Papers of John Adams, volume 20

From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 4 April 1790 Adams, John Rush, Benjamin
To Benjamin Rush
Dear sir New York April 4. 1790

The Tories as you observe in your friendly Letter of 24 Feb. are more attached to each other; they are also, We must candidly confess, more of real Politicians.— They make to themselves more merit with the People, for the smallest services, than the Whigs are able to do for the greatest. The Arts, the Trumpetts the Puffs, are their old Instruments and they know how to employ them. The History of our Revolution will be one continued Lye from one End to the other. 305 The Essence of the whole will be that Dr Franklins electrical Rod, Smote the Earth and out Sprung General Washington. That Franklin electrifed him with his Rod—and thence forward these two conducted all the Policy Negotiations Legislation and War. 1 These underscored Lines contain the whole Fable Plot and Catastrophy. if this Letter should be preserved, and read an hundred Years hence the Reader will Say “the Envy of this J. A. could not bear to think of the Truth”! [“]He ventured to Scribble to Rush, as envious as himself, Blasphemy that he dared not Speak, when he lived. But Barkers at the sun and Moon are always Silly Curs.” But this my Friend, to be serious, is the Fate of all Ages and Nations. And there is no Resource in human nature for a Cure. Brederode did more in the Duch Revolution than William 1st. Prince of orange.2 Yet Brederode is forgotten and William the Saviour, Deliverer and Founder.— limited Monarchy is founded in Nature. No Nation can adore more than one Man at a time. it is an happy Circumstance that the Object of our Devotion is so well deserving of it. that he has Virtue so exquisite and Wisdom so consummate. There is no Citizen of America will Say, that there is in the World so fit a Man for the head of the Nation. from my Soul I think there is not. and the Question should not be who has done or suffered most, or who has been the most essential and Indispensible Cause of the Revolution, but who is best qualified to govern Us? Nations are not to Sacrifice their Future Happiness to Ideas of Historical Justice. They must consult their Own Weaknesses, Prejudices, Passions, Senses and Imaginations as well as their Reason. “La Raison n’a jamais fait grande chose.” as the K. of Prussia says in his Histoire de mon tems.3

The more Extracts you Send me from your Journals, the more will you oblige me— I beg especially a Copy of my Character. I know very well it must be a partial Panegyrick.— I will send You my Criticisms upon it. You know I have no affectation of Modesty.— My Comfort is that such vain folks as Cicero, Neckar Sir William Temple & I are never dangerous.4

If I Said in 1777 that [“]We Should never be qualified for Republican Governments till We were ambitious to be poor” I meant to express an Impossibility.— I meant then and now Say that No Nation under Heaven ever was, now is, or ever will be qualified for a Republican Government, unless you mean by these Words, equal Laws resulting from a Ballance of three Powers the Monarchical Aristocratical & Democratical. I meant more and I now repeat more explicitly, 306 that Americans are peculiarly unfit for any Republic but the Aristo-Democratical-Monarchy; because they are more Avaricious than any other Nation that ever existed the Carthaginians and Dutch not excepted. The Alieni Appetens Sui profusus5 reigns in this nation as a Body more than any other I have ever Seen.

When I went to Europe in 1778 I was full of patriotic Projects like yours of collecting Improvements in Arts Agriculture, Manufacture Commerce Litterature & science. But I Soon found my Error.— I found that my offices demanded every moment of my time and the Assistance of two or three Clerks—and that all this was not enough. I was obliged to make it a Rule never to go out of my Road for any Curiosity of any kind. J. J. Rousseau understood it very well when he Said that Ambassadors “doivent tout leur tems á cet Objet Unique, ils sont trop honnêtes gens pour voler leur Argent.[”] Emile Tom. 4. p. 361. 6 if he meant this as a Sarcasm, he was in the Wrong. I never knew one who attempted or affected Philosophy, that was good for any Thing in the Diplomatique Line—and I know that every Hour that I might have employed that Way would have been a Robbery upon the Duties of my Public Character.

Your Family pictures are charming; and the tender Piety you express for your Mother, is felt by me in all its force, as I have a Mother living in her Eighty Second Year, to whom I owe more than I can ever pay. This Mother and a Father who died 30 Years ago, two of the best People I ever knew formed the Character, which You have drawn. alass! that it is no better! I Said before that Vanity is not dangerous. a Man who has bad designs is seldom or never vain. it is such modest Rascals as Cæsar, who play tricks with Mankind. read his Commentaries—what consummate caution to conceal his Vanity! contemptu famæ, fama augebatur.7 This Tyrants and Villains always know.

Adieu Mon Ami,

John Adams

Pray can you recollect a Feast at Point no Point in the Fall of 1775 and the Company that returned with You and me in a Boat and our Conversation. I want a List of the Names of that Party who returned in the same Boat with Us to Philadelphia.

RC (ICN:Herbert R. Strauss Coll.); internal address: “Dr Rush.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 115.

1.

For JA’s reflections on Benjamin Franklin’s legacy, see his “Dialogues of the Dead” of [ca. 22 April], below. See also Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 4, above.

2.

Dutch statesman and military leader Hendrik van Brederode (1531–1568) petitioned for greater toleration of Protestants and raised troops to aid William I, Prince of Orange, in preparation for the Eighty Years’ War of 1568–1648, the revolt of the Netherlands against 307 308 Spanish rule (Biografisch Portaal van Nederland).

3.

Often attributed to Frederick II, this was one of Rush’s favorite maxims, although it did not appear in the king of Prussia’s Oeuvres Posthumes, Berlin, 1788: Reason has never done much (Rush, Letters , 1:547).

4.

JA esteemed the diplomatic work of Sir William Temple (1628–1699), the English statesman who concluded the Triple Alliance of 1668 among Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Sweden (vols. 4:336; 12:245).

5.

Greedy for another’s possessions; extravagant with one’s own.

6.

JA quoted from Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Émile; ou, De l’éducation, Amsterdam, 1762, a copy of which is in JA’s library at MB. Rousseau observed that ambassadors “spend all their time on this sole purpose, as they are too honest not to earn their pay” ( Catalogue of JA’s Library ).

7.

To act contemptuously of fame is to increase it.

From John Adams to James Lovell, 5 April 1790 Adams, John Lovell, James
To James Lovell
Dear Sir New York April 5th: 90

I am much obliged by your favor of March 20th and very apprehensive that this is not the only letter of yours unanswered. To leave your letters unanswered is in me very bad œconomy. The General is arrived here; but has as yet said nothing to me of his business.1 Doctor Craigie shall have all the aid in my power to give him, in his pursuit of justice in your affair: but I do not at present see how I can assist him: perhaps he may point out a path.

This day the question of the assumption of the State debts is to be put in the house; the majority will not be large.—

Pray how has the new government opperated upon commerce in Boston? Has it answered the expectations of the wise? Does it gain strength? or weakness? How is trade and shipbuilding & &

John Adams

LbC in CA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Hon James Lovel Esqr / Boston”; APM Reel 115.

1.

For James Warren’s compensation request, see Lovell’s letter of 20 March, and note 1, above.

To John Adams from John Quincy Adams, 5 April 1790 Adams, John Quincy Adams, John
From John Quincy Adams
Dear Sir. Newbury-Port. April 5th: 1790.

I have more than once mentioned to you, the state of retirement from political conversation in which I live, and the restraints which I am endeavouring to lay upon a disposition inclining perhaps with too much ardor, to feel interested in public occurrences. But it sometimes happens that I am accidentally witness to conversations upon these subjects; from which I collect some trifling information, 309 that I imagine might at least not be unentertaining to you. In general I have supposed that your other correspondents in this quarter would anticipate me and that I should only employ your time in reading a relation of occurrences, which would not even have with you the merit of novelty. But from some late Letters I have been led (though perhaps erroneously) to imagine your correspondents here have not been so punctual in their communications, as they have been formerly, and I have supposed I might mention some circumstances which though generally known here might not be public; at New-York.—1 It appears to me that the hostile character of our general and particular governments each against the other is increasing with accelerated rapidity; The Spirit which at the time when the constitution was adopted, it was contended would always subsist, of balancing one of these governments by the other has I think almost totally disappeared already; and the seeds of two contending factions appear to be plentifully sown. The names of federalist and antifederalist, are no longer expressive of the Sentiments which they were so lately supposed to contain; and I expect soon to hear a couple of new names, which will designate the respective friends of the National and particular Systems. The People are very evidently dividing into these two parties. What the event will be, I hardly allow myself to conjecture,

“but my soul akes, To know when two authorities are up, Neither supreme, how soon confusion May enter twixt the gap of both, and take The one by the other.”2

In point of measures, the Government of the United States has undoubtedly greatly the advantage. But while they are strengthening their hands by assuming the debts, and by making provision for the support of the public credit, the partizans of our State government are continually upon the rack of exertion, to contrive every paltry expedient to maintain their importance, and to check the operations of the Government, which they behold with terror. As they can only clamour upon subjects of importance; their active efforts are used, in appointing a premature fast, or in opposing the cession of a lighthouse.— In the last Session of our general Court the light-houses in this Commonwealth were not ceded to Congress. And the keeper of that at the entrance of Boston Harbour has been forbidden upon his peril to receive any directions or pay from the federal officers.3 But 310 the imbecillity of our Government renders all these exertions the more ridiculous: for while they endeavour to prevent the assumption of their debt, they cannot even provide for the payment of the interest upon it. And they have never yet paid for two light-houses at the entrance of this harbour, although they are so solicitous to retain them.

The History of the additional amendments to the Constitution proposed by a joint-committee of our two houses, affords further evidence of the petty arts which are used by the enemies to the national union to turn the tide of popular opinion against the national Government.4 Mr: Austin who as I have been informed had the principal agency in that affair, never expected, that any amendments would be seriously proposed to Congress by our Legislature; and there is an internal evidence in the report of the Committee, that it was intended for a declamation to the people rather than for amendments to the Constitution. They are not even pretended to be amendments but after the long common-place rhapsody, upon the dangerous tendency of the government, when we come to the articles, we find them pretended to be nothing but principles for amendments.— The Committee consisted of seven members; of whom only four were present when this report was agreed upon. Mr: Dane who drew it up was one of the absent, and it is said, afterwards declared that he should have objected to the two last articles, (perhaps the most important of the whole number) though he drafted them himself. The two other absent members utterly disclaimed the report; and the chairman, who did not vote, was equally opposed to it. Three members only agreed upon the point; and when they produced the paper in the Senate; they obtained a vote to have a certain number of copies printed. It was then dismissed without being suffered to undergo the test of an examination, and Mr: Austin I am told, made no scruple to acknowledge that he had answered his purpose.

Yet, even when opportunities are presented, where the importance of our own Government might be really increased; some other little selfish interested principle steps in, and produces measures calculated to bring it into contempt. The appointment of N. Cushing upon the bench of our Supreme Court, has certainly not tended to increase the confidence of the people in that important branch of the government: the appointment was very unpopular; and what perhaps in a political view rendered the measure the more injudicious, is that it is not his integrity but his abilities that are called in question. But personal animosity against the characters who would have added 311 dignity to that Station, the apprehension of giving offence to the late chief Justice, who it is said recommended his cousin too strongly, and the pleasure of removing a troublesome councillor, concurring together were too powerful even for antifederal principles, and produced we are told a nomination, which could be accounted for upon no other motives.— The only liberal and generous measure by which they have pursued their System has been the raising the Salaries of our Judges and I fear they would not have succeeded even in that, had not the personal interest of certain influential men, of very different principles been engaged, and assisted to promote it.— It is melancholy to observe how much even in this free Country the course of public events depends upon the private interests and Passions of individuals.

But the popularity of the general Government is, and for some time to come must continue to be disadvantageously affected, by those very exertions to support the public credit, which must eventually strengthen it so effectually. It must suffer however chiefly in the Sea-ports and among the merchants who find their interests affected by the operation of the revenue Laws. In this town and Still more in Salem there have lately been considerable clamours raised by men who have been the firmest friends to the constitution; and there is now I presume before Congress a petition from the merchants in this town, praying relief from an evil, which has excited great complaints, but which will probably be remedied without difficulty.5

Those people among us who are perpetually upon the search, for causes of complaint against the government, are cavilling at the dilatory manner with which the Congress proceed in their business.— The decision upon the subject of discrimination, has met with general approbation in the circles of company where I have heard it mentioned; and from the complexion of our news-papers, I have concluded that the public opinion of which so much was said in the debates, is here much in favour of the measure. I do not think indeed that the public opinion can always be collected from news-papers; but they are never silent upon unpopular topics of so great importance— Mr: Madison’s reputation has suffered from his conduct in that affair; and Judge Dana is the only man I have known whose character gives weight to his opinions, that has adopted those of Mr: Madison.

The report of the Secretary of the Treasury, has in general met with great approbation. I have heard it almost universally spoken of 312 with great applause. Yet I am almost ashamed to acknowledge, that I know not how justly it is admired, as I have never read it. This neglect has rather been owing to my accident than to inclination, for little as I attend to the public prints I should certainly have noticed a publication of so important a nature had I been in the way of seeing the Gazette of the United States which contains it.— I am equally ignorant of the System for the establishment of the militia; which is as much disliked as the treasurer’s report is esteemed; the most favourable judgment that I have heard passed upon it was, that however excellent it might be, it would never be submitted to by the people.—6

I know not, but that I shall incur your censure, for departing even in this instance from the line which I have prescribed to myself, and losing the lawyer in the politician; and still more for the freedom with which I have express’d myself upon public men and measures: if I should on this occasion meet with your disapprobation, I shall without difficulty observe a more prudent silence upon these subjects in future. The opinions which I have heard express’d are no evidence of the general opinion even throughout the Commonwealth; but in some instances they have been the opinions of men whose influence is great and extensive.— But if the information contained in this Letter should compensate in your mind for its tediousness, I shall from time to time continue to give you a similar supply.

In the mean time I remain, your affectionate Son.

J. Q. Adams.

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “J. Q. Adams. Ap. 5 / 1790.”

1.

In his most recent letters to JQA, JA provided advice on entering the legal profession and encouraged JQA to supply him with “Information on political Subjects . . . as it is given with that Freedom and Independence of Spirit, which I wish you always to preserve” ( AFC , 9:14, 16, 36–37).

2.

Shakespeare, Coriolanus, Act III, scene i, lines 108–112.

3.

For the oversight of local lighthouses, see William Smith’s letter of 12 June, and note 4, below.

4.

For the progress of the Bill of Rights, see James Sullivan’s letter of 2 July 1789, and note 2, above. Prior to the ending of the Mass. General Court’s session on 9 March 1790, a committee reported on the proposed amendments to the Constitution and recommended several major changes, such as refining senators’ qualifications and powers; consulting the state legislatures when establishing a national military force; and reconsidering the imposition of a direct tax. Members adjourned without taking any action on the report (Denys P. Myers, Massachusetts and the First Ten Amendments to the Constitution, Washington, D.C., 1936, p. 13, 28, 29).

5.

Salem and Newburyport, Mass., merchants asked Congress for revised revenue legislation. Their petitions, which were referred to Alexander Hamilton on 9 Feb. and 9 April, respectively, spurred congressional momentum for the Funding Act of 4 Aug. (Hamilton, Papers , 13:175).

6.

Hamilton’s first report on the public credit was partially printed in The Gazette of the United States from 16 to 27 January. Meanwhile, Gen. Henry Knox presented his plan for the reform of the national militia to the president on 18 January. George Washington forwarded it to Congress three days later. Knox divided and nationalized the existing 313 militia into three corps (advanced, main, and reserved) and suggested mandatory training for men eighteen to sixty years of age. While the federal government would organize and train the militia, the states would retain the power to appoint officers and award exemptions. Despite Knox’s effort to frame military needs within constitutional limits, the proposal stirred public fears of a standing army and Congress balked at its high cost. Knox’s plan of militia reform was tabled until 1792 (Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 5:10–15, 24–25; Saul Cornell, A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America, Oxford, 2006, p. 66–67).