Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
I received only three days ago your N: 22. dated the 6th: of December, and containing the melancholy
tidings of the death of our unhappy brother at New-York. I had been informed
of it two days 560
earlier by a letter from my excellent friend Mr:
Murray at the Hague, who had seen an account of it in a New-York
Gazette.—1 Of the
situation in which he has left his wife and children you say nothing, but I
can too readily imagine what it is— My father—I am persuaded will not
abandon them, and I myself wish to contribute as far as my ability will
admit to their necessities. Let me know something further of their
condition.
The day before your letter reached me, I had seen by
English newspapers the decisive turn of the presidential election by the unexpected vote of South-Carolina—2 That the issue was not unexpected
to me you will have found by more than one of my preceding letters.—3 The reports from America had indeed at a later period betokened the
anticipation of a different result but I had seen no fact which would induce an alteration of the conclusion my mind
had previously drawn and I was not at all disappointed at the actual
event
A much more distressing paragraph in the English prints of the same date announced that your father, by the latest accounts from Washington was ill of a fever.4
All these accounts coming within the space of twenty-four hours, did indeed summon me to the use of all the fortitude and resignation I could command.— There is no evil destitute of all consolation but an accusing conscience— I am therefore calm and composed, though not without a deep anxiety concerning my father’s health, and a fervent sympathy with the keen affliction of my family in America, and most especially of my ever loved and honoured mother— I have perhaps been culpable in suffering many months to pass without writing to her— But indeed my letters to you have been nearly as much intended for her as for yourself, and with my public correspondence which of late has been unusually active, have engross’d all the time and all the materials of writing that I could employ— For excepting your letters, I have received only one from our country since last July—6 Not a single line even from my dear mother; which I am sure must have been owing to the failure of her letters on their passage, and not to her having omitted to write.
I am glad to find that you had received so many of my
letters from Silesia, as well as some which preceded them— I have already
written you that I have no objection to your furnishing from them
contributions for Mr: Dennie’s proposed literary
undertaking—7 I most
cordially hope for the honour of our Country that this Gentleman’s 561 plan will succeed, and from the
opinion I entertain of his genius and talents, I cannot doubt but that it
will.— The annunciation of the translation of Gentz’s parallel made me
smile—8 His
characterizing the translator as a Gentleman of rank and learning is a good joke
enough.— I can be ambitious but of one designation more, and if he will but
mention me the next time as a Gentleman of
fashion, I shall consider myself fully established in the world’s
opinion as an homme comme il faut.
I have finally concluded to withdraw all the funds I had
in Holland, and remit them to America— In consequence of which I have
remitted to Mr: King in London fourteen hundred
pounds sterling, for which I have informed him I should authorize you to
draw.—9 You will
therefore do so accordingly, with attention as usual to take the best rate
of exchange that you can obtain— Charge me the usual commission, and place
the funds to the best advantage; but not in any
institution connected with the continuance of the Union.— I have
already so great a proportion of my all placed there, that unless I secure
something elsewhere, I shall stand upon melting ice— I should indeed wish
you to put all my property upon a basis firmer
than that of the federal government. In Massachusetts if possible, and on a
foundation more firm than banks or public loans— My whole future dependence
for a subsistence will now be in your hands— I trust I need not recommend it
to your assiduous and affectionate attention— Your bills upon Mr: King for the monies I empowered you to draw
last summer, have been received and paid.
Most affectionately your’s
N.B. I shall enclose this under cover to Mr: King to be forwarded to you. I have
lately sent by the way of Holland too, as well as of Hamburg— I believe
that in general, through England is the most expeditious way.— Your last
letter was sent me by Mr: King—10 It is now barely two months
old. I seldom get letters so recent by the way of Hamburg.
FC-Pr (Adams Papers); internal address:
“Thomas B. Adams Esqr:.”
In a letter to JQA of [24–27 Jan. 1801] (Adams Papers), William Vans Murray
relayed the “unpleasant news” of CA’s death, which he
learned from “3 N. york papers to 6 Decr:.”
The news was reported in the New-York
Gazette and the Commercial
Advertiser, both 1 Dec. 1800, and the Spectator, 3 December.
The London Chronicle,
4–6 Dec., reported that five of South Carolina’s eight electoral votes
were expected to go to Thomas Jefferson and predicted that he would win
the election.
JQA speculated on the likelihood of JA’s defeat in letters to TBA of 10 July, and to JA of 25 Nov., both above.
The London Morning
Chronicle and the London Courier and
Evening Gazette, both 562 25
Dec., reported the false rumor that since JA’s arrival in
Washington, D.C., he was “ill of a fever and ague,” for which see
AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 21 Nov., and note
5, above.
Edward Young, The Complaint;
or, Night Thoughts, Night III, line 63.
JQA received a 24 July letter from John
Marshall on 21 Oct. in which Marshall discussed relations between the
United States and Sweden (Marshall, Papers
,
4:188–189).
JQA to TBA, 27 Dec., for which see A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, Editorial Note, above.
For the “annunciation” of JQA’s translation of Friedrich von Gentz’s study of the American and French Revolutions, see TBA to JQA, 6 Dec. 1800, and note 3, above.
In letters to Rufus King of 24 and 31 Jan. 1801 (both CSmH:Rufus King Papers), JQA notified King of his intent to remit £1400 and then enclosed five bills of exchange in that amount, informing King that either he or TBA would soon draw the funds.
King forwarded
TBA’s 6 Dec. 1800 letter, above,
with his letter to JQA of [Jan.
1801] (Adams
Papers). JQA enclosed this letter in one to Rufus
King of 7 Feb. (CSmH:Rufus
King Papers).
th:Feb
y1801
I have your letters of 30th:
ulto & 3d
currt: for which I thank you—1 The letter, which has so copiously
extracted your indignation, not without good cause, did not provoke me,
however, in the same degree. I do not see for my part, what other notions of
Government, Mr: Jefferson could be expected to
entertain— It was because he was known to think in the style of this letter,
that the people have rewarded him, as far as they could, with the Chief
Magistracy— I know not how far Mr: J——n is
sincere in these opinions, but he has been so long in the habit of avowing
them, that I suspect he believes himself so— Now, I dont think at all worse,
of the writer of this letter, than I did before I saw it. I believe, that it
necessarily arises out of our Constitution of Government, that men must lose
their honesty, or despair of promotion, to the exclusion of the present
incumbent. An elective democratic republic, is of all forms of Government,
that which admits the greatest latitude of corruption, and in my opinion,
necessarily leads to it. We shall swim in blood before this evil will be
corrected—
I believe rather more than you do, in Mr: Jeffersons observation, as to “the great
question, which divides our Citizens,” because I can trace the same
consequences from this source of division, as you attribute to a different
one— When our Citizens shall try the
experiment, as I think they will ere long, of giving a preponderance of
power to the Republican branch of our government—then I shall look for all
the horrors of Anarchy and uproar— This is my notion of, “the tempestuous
sea of liberty—”
It is reported, on what authority, I know not, that Judge
Addison, Mr: Kittera & Joseph Hopkinson are
applicants for the Office of 563
federal judge, should the judiciary Bill pass—2 Either of these men, in my
opinion, would be improper— Hopkinson alone would only not disgrace it. The other two, though strong friends of
James Ross, are men of less character than ought to appertain to a judge—
The President will do right, in all thin[gs,] I am persuaded, where his
information will enable him—
I am, dear William / Your friend
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “William S Shaw / City of Washington”; internal address: “W S Shaw”; endorsed: “Phila 8 Feb / T B. Adams Esq / rec 11 Feb. / An 15. “Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
Shaw’s letter of 30 Jan. has not been found; that of 3 Feb. is above.
For JA’s nomination of John Wilkes Kittera to replace Jared Ingersoll as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, see TBA to JA, 14 Dec. 1800, note 2, above. Alexander Addison of the Penn. Court of Common Pleas did not receive an appointment to the federal judiciary (vol. 13:515). For Joseph Hopkinson’s 1828 appointment, see TBA to JA, 28 Dec. 1800, and note 2, above.
TBA wrote again to Shaw on 9 Feb. 1801, reconciling the costs of exchanging publications and reporting that Philadelphia merchants were planning a dinner in honor of Oliver Wolcott Jr. (MWA:Adams Family Letters).