & mrs. Edwards
leave this place so soon—1
You will find him a Gentleman of extensive Information.— He has visited the
greater part of this Kingdom, and paid particular attention to the Husbandry
of it.— Permit me to introduce him to You.
I have heard, and wish it may be true, that your Son is appointed to Holland. He will there meet with many of your friends.
His Talents, Education, & attention to Business
promise Utility to his Country, Honor to himself, and Satisfaction to
You—That all these Prospects may be realized is the sincere wish of / Dear
Sir / your most obt. & h’ble Servt.
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams
Esqr.”; docketed by JA:
“John Jay 1794.”
Former Continental Army surgeon Enoch Edwards
(1751–1802), of Philadelphia, was an associate justice of the Penn.
Court of Common Pleas. With his wife, Frances Gordon Edwards
(1761–1851), he was on a three-year tour of Great Britain and France
(Washington, Papers, Retirement Series
, 1:129,
130; Jefferson, Papers
, 33:501).
thof July 1794.
Doctor Edwards the bearer of this letter, is a native of
Pennsylvania, late a member of the legislature—and Convention of that
Commonwealth and one of the district Judges. He came to Europe with such
good letters of introduction—as few of our citizens bring—: his pursuits
have led him to traverse every part of this Island and to cultivate an
acquaintance with the territorial Aristocracy of it: he was also in Holland
& Flanders this Spring—and returns to Pennsylvania by the way of Boston
from laudable motives of curiosity. He is ambitious of making your
acquaintance. Mrs Edwards and an english young
Lady, Miss Clarkson accompany him—& I presume to be his master of
ceremonies to You—by giving him this letter of introduction
For many months past I have purposely abstain’d from
writing—from prudential motives.1 Nor am I quite certain that
silence is not now the safest course. Besides as Mr Jay is your correspondent you cannot want the most authentic
accounts. Yet I have formerly been in such communicative habits with You,
and I know you are so 298
desirous of knowing the truth that I am tempted to be once more
loquacious.
One year is but just elapsed—since the party of Brissot
in the convention agreed with the moderate royalists in the southern
provinces of France—to surrender Toulon to their foes abroad sooner than
submit to the party of the Mountain at home: in the month of July
1793—upwards of twenty departments adhered to Brissot and detested his
antagonists. But no sooner was it made manifest that this was the case
namely that Toulon was surrenderd by ’em—than a vast majority of the people
of those very provinces—(from wrath and indignation at such an atrocious
piece of treachery)—sided immediately with the
leaders of the Mountain stifled their recent political predilections—and
swore vengeance, equally, against the British and the Brissotines— The
Leaders of the Mountain wanted but this defection to establish the power
they had seiz’d. Their projects instantly became vast—and they stuck at
nothing that coud impede their execution. The committees of public welfare
and safety soon (in fact and effect) became the most puissant
cabinet-counsel—that the world in any age of it has ever witnessed; their
measures were as certainly supported by the residue of the Convention—as
Mr Pitt’s are in both houses here. Their
most sagacious measure was to declare the late democratic constitution,
which had been generally accepted & ratified by the people—calculated
only for times of peace—and to get what they named a revolutionary
government (the powers of which centred chiefly in themselves) sanction’d in
lieu of it during the war. It was done;— The jacobine club of Paris was
managed and the Revolutionary Tribunal establish’d. Soon fell all or most of
the heads of the leaders, civil and military, as well of the Brissotines as
of the Constituents that had marshald themselves under La Fayette. The next
step was, fas vel nefas, to supply the treasury with an abundance of the
precious metals.— And by forced loans—by stripping the churches—by
decapitating the farmers general & others—or by voluntary offerings—this
was soon atchieved: Thirty millions sterling in
gold silver and precious stones—they are known to have accumulated:—
Meanwhile giving currency to & establishing the credit of assignats
became the test of civism; nobody resisted—every body concur’d—now and then
a banker’s head—off—stimulated the civism of
the residue of that body who had heads on.
Their next great measure was to form founderies for casting—cannon—and
manufactories for muskets & bayonets and powder. In this they soon
succeeded. For many months past there have been cast at least one hundred
299 pieces of brass ordnance a month and
manufactur’d one thousand muskets per diem. Meanwhile every male capable of
bearing arms—was drill’d, and as fast as possible, equip’d. In a short time
they were class’d— In a short time after this the youth of the first
requisition were ordered to be in readiness to take the field [. . .] become
incorporated with the old soldiers. Of this first requisition consisting of
youth from 18 to 25—the unmarried—only were
actually incorporated. And so exactly was this rigourous law obey’d that no
money coud procure the acceptance of a single substitute—and young frenchmen
are now serving, chearfully, in flanders in the ranks who possess property
to the amount of millions of livres—
It became a maxim with the Committee that the soldiers shou’d be well-fed, clad and equipd—on the frontiers—even if their fellow-citizens famish’d in the interior, and went stark naked. Another maxim was—to overwhelm their foes by multitude—and never to make an attack till they were strong enough to make the defeat of one army if that event shoud happen—a certain prelude of victory to the next that instantly succeeded them.— It must be ownd that its success has well-justified the measure. Besides this practice of being always prepard to follow up victory—and render eventual defeat almost impossible—they introduced a new plan for governing and directing their armies. The original design whether of a single attack, or combin’d battles,—was formed in Paris by a board of old experienced officers—entrusted to be communicated to the commanders in the field by some member of the convention: this member with a colleague saw every thing furnish’d on the spot that was necessary—and the acting general had only to fulfil a positive command. Not a General has lost his head—tho’ several have lost battles since this project was pursued. And thus the chief commanders of the french armies, unperplex’d by aught relating to their supply or by any responsibility for the soundness of any military project—have had little to do beside skilfully directing the storm of battle in conformity to orders the most precise and positive. Ever since the adoption of this system treachery or cowardice in any of the generals has been rendered either nugatory or impossible. Nor have I heard of a single accusation of the sort The present rulers in France . . .2 considering themselves in irreconcileable hostility to most of the crownd heads in Europe . . . have thus drawn the sword and thrown away the Scabbord.
[Con]sidering the entire territory of France as one
besieged fortress and the besiegers—combin’d europe . . . finding a numerous
and warlike people electrified by all the raging passions incident to 300 the ferventest fever of civil strife
and the hottest flame of patriotic enthusiasm—willing to be guided by
leæders of any school but the old—the leaders
of the mountain-party in the convention . . . assumed the Government of a
Volcanic democracy. Far from checking the fury of its eruption—they fed it
with fresh fuel; and began their operation by digging deep channels—in which
it wou’d pursue its flaming course to overwhelm all that might oppose it.
And they have overwhelm’d them in every
quarter. The defeat of the Duke of York, near Dunkirk in September
last, was soon follow’d by the capture & destruction of Lyons—the
pitch’d battle of twenty Days on the Rhine, terminating in the defeat of
Warmsen & forcing the combin’d armies across the Rhine—the extermination
of one hundred thousand royalists in the fields of La Vendee the defeat of
Prince Saxe Cobourg near Maubege by Jourdain—and finally the recapture of
Toulon.3 That recapture
was a most fatal stroke to Britain: The attack was so sudden unexpected and
successful . . . that two or three most important naval
arsenals—(particularly one of Masts which Hood had form’d—and another of
season’d shiptimber) together with ten sail of
the line at least—and all the stone slips and
docks ready for buïlding, were left entire. From that moment the french
rulers resolved to become formidable by sea. A considerable part of their
attention was immediately turn’d to this object. And notwithstanding the
signal victory of Lord Howe in June last—no man who does not shut his eyes
wilfully can help observing the probability that they must as things now go
on, become the strongest power on the ocean. Since the arrival of the fleet
from America—for the safety of which they woud have bargain’d for the loss
it cost those of the british, belonging to his detachment . . . General
Claufayt, having been beaten in seven battles—Ostend not being tenable for
the allies has been evacuated. By some error or oversight the garrison of
Nieuport in its vicinity consisting of about two thousand men—was not
evacuated—and has since been taken by the french after standing a smart
siege. The Duke of York, and the army he commands, have fortunately made
good their retreat into Ductch Brabant are now it is said safe between Breda
and Bergen up Zoom, and if they cannot defend Holland may be soon expected
home. To crown the disasters of the allies and the victories of the french .
. . an account is just arrived by Lord Malmsbury4 from the continent . . . that the
french on the Rhine—after the most furious attacks of several days
continuance—have totally defeated and again driven across the Rhine, the
Prussian and austrian armies consisting of one hundred thousand of the 301 best troops in Europe. General
Mollendorf’s army suffered the most severely—losing their artillery and
baggage—and an immense number of well-disciplin’d Prussians. This General
was of the old military school—and a favourite commander you know under the
late Frederick.5
The battle of Fleurus excited such an alarm here, that
with other serious events, it generated a new coalition between his
brïtannic maȷ̈esty’s ministers for the time being and the Duke of Portland,
Earl Fitzwilliam Earl Spencer, Mr Windham &c
&c. This brings into executive energy, a great mass of landed property,
a group of aristocratic whigs—and a considerable body of their immediate
dependants. I believe they wou’d at this hour be very much obliged to You or
any other wise statesman who cou’d point out the system they ought to pursue
in order to preserve royalty—aristocracy—and every thing as it now is in
Britain to the entire satisfaction of the many
as well as the few. As to the United States of America, the people in power,
sooner than be brought to own faïrly—that by weak or wicked measures they
have allowd their subjects to rob us of a million—that ought to be
reimbursed— I fear they woud contrive to expend six millions more. in
chastising us out of our sturdy moderation and astonishing credulity and
good-nature. If Mr Jay actually gets payment of
our actual losses—or even an explicit promise
of future payment; I shall vote; when I get back to America this winter—for
a marble statue to be erected to his honor; with some such inscription as
this—“In memory of a republican Envoy who obtain’d restitution for property
plunder’d by the express order of a monarchic court—without resorting to the
’ultima ratio regum.’”
If I thought your were not quite tir’d I wou’d just add to the facts I have now mention’d—a word respecting poor Poland. Its destiny depends upon a single contingency; If the leaders of the revolution can make the peasantry—believe that each of them will become a freeman—and a richer man, in consequence of establishing the Revolution—in spite of Russia and Prussia it will be establish’d: if not—not. All that is wanted at present, is immediate enthusiasm in the many—if the mass be electrified—this summer they wïll give a sufficient shock to ensure success—because France will stimulate Turkey: and Sweden & Denmark already sympathise with them: In a word there is now almost a certainty that the trade of Kïng & Priest is in a deep decay, and that the many will no longer be a prey to the few, in Europe. In contemplating such an amelioration of the condition of man—I am full of regret that the means must be strong & bloody: 302 but I fear it is in the order of providence that the best blessings of the great family of man—must never be attain’d or secured but at the highest price.
For myself—and of myself—I say little now—the rather because I hope to say more—and more to the purpose—when I see you next winter.
I beg my very respectful and affectionate compliments to
Mrs Adams—assuring You and her, that I am
mindful of the many civilities and kindnesses heretofore afforded by both of
You to / Your respectful / and obedt sert:
I have written this letter with such rapidity—that I fear its inaccuracies are many: but time is not allow’d me to copy it: Upon most of the facts of it I think You may rely.
RC (Adams Papers). Some loss of text due to a torn manuscript.
Cutting last wrote to JA in Aug. 1790 (vol. 20:404–405).
Ellipses here and below in MS.
Cutting noted the rise of radical Jacobins known as the “party of the Mountain,” or Montagnards, who sat on the highest benches of the National Convention and vied bitterly with the Girondins for power. Cutting then shifted the spotlight away from political affairs in Paris to recount the atrocities committed since 1793 in Brittany, La Vendée, and Lyons, all regional incubators of counterrevolutionary dissent and places where the Jacobins also focused their retaliatory violence. An intermittent civil war ruptured La Vendée, in western France, from 1793 to 1800. The National Convention retaliated for the violence in La Vendée and elsewhere by drowning barge loads of people in the Loire River. For the struggle in Toulon and its impact, see Tench Coxe's 11 Nov. 1793 letter, and note 1, above, and JQA’s 27 June 1795 letter, and note 5, below.
By 1794 France’s main mode of diplomacy was making
war, and new external threats quickly multiplied. French commanders Jean
Baptiste Jourdan and Lazare Carnot held off an Austrian-Dutch army, led
by Friedrich Josias, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, in the Battle of
Wattignies of 15–16 Oct. 1793. Their decisive win ensured that the key
northeastern fortress of Maubeuge—and thus the main path to
Paris—remained in French control. Jourdan’s army again bested the
prince’s forces at the Battle of Fleurus in Belgium on 26 June 1794,
leading to the French annexation of the Austrian Netherlands. For the
pivotal clash of British and French forces during the 13 June – 28 July
1793 siege of Valenciennes, see Descriptive List of Illustrations,
No. 6, above. The Anglo-French war continued, with Rear Adm. Lord Samuel
Hood and British forces aiding a key uprising in Corsica and sparring
with the French Navy, led by Adm. Louis Thomas Villaret-Joyeuse. They
secured the French garrisons of Bastia, Calvi, and San Fiorenzo by 10
Aug. 1794 (Bosher, French Rev.
, p. 186, 189–190;
AFC
, 10:257;
Cambridge Modern
Hist.
, 8:432; Washington, Papers,
Presidential Series
, 15:221; Sir John Fortescue, A History of the British Army, 13 vols.,
London, 1899–1930, 4:179, 184, 191, 194; Esdaile, Wars of the
French Revolution
, p. 108, 125).
Sir James Harris, 1st Earl of Malmesbury, served variously as the British minister to Spain, Prussia, Russia, and the Netherlands (vol. 19:165).
Wichard Joachim Heinrich von Möllendorf (1724–1816)
served under Frederick II’s command (Washington, Papers,
Confederation Series
, 3:546).