Papers of John Adams, volume 20

From John Adams to Eliphalet Fitch, 18 July 1790 Adams, John Fitch, Eliphalet
To Eliphalet Fitch
Dear Sir New York July 18. 1790

I have received the polite and obliging Letter, you did me the honour to write me, on the Seventh of May.—1 Although an intimate and frequent Correspondence with you, considering the relation between Us, and the agreable Acquaintance, I had with you in France and England would have been always agreable to me; Yet considering the different Countries and Governments in which We live, and the Avocations of Business, which demand the Attention of both of Us, I never expected more Intercourse than there has been.—

Your Countrymen, I dare say, would be very happy to see you in North America; and none of them more than myself: Yet considering the importance of your Affairs, where You are it is a favour little to be expected. Next to the Pleasure of seeing you here, I should esteem that of frequently hearing of your health and that of your family. You were not so kind in your Letter as to let me know the Situation of your son, whom I saw in London, and in whose good fortune I interest myself very much.—2 The last of my three sons is to commence at Cambridge this Week, and like his two elder Brothers is destined to the Bar.— My only Daughter married to Col. smith of New York, has two fine Boys, and a third perhaps not far from Seeing the light of our sun.3

394

Far advanced in my fifty fifth Year, and having run through a great Variety of scenes in Life, I can very heartily join with You Mr Burke the King of Prussia and King solomon, in pronouncing all Vanité des Vanités.—

Yet I have lived to see my Country free and prosperous, rapidly Advancing to Wealth and Grandeur, after having seen her in great danger and deep Distress: I have lived to see, Europe become the Pupil of Harvard Colledge and the Town of Boston; and if I were Sure she would profit of her Lesson as much as this Country has done, I should think I had lived and seen enough.

Mrs Adams joins with me and all mine in most respectful Compliments to yourself, Mrs Fitch and your son: and in grateful Acknowledgments for the very handsome present in Sugar, Wine and Spirits which you had the Generosity to Send Us, and which We have received in good order.

Your Packet to the President I had the honour to present to him, with my own hand.

With great and sincere Esteem, I have / the honour to be, dear sir, your most / obedient and obliged servant

John Adams

RC (InHi:Arthur G. Mitten Coll.); internal address: “Eliphalet Fitch Esqr / Receiver General of the / Island of Jamaica.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 115.

1.

For this letter and the packet that JA presented to the president, see Fitch’s letter of 10 May, and note 1, above.

2.

JA frequently socialized with Fitch’s family, including wife Mary (ca. 1748–1808) and son Jeremiah (1778–1840), throughout his diplomatic tenure in Europe. Fitch replied on 11 March 1791 (Adams Papers) with the news that his son was an apprentice with the Jamaican law firm of Farmer & Moore (vol. 14:430; AFC , 10:33; MHS, Procs. , 50:196 [1916–1917]).

3.

AA2 gave birth to her third son, Thomas Hollis Smith, on 7 Aug. 1790 ( AFC , 9:84, 92).

To John Adams from Peter Delivet, 21 July 1790 Delivet, Peter Adams, John
From Pierre Delivet
Dear Sir— Baltimore Goal Jully 21th. 1790

The first cause that the federall Court of anapolis had on there dockett, To Judge, Since Its Erection, Was on a Process of accompt Between two french Merchents, Belonging to france & actual Subjects of his Most Christian Majesty,1 Which as I aprehend, That Court has No Right to take Cognisance of It Beeing Not only Diamatrically oposite to the Laws of france, But Contrary to the Stipulated articles Between H.M.C. King & the United States, Notwithstanding which, thay have Risolved from the french Consulatory Court of Baltimore To a Judgment Which is appeal to france; off the three Judges of the Consulatory Court that have Given Judgment, 395 two of them Are Parties in the Cause, and in order to have the Execution of there Sentencess to proceed agreable to there Minds, thay have had Recourse to the federal Court of Anapolis, Which is Well Known, to Be Contrary to the Laws of Both Nations, I therefore Conclude that the federal Court have Not Been So Circumspect in there audience as the Nature of the Case Required, & on the 7th. & 8 of may Last, in Said Court there Was So little Atention Paid to the Convention of Both Courts that I who am a Partey Conserned, was Sentensed. By the federal Court to Imprisonment, in Violation of a XII article Between the Court of france & the United States, But whether this Sentence, Proceeded from, Inatention, Ignorence, Partiality, or any other Cause, I am Not in a Sittuation to Determine But as it has been Puntually Executed, have only to inform Yours Honour, of the Cause & Effect, & Desire that You Will Extend Yours humanity & Power with the federal Court So far towards My Releasment, from this obscure and Humeliateing Goal, from whence I have the honour of adressing You, That thereby I may have an opertunity of Makeeng a Proper aplycation, for Damages Sustaind from Insult & Injustice.

Your Kind Interposition in this My time of Eligal & abusive treatment will Ever be Most Graatfully acknowledged; By Your Sinceer and Humble Servent

Delivet 2d. Lietnd: of His M C Majesty Navy

RC (Adams Papers).

1.

A consular court in Baltimore heard the dispute between French Navy lieutenant Pierre Delivet (b. ca. 1735) and a group of French merchants based in Le Havre, Rouen, and Paris. Once the judges invoked Maryland law, however, the case shifted to the federal district court in Annapolis. Delivet’s complaint was rooted in Art. 12 of the consular convention of 9 Sept. 1789, which stipulated that a French consul must adjudicate any such matter. Instead, Delivet was remanded to the Baltimore city jail in March 1790 and moved to the Annapolis prison on 6 May. He appealed to Thomas Jefferson for aid at least three times throughout the summer, additionally citing Arts. 4, 5, and 6, which outlined contractual relationships between consuls and crews. The secretary of state took action on 23 Aug., asking Maryland attorney general Richard Potts to investigate the case. Eventually freed, Delivet identified himself to James Madison in a letter of 26 May 1813 as “a frenchemen Born over 78 Year of age officer of the Royal Navy un tell the french Revolution that I Came to America and Naturalise” (Jefferson, Papers , 14:173–174, 176–177; 17:399–400; 23:273; Madison, Papers, Presidential Series , 6:347–351).