Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14

Abigail Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 25 January 1801 Adams, Abigail Adams, Thomas Boylston
Abigail Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams
Dear Thomas. Washington Janry 25 1801

I received Yours of the 20th Instant.1 You will see how matters have gone in senate respecting the Convention. Dean Swift in verses upon his own death, Says of those who had predicted his death

“They’d rather that the Dean should dye than there predictions prove a lie”2

So the party had rather the whole convention should be negatived and every thing put again at the mercy of France, than assent to an accommodation with them; Yet pretend that they are fearfull of Mr Jeffersons prediliction in favour of France. they see and know now, what is before them; with the present Government of France they cannot expect to obtain better terms; for pay they cannot, and to have promised it, would not have been so sincere as to have waved it— the jealousy of G Britain would be more excited by a mission to France by the New President, and the Country in general would have less confidence in obtaining terms favourable to it— Yet a blind spirit of Party appear willing to risk all. I think they ought to take the Name, of the Risk alls, for that desperate Game they have play’d untill they have brought the Country into a State of Jeopardy; that there are dareing projects on foot I as fully believe, as the 540 Gentleman who told me so, and with the present views and temper which prevails. I cannot but think the President will find himself fortunate in his release; he might have stoped there career a few years longer—but he would have had the new faction to have contended against; I have inclosed You a curious conversation, which tho at table, was not heard by any one but ourselves, as we spoke low— it is a little too much in the Tench Cox Stile to commit it to writing, but it is only for your amusement; You will draw this inference from it, that there are certain persons, who carry every thing they hear, and I dare say many things they make, to the Ear of mr J——n if only what is said by the Party be told; his prospect is not a summer sea— If Burr should be Elected, which I do not believe, it will not be from any superiour confidence either party can place in him— his private Character will not bear the scrutiny which mr Jeffersons will. I believe he would become a Buonaparty if he could. he is bold, dareing, nothing to lose of property or Reputation ambitions, insinuating, a voluptuary in practise, and as to Religion—I Do not think he feels any restraints from it. I think him a much more dangerous Man than mr Jefferson; mr J—— will be too lax, too wild and levelling, the other will draw as tight as he dare;— after all it is a scylla & Charibdis buisness—

It is laughable to hear the offices which even the federilist are for placing the President in. one wants to make him Ambassador, an other chief Justice—and an other Govenour—comforting things be sure—3 Farmer Adams—if Farmer he could be upon his own System, would be enviable to any thing in the power of the country to give or grant. no more Elective offices for Me— I think too highly of the Rank and Station in which I have been placed ever to give my consent to a scondary and Subordinate station; looking upon myself in this Sense, one and indivissible to degrade ourselves, to descend voluntarily, and by choice, from the highest to a lower Rank, to quit the care of a Nation, for that of a state—those who will Submit to it, must possess more of Humity than falls to my Lot— yet can I in a private and retired life practise all the oeconomy to which I know I must be called, and feel no degradation or mortification but for my Country—

Inclosed is a curious Letter.4 is there any such craizy fellow— return the Letter— next twesday I propose quitting here. do You know where I can get more private lodgings than at Francis’is mrs Bradford and Boudinot request Me to put up with them— I do not propose staying more than a day or two, but I think I had better 541 have lodgings—5 I shall feel more at My Ease— adieu your ever / affectionate Mother

AA—
ENCLOSURE

a Conversation at table between Mrs A and Mr J——n last thursday.

Mr J—6 pray who is that Gentleman who sits next but one to the President?

that is Mr Waln of Pennsilvana.7

I never saw him to know him before. Pray who is the next?

that is Mr Homes You surely know him, Smiling he is a democrat.8

No I do not.

Mrs A— I know nearly all the Gentlemen of Both houses, a few voilent Demos, excepted who have excluded themselves from our table;

Mr J——n I do not know one in twenty. they complain, and say that I will not take my Hat off to them when I pass them, but I cannot help it, I have no Means of knowing them; I never see them but at your table.

Mrs A— do you never go into the House of Reps’

No I cannot. I am sure there are persons there who would take a pleasure in saying something, purposely to affront me.

Mrs A aya I cannot answer for them. I wished my Self to have gone last winter when one or two interesting questions were before the House, but was restrained by the same consideration; Party Spirit is much alike upon both sides the Question.

Mr J indeed I think there is more candor and liberality upon one side than there is upon the other.

I differ from You Sir, Yet I do not deny but that there is a difference amongst those who profess the Same sentiments. Some are mere Brutes, others are Gentlemen— but party Spirit, is a blind spirit; I was at the House to day for the first time; I would have gone into the Senate, but was obliged to return home.9

Mr J— I wish you had been there; Mr Gov Morris really made an eloquent speech upon the subject of the Mausoleum, and mr Cocke tried for his life to make one too. it was really diverting10

pray sir what do the Senate design to do with the convention?

upon my Soul, I believe they will reject it—

I am surprized at that. the Mercantile interest, in the great states of 11 are in favour of it—

Mr J I have information from the South that they are so.

542

Mrs A. there have always been a party determined to defeat it from the first sending the Mission. I Mean the Hamiltonians; they must abide the concequences—

Mr J— pray is not your New Senator Mason of that party;

Mrs A I think he is.—12

mr J— Foster I think is not.

there sir You are mistaken.13 Foster was brought into senate by that party, to the exclusion of Mr Sewall who ought to have been Senator. mr Foster is not one of the voilent Party Men— His Brother however votes and thinks differently from him—

Mr J— I think Chipman as bitter a Man as any in Senate—

Mrs A— I know very little of Mr Chipman I never see him but at publick dinners—and he is a very silent Man— Mr Paine I am well acquainted with. he is a sensible well informd candid Man, and as free from party Spirit as any Gentleman I know14

Mr J— I wonder what they mean to do? they have Some daring projects on foot;

as I Supposed this refered to the Election, I replied I do not know, that is a subject which I do not chuse to converse upon— I have heard of a Clergyman who upon some difficulty amongst his people, took a text from these words—“and they knew not what to do”—from whence he drew this inference, [“]that when a people were in such a Situation, that they do not know what to do; they should take great care that they do not do—they know not what.” at this he laught out, and here ended the conversation—

RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mrs: A Adams / 25th: Jany 1801 / 30th: Recd: / 1st: Feby ansd:”; enclosure endorsed: “Conversation—”; notation on enclosure by CFA: “This conversation must have taken place in the last days of January 1801. / C F A.”; enclosure filmed at [Jan. 1801?]. Dft of enclosure (Adams Papers); filmed at [Jan. 1801?].

1.

TBA to AA, 20 Jan., for which see AA to TBA, 15 Jan., note 2, above.

2.

Jonathan Swift, “Verses on the Death of the Rev. Doctor Swift,” lines 132–133.

3.

William Tudor wrote to JA on 9 Jan., suggesting that on retirement the former president could be appointed minister to Britain or France, while Elias Boudinot suggested in a letter of 20 Jan. (both Adams Papers) that J A could become chief justice. JA rebuffed both suggestions, telling Tudor, “I must be Farmer John of Stoney field, and nothing more, (I hope nothing less) for the rest of my Life” (JA to Tudor, 20 Jan., MHi:Adams-Tudor Coll.; to Boudinot, 26 Jan., LbC, APM Reel 120).

4.

A second enclosure has not been found.

5.

In his 1 Feb. reply TBA recommended alternative public lodgings to Francis’ Hotel but advised AA to stay in private lodgings. He also thanked her for the enclosure, writing that it “amused me much,” and commented on expectations that JA would hold another public office, stating that “there are silly people enough, in this world to invent & propagate the idlest schemes” (Adams Papers).

6.

In the Dft, AA added here, “a Gentleman who always conducts her to table when he dines here.”

543 7.

Robert Waln (1765–1836) was a Pennsylvania merchant and Federalist who had served in the House since 3 Dec. 1798 ( Biog. Dir. Cong. ).

8.

For David Holmes, a Virginia congressman since 1797, see LCA, D&A , 2:641.

9.

AA attended the House session on 22 Jan. 1801 and heard a committee report on proposed constitutional amendments regarding the method of choosing presidential electors and congressional representatives. The House then spent the rest of the day debating the continuation of the Sedition Act ( Annals of Congress , 6th Cong., 2d sess., p. 941–958).

10.

On 22 Jan. the Senate continued debating the erection of a mausoleum to George Washington. The speeches of neither Gouverneur Morris of New York nor William Cocke of Tennessee were recorded in the day’s proceedings, although Morris wrote in his diary that he spoke “a little” on the topic but that his efforts had “little Effect” (Morris, Diaries , 2:157).

11.

In the Dft, AA added, “Massachusetts N York & pensilvana.”

12.

In the Dft, AA added, “a man of Sense sir and would not I believe go all lengths with them, but I believe he favours that party—”

13.

In the Dft, AA added, “he is the very breath of their mouth.”

14.

That is, Senator Dwight Foster of Massachusetts and his brother, Senator Theodore Foster of Rhode Island, and the senators from Vermont, Nathaniel Chipman (1752–1843) and Elijah Paine (vol. 13:214, 376–377; AA to TBA, 12 June 1800, and note 5, above; Biog. Dir. Cong. ).

William Smith Shaw to Thomas Boylston Adams, 25 January 1801 Shaw, William Smith Adams, Thomas Boylston
William Smith Shaw to Thomas Boylston Adams
City of Washington Jan 25th 1801

Yourss of the 20th & 21st are received.1 I also received this morning a compleat sett of the Port folio without any letter or direction respecting them. Presuming they were sent to be at my disposal, I shall send them by tomorrow’s mail, to Anapolis where I expect to get many subscribers. I some time since sent a sett to Boston and another to young Chace at Baltimore, and if I had a number more, I think I could dispose of them to advantage.2 A few more of the “Prospectus” at least would be agreeable. But notwithstanding all the exertions of his friends, if Mr. Dennie continues to admit the observations of such political heretics as “a native American,” he never can and ought not to receive encouragement. For a periodical publication “submitted to men of afluence, men of liberality and men of letters” as is the Port folio and which justly assumes so high a rank, in its third number, to be so lavish, in terms of unqualified approbation, of a hireling miscreant, who has calumniated our government and our Country and insulted the understanding of every individual in it is in my opinion, not only very impolitic but materially wrong. I allude to what the author says of Cobbet.3 Many of the gentlemen of Congress have told me they were very sorry to see such a production admitted and Mr. Rutledge among the rest. The whole piece is very exceptionable and I was very sorry to see it. You ought to expostulate with Dennie, on the impropriety of admitting such publications

544

I am surprised to hear that you never knew till lately of the “Romans in Greece.” It laid on the Presidents & mine my table all last winter at Philadelphia. The manuscript was sent to the P——t by our consul in Italy Mr Willys. I was so pleased with the perusal that I obtained leave to have it published and it was accordingly given to Nancrede, but I doubt whether he ever sold many of them.4

I told you in my last, that a committee was authorized to bring in a bill, renewing the sedition law. Two or three of the democrats have since taken seats in the house and there is great reason to fear they will not be able to carry it.5 If they do not, it will be very lamentable. I wish the law with some alterations should be permanent. I would make it ten times as severe as it now is. In addition to fine and imprisonment I would add certainly the pillory & perhaps the rack. To establish a government founded on public opinion and to allow that public opinion to be misled and corrupted by the lowest miscreants of society, who have talents only to invent a falshood is not my system. No, no. Government should be respected—character should not be violated with impunity. A bill has been reported to the house for the government of this district similar to the system proposed by “Epaminondas” which I think a tolerable good one and hope will pass. A strong energetic government would add to the respectability—hasten the growth and progress of this city and if any thing under heaven will, establish a degree of harmony among the citizens. The Committe of Commerce & manufactures are authorized to bring in a bill for the further suspension of the intercourse between the US & France.6

I inclose to you with this the Prussian treaty, three copies and will send you more if you wish for them.—7 I also send a letter of R. B. giving an account of himself, which I hope & believe Mr Dennie will consider worthy of an insertion in his port folio otherwise I must request you to return it as I highly value it…8 I have been collecting a compleat sett of Statepapers for myself I want nothing to compleat it, but the pamphlets published under the sixth article of the Brit. treaty, for which I wish you to apply to Mr Reid & or Mr Evans who I presume will have no objection to furnishing you with a sett.—9 The P——t ought to be supplied with a compleat sett also. Please to attend to this immediately. With this you have also the judiciary bill, which has undergone considerable alterations and is now more like the one first reported to the house last session

In haste yours

W S Shaw
545

RC (ViU:Adams Family Letters); internal address: “T. B Adams Esqr”; endorsed: “W. S. Shaw / 25th: Jany 1801. / 30th: Recd: / Do acknd: & answd:.”

1.

TBA’s letters to Shaw of 20 Jan. (MHi:Misc. Bound Coll.) and 21 Jan. (MWA:Adams Family Letters) commented on the popularity of the Port Folio in Washington, D.C., and conveyed Joseph Dennie Jr.’s thanks for Shaw’s role in soliciting subscribers.

2.

Probably Samuel Chase Jr. (1773–1841), a Baltimore lawyer (The New Baltimore Directory, Baltimore, 1800, p. 26, Evans, No. 38040; A Biographical Dictionary of the Maryland Legislature, 1635–1789, ed. Edward C. Papenfuse and others, 2 vols., Baltimore, 1979–1985, entry on Samuel Chase Sr.).

3.

The Port Folio, 1:18–19 (17 Jan. 1801), printed an article by “A Native American,” who argued that the Convention of 1800 should not be ratified and the United States should commit to an alliance with Britain. The author also described William Cobbett as a writer of “bold and energetic talents” who was forced into exile by “persecution, and ingratitude.”

4.

The Romans in Greece. An Ancient Tale, Descriptive of Modern Events, by Vittorio Barzoni, compared the French to ancient Roman conquerors. Boston bookseller Paul Joseph Guerard de Nancrede published the work in 1799, Evans, No. 35160 (vol. 11:501; JA, Papers , 19:363; Madeleine B. Stern, “Joseph Nancrede, Franco-American Bookseller–Publisher, 1761–1841,” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 70:44 [1976]). For U.S. consul at Barcelona William Willis, see TBA to AA, 3 Oct. 1800, and note 1, above.

5.

On 31 Dec. a committee in the House of Representatives recommended that the Sedition Act, which was due to expire on 3 March 1801, be extended for two years. During debate on 21 Jan. the committee chair, Federalist Jonas Platt of New York, called arguments questioning the constitutionality of the act “absurd.” Democratic-Republican William Charles Cole Claiborne of Tennessee countered that the act was “a violent outrage upon the great charter of American rights—the Constitution.” On 19 Feb. Platt introduced a bill to extend the act, but it was defeated by four votes two days later, and the Sedition Act consequently expired ( Annals of Congress , 6th Cong., 2d sess., p. 874, 876–877, 916–940, 946–958, 960–976, 1038–1039, 1047–1050).

6.

On 10 Feb. Samuel Smith, as chair of the House Committee on Commerce and Manufactures, introduced a bill to extend the June 1798 prohibition against American ships entering French ports and vice versa. The bill was defeated in a 59 to 37 vote, and the prohibition expired on 3 March 1801 (vol. 13:96, 398; Annals of Congress , 6th Cong., 2d sess., p. 1011–1020). For Augustus Brevoort Woodward’s Epaminondas essays, see Shaw to TBA, 8 Jan., and note 16, above.

7.

Enclosure not found. The Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce of 1799 was printed in English and French after its 4 Nov. 1800 proclamation as Traite d’amitié et de commerce, entre Sa Majeste le Roi de Prusse, et les Etats Unis de I’Amerique, [Washington, D.C., 1800], Evans, No. 38910.

8.

Ellipsis in MS.

9.

Probably John Read, Observations on the Part of the United States … to the Reply of Daniel Dulany. Under the Sixth Article of the Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation, [Phila., 1798], Evans, No. 49910, and a work by Thomas Macdonald, Thomas Fitzsimons, and William Cobbett, A Brief Statement of Opinions, Given in the Board of Commissioners, under the Sixth Article of the Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation, Phila., 1800, Evans, No. 37428. Read (1769–1854), Princeton 1787, was U.S. general agent and Griffith Evans (1760–1845) was secretary to the board of commissioners overseeing British claims under Art. 6 of the Jay Treaty ( Princetonians , 4:222–224; Townsend Ward, “Griffith Evans,” PMHB , 6:342, 343 [1882]).