Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14

Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch, 1 December 1800 Adams, Abigail Cranch, Mary Smith
Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch
my Dear Sister Washington December 1st 1800

I have written to You my Dear Sister twice since my arrival here. I know not but one of the Letters was in the lost mail1 I miss your pen which used to detail to me both public and private affairs I have reason to bless God, that Your Life is spared to your family, and Friends.— I hope You will not be induced by any Means to over exert yourself, or try Your strength beyond its bearing; a relapse being often more fatal than an original disease.— if you can recover Your strength and appetite, I hope Your Health will be benifitted. Poor Mrs Johnsons eldest unmarried Daughter has been sick ever since I came with the Same kind of fever.—2 She is Much reduced, and her complaints have been very Similar to those who have been sick with us. She has been twice bled. I am not however satisfied that it was the best practise; the fever has run to 21 days— We have hitherto been very well, untill last night Susan was threatned with the Quincy, which allarmd me very much as she went well to bed. I was Waked in the night by a strange noise. She sleeps in a little chamber near to Mine. I went in, and found her labouring with that Dreadfull hoars cough, and sound which indicated immediate medical aid— we sent for the Physician nearest to us, who gave her calomil put her feet in warm water, and Steamed her with Warm vinigar. she puked, and that seemd to relieve her. she has coughed all day—but not with So much hoarsness— I think she has woorms— I Saw mr Cranch on fryday he is well. little Nancy had a return of the Ague. Mr Cranch is going to remove to capitol Hill, which will bring him half a mile nearer to me, and is I believe a much healthier Spot—3

My dear sister I beg you would not trouble yourself about my Bacon this Year, only be so kind as to give the proper directions to Mr & Mrs Porter. I was rejoiced to learn by Your son in a Letter from his Father, that mrs Norten was on the recovery, and able to walk her Room. poor creature, what has she not Suffered?

I have not got a line from My much honord and respected Friend Dr Tufts Since I left home. I hope bad health is not the cause pray tell him, I am only one hundred and 50 Miles, further off than formerly, tho the winter communication is 14 days instead of 7—

as to politicks; they are at present such a mere turn penny, that I believe it is best to leave all calculations to those who daily occupy themselves with them, and say what from the Sincerity of My Heart 458 I do; that I hope the termination of the present contests will be Such as will be most productive of the Peace Liberty and happiness of our common Country, let who will be at the Head of the Government.—

inclosed are some Letter which you will be so kind as to have deliverd—4

with the sincerest regard to all My Friends and my Dear sister in particuliar

I am ever / yours

A Adams

RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters); addressed: “Mrs Mary Cranch / Quincy”; endorsed by Richard Cranch: “Letter from Mrs / A Adams Decr 1st / 1800. Washington.”

1.

Only AA’s letter to Cranch of 21 Nov., above, has been found.

2.

That is, Carolina Virginia Marylanda Johnson.

3.

For William Cranch’s move within Washington, D.C., see AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 21 Dec., and note 6, below.

4.

Not found.

John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 3 December 1800 Adams, John Quincy Adams, Thomas Boylston
John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams
N: 18. 17. Septr: 24. My dear Brother. Berlin 3. December 1800.

I had been almost three months without receiving a line from you, or from any other of my correspondents in America; and although upon coolly considering circumstances I was sensible that this was the natural fruit of my own neglect of writing during the last Winter, yet as one’s feelings never make the allowances which sober reason requires, I began to think it strange to be so long without letters from you, when last evening, on returning from Prince Ferdinand’s, (where the princess had renewed my dolour by particularly enquiring when I had heard from you) I found a cover from Mr: Pitcairn, enclosing your most welcome favour of September 28–30.— This at least proves that my late letters have not all failed on their passage; though between those of 28. May and 24. July, which safely reached you, there were others of June 14 and of July 6. 11. 15. 16. and 22. which ought regularly to have come to your hands.—1 The most important of them relative to my private affairs was that of 15. July, which I sent by duplicates, and which I still hope you received soon after the date of yours to which I am now replying.— I mention all these dates, because from the frequency of failure in the conveyance of letters from Hamburg to the United States, Mr: Pitcairn has 459 strong suspicions of mal practices on the part of some Captains to whom they are entrusted.2

I am entirely satisfied with the account of your proceedings in my pecuniary concerns.— If the disastrous influence of New-York upon every thing in which our family are interested, were the only cause of my distrusting the solidity of Manhattan stock, I believe I should get over the scruples of mere fatality, and keep my shares; but besides my aversion to against trusting my property to any person of whose honesty I am not firmly convinced, the circumstance you mention, that by selling out you could not place the money elsewhere so profitably rather tends to strengthen suspicion than confidence— It proves, that the interest upon that stock, bears more than its proportional value to its capital.—3 It is an universal rule among prudent merchants to distrust the solidity of a house that pays extraordinary interest for money, and I am in this instance disposed to apply the principle— I approve therefore of your intention of selling out to the best advantage you can, even though by another use of the proceeds, the interest yielded will not be quite so good.

You speak of it as a problematical point whether the federalists will divide at the new election; by all the other accounts from America it appears unquestionable that they will, and I consider already the result as perfectly ascertained— You are all so extremely discreet about the original cause of the difference which has ended in a scission of the friends to Government and good order, that I know not even to this day what it is imputable to— But if the last mission to France was the point, every real friend of the President, and of our Country will rejoyce that he adopted and persisted in that measure though it should be at the expence of his election.— There has been no one period since the commencement of our present national government, when the aspect of our affairs with relation to foreign states, has been so favourable as at the present moment. We have indeed suffered injustice from both the great warring powers, and in settling our controversies with them, have made our sacrifices for the benefit of preserving peace— But compare our losses and sufferings, I will not say with those of any nation which has been engaged in the war, but with those of any other neutral nation, and we shall have reason to esteem ourselves peculiarly fortunate— Whoever considers how essentially weak our government is, and with what a violent and powerful internal opposition it has had to contend, in carrying through every measure, with the immense importance to the future interests and welfare, of the United States, of 460 establishing as a precedent the system of neutrality, in all the wars of Europe in which they have no concern, will do ample justice to the wisdom and firmness of that policy which the first President of the Union adopted, and which his successor has so happily accomplished, that whatever the future events in Europe may be, we at least have a fair and rational hope of escaping the calamities of war.— With respect to our internal concerns, they still appear to have their dark and gloomy sides.— The spirit of faction reigns with unabated virulence, and even the sense of the indispensable necessity of the national union, for the welfare of all, seems rather to be weakening than gaining strength in the minds of the people.— Those absurd principles of unlimited democracy, which the people of our Southern States, by the most extraordinary of all infatuations have so much countenanced and encouraged, are producing their natural fruits, and if the planters have not discovered the inconsistency of holding in one hand the rights of man, and in the other a scourge for the back of slaves, their negroes have proved themselves better logicians than the masters.— I hope however that the dreadful catastrophe which befell the french islands of the West-Indies will yet be avoided in every part of our country, and above all that any insurrection of the blacks will, far from meeting any encouragement in the eastern States, have every exertion of their energy employ’d for its suppression.

In my last letter I partly promis’d you a better account than I could then give of Leipzig; and I ought perhaps earlier than this have closed the series of my letters to you upon our summer’s tour, by informing you of our return to this town—4 But even at the date of my last I was afflicted with a severe pain in the breast, which I took at Breslau, which was followed by a bad cough, and a slight spitting of blood, and which was not entirely removed untill after we reached Berlin. During the five weeks we spent at Leipzig, I was confined almost the whole time to my chamber— My wife was yet more unwell than myself; so that we saw of that city absolutely nothing but its streets, its houses, and its fair, which resembles all the fairs of which you have seen so many in Holland; only that here it is upon a larger scale.— We left Leipzig on the 23d: of October, and arrived safely here the 25th:— Since our return both my wife’s health and my own have been much improved— At present I have only one complaint, from which I believe it is vain to expect relief, and which is very tedious though not dangerous. Louisa upon the whole is I think better than she has been at any time since our marriage.

461

Our domestic life, since we came back has return’d to its usual course. We live still in the same house, as when you left us, but have made our arrangements for leaving it on the 1st: of April next.—5 As there is just at this time more cause why an American in public character should be kept at some one of the northern Courts, than there has been before since the Treaty here was finish’d, there is a possibility that it may not be deemed expedient to recall me as yet; but I shall keep myself as much as will be practicable, in a constant state of preparation to depart.

I feel a sort of reluctance in entering upon political topics, because the subject is hardly susceptible of compression within the limits of a single sheet, and I have lately been obliged in other letters to enter into it— The armistice between France and Austria which follow’d the great battle of Marengo has been renewed once or twice at the expence of immense sacrifices on the part of the Austrians; but as they have hitherto persisted in the pretension that England must be admitted to the negotiation for a general peace, and as France has irrevocably resolved to treat only with each of the two powers separately, the armistice is already at an end, and the hostilities have recommenced. By our latest accounts from Paris and from Vienna, it appears that the Emperor of Germany, and the first Consul Buonaparte, have both determined to place themselves at the head of their respective armies— But it is universally considered that France has the game altogether in her own hands— Nobody expects that it will cost the french more than one battle, to get to Vienna, and nobody doubts but that if the battle be fought it will be won by them. It is however by no means improbable that this will be avoided by the Austrian Cabinet, as they did in the year 1797, and that a momentary peace will be patch’d up again, at the expence of some poor defenceless German and Italian princes, and Republics. Even at the moment when the hostilities were renewed, Count Cobentzel and Joseph Bonaparte both went to Luneville, and are ready to sign preliminaries in four and twenty hours when the case of urgency shall call for it.6

England will therefore very soon be left once more to carry on the war alone; as to her allies the Portuguese and the Turks they are rather to be considered as burdensome than advantageous to her.— But she will no longer have the sure neutrality, or the prospect of alliance with the northern powers in her favour. They have all been turned partly by her mismanagement, and partly by their own ill-judg’d passions against her in heart and soul. The armed neutrality 462 is recalled from its ashes to withstand her naval supremacy— The Emperor of Russia is upon the point of formal war with her—Has embargoed all the English vessels in his ports, and sent into Siberia all the English sailors who were at St: Petersburg— Prussia holds indeed a more soothing language but has shewn the same disposition of resistance against English maritime law. This temper is the more perplexing to England at this moment, because it has stop’d the sources from which she expected a supply of grain, in the present distressing scarcity which she suffers.7 The exportation from Livonia, and even from Dantzig is expressly prohibited— If at these measures she ventures to show any resentment, her communication with all the north of Europe will be instantly cut off, and to effect it the more easily, the king of Prussia has taken possession of Cuxhaven and Ritzebuttel. Upon the whole I consider the situation of England, as having never been more critical than at present, and under these circumstances it is peculiarly fortunate for us to have made our arrangement with France— The English Government, and all their dependent newspaper writers declaimed against our negotiation at Paris, because they themselves under the influence of a little brief success, thought they should have it in their power to dictate for the whole world.— But the tables have been so completely turned upon them that they most heartily wish now, they had followed our example, and negotiated themselves when the offer was made to them last Winter— They are at least now so sensible that they have enemies enough to contend with, that they not only think it expedient to take in good part our new Convention with France, but have given a formal and positive assurance to that effect.

The french have as usual in the course of the armistice taken care to enjoy almost every advantage, they could have had in a state of hostility— The three fortresses of Ulm, Ingolstadt and Philipsburg were put into their hands as a depôt, for continuing the armistice forty-five days.— Before the hostilities were renewed, they demolished all those fortifications, and have in consequence no strong place to arrest them in their progress to Vienna— In Italy they improved their time equally well, and overran all Tuscany, during the very period of the armistice—8 The Austrians complain that these proceedings were in both instances violations of good faith— That the fortresses were delivered as a trust, and that Tuscany was expressly included within the armistice— But what avail complaints against the power of the strongest? What argument has ever been found to resist the logic of victory?

463

Among the most curious vicissitudes of human affairs and opinions, may be reckoned the indisputable fact that in no part of Europe the cause of Jacobinism is in a state of so much humiliation and disgrace as in France.— Bonaparte like Caesar, used their principles as the steps of his ladder for ascending to supreme power, and the moment he was mounted kicked the ladder away— They begin already to circulate in France pamphlets to prove the necessity of vesting the sovereignty in him and his family, as a hereditary right— This I think he will hardly accomplish, for although Fortune has hitherto treated him as one of her most darling favourites, she will hardly in a long course of time abandon for his sake the character of fickleness which essentially belongs to her nature— Every moment of his existence depends upon a perpetual miracle of her kindness to him, and the time must sooner or later come when that miracle will cease; the time when as one of his countrymen long ago said

“Le masque tombe, l’homme reste Et le héros s’evanouit.”9

Adieu, my dear brother. I hope to hear from you soon again, and that the communication between the two continents will not be so much obstructed by the rigour of the season this winter, as it has been the two years past— There is hitherto no immediate prospect of an interruption in the navigation of the Elbe, and I shall not suffer again so long an intermission of my correspondence, as I had to answer for the last Spring— I am ever your’s

A.

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Thomas B. Adams Esqr.”; endorsed: “JQ Adams Esqr: / 3d: Decr: 1800 / 19th. June Recd: 1801.” and “No 18.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 134.

1.

TBA’s letter to JQA of 28 Sept. has not been found. Of the letters JQA wrote to TBA between 28 May and 24 July, only that of 6 July has not been found. The letter of 28 May is above. In his letter of 14 June, JQA reported on social activities in Berlin and urged TBA to write to LCA (FC-Pr). JQA’s letter of 10 July, for which the LbC is dated the 11th, is above, and for that of 15 July, see his letter to TBA of 16 July, and note 1, above. The letters of 22 and 24 July were begun on the 20th and 23d, respectively, for which see A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, No. I, and note 11, above.

2.

Joseph Pitcairn raised his suspicions about the mishandling of mail sent to the United States in a letter to JQA of 4 Nov. 1800, not found, for in his reply of 11 Nov. (LbC, APM Reel 134) JQA voiced his disapproval: “If the captains are guilty of such practices as you have reason to suspect, there should be some provision by law to guard against them, & punish them.” JQA reported the information and made a similar recommendation in an 8 Dec. dispatch to John Marshall (LbC, APM Reel 132).

3.

For JQA’s shares in the Manhattan Company, see his letter to TBA of 28 May, and note 2, above.

4.

See A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, No. IX, and note 2, above.

5.

Since June 1798 JQA and LCA had resided in an apartment at the corner of Friedrichstrasse and Behrenstrasse, in an area 464 where much of the diplomatic corps in Berlin lived (LCA, D&A , 1:56).

6.

Franco-Austrian hostilities in Germany were suspended on 15 July 1800 and an armistice was signed at Paris on the 28th. The armistice was renewed on 20 Sept. after concessions by Austria and expired on 14 Nov., after which France informed Austria it would not be renewed. Hostilities resumed in December, and Gen. Jean Victor Moreau secured a decisive victory for France on 3 Dec. at the Battle of Hohenlinden. Archduke Charles was appointed to the command of the Austrian forces on 9 Dec. and fighting continued until the 25th, when an armistice was signed at Steyr, Austria. Count Johann Ludwig Josef von Cobenzl subsequently initiated peace negotiations with Joseph Bonaparte and Talleyrand at Luneville, France, where a treaty was signed on 9 Feb. 1801, ending the war between Austria and France and reaffirming many of the provisions of the 1797 Treaty of Campo Formio (vol. 12:272; Roberts, Napoleon , p. 285–286, 290; Karl A. Roider Jr., Baron Thugut and Austria’s Response to the French Revolution, Princeton, N.J., 1987, p. 347–348, 357–359).

7.

Britain signed an alliance with Portugal in 1793, but after the coup d’état of 18 brumaire France and Spain pressured the Portuguese to cut ties with Britain. Portugal refused, culminating in a Spanish invasion in May 1801. Britain also signed a defensive alliance with the Ottoman Empire on 5 Jan. 1799. On 30 Oct. 1799 the Ottomans granted the British most favored nation status, which helped Britain to address a national grain shortage that was compounded by the Russian embargo of 18 Nov. and the renewal of the League of Armed Neutrality of 1780 (Alexander Grab, Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe, Basingstoke, Eng., 2003, p. 145–146; J. C. Hurewitz, Diplomacy in the Near and Middle East: A Documentary Record: 1535–1914, 2 vols., Princeton, N.J., 1956, 1:65–68; W. Freeman Galpin, The Grain Supply of England during the Napoleonic Period, N.Y., 1925, p. 16–18). For more on Anglo-Russian relations, see JQA to TBA, 28 May 1800, and note 6, above.

8.

The Austrian fortresses at Ulm, Ingolstadt, and Philippsburg were relinquished as a condition of the renewal of the Franco-Austrian armistice on 20 September. Disregarding the truce, however, General Moreau ordered their demolition on 13 October. France also occupied Florence during the armistice (JQA to John Marshall, 4 Oct., LbC, APM Reel 132; Yair Mintzker, The Defortification of the German City, 1689–1886, N.Y., 2012, p. 123–124; Roider, Baron Thugut, p. 347–348; Napoleon Bonaparte, Correspondance générale, ed. Thierry Lentz and others, 14 vols. to date, Paris, 2004–, 3:415).

9.

Jean Baptiste Rousseau, “Ode à la Fortune,” lines 119–120, which JQA translated in 1803 as “The mask drops off—the man remains— / The hero disappears” when he translated the entire poem into English (M/JQA/42, APM Reel 237).