Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14

Thomas Boylston Adams to John Adams, 22 October 1799 Adams, Thomas Boylston Adams, John
Thomas Boylston Adams to John Adams
My dear Sir: Germantown 22d: October 1799.

I have received your favors of the 17th: & 19th: instants and take the first moment of leisure, that has occurred, since their receipt, to acknowledge gratefully these fresh instances of parental solicitude respecting my personal concerns. I shall reply without reserve to your last letter, which relates more immediately to my professional prospects.

I have always been persuaded of the necessity of patronage for a young man, at his first entrance into life, be his profession or occupation what it might, but I know it to be preeminently requisite to a young lawyer and that without this patronage, in one shape or an other, he must expect to remain in a subordinate station at the Bar for a length of time, however briliant his talents or his scientific acquisitions. The kind of patronage to which you allude, though useful & important to a young practitioner, is by no means equal to that of a numerous family connection, being of a particular extraction or belonging to some religious sect. With advantages built on either of these foundations a lawyer can scarcely fail of success at the Bar in this state, if he has the capacity to improve them. It is certainly in the power of any gentleman at the head of the profession, who renounces practice himself to advance & befriend a younger brother very essentially, by transferring to him his dockett with his unfinished business & referring future applicants to his Office, & such instances have fallen within my observation; but that friendship & confidence must be very strong, that would induce a gentleman to select a stranger on whom to bestow this favor to the seclusion of a near relative or more intimate acquaintance. I am so fully persuaded of the gloom that overspreads my prospects as a professional man, that I am often tempted to consider what other course of life would furnish me an honest livelihood, should the want of success, in my present line, compel me to renounce it. I cannot say, that I ever 29 made a choice among the variety, that presented themselves to my mind, but if a change of pursuits should hereafter be necessary, I shall at least have the advantage of having contemplated the subject.

The young men of my age & standing at the Bar, have the benefit of five or six years practice or the expectation of it; they have had their time of unprofitable waiting & are beginning to emerge from the state of obscurity in which, with all their advantages of nativity, residence, connection or merits of a personal nature, the profession they followed, compelled them to remain. Some of them are men of business & good lawyers, who will succeed by survivorship, rather than any other title, to “the business, emoluments & honors of the Bar.” There is not however, in my judgment, a single man of first rate talents among the younger stock, Not one Lewis or Ingersoll, though many Rawle’s & Tilghman’s. In the second class there are two or three of considerable merit who will run away with all the business of any lawyer who declines the practice to the exclusion of the younger brethren. That this is the fact no one can doubt, but it does not seem to me to be so much an effect of illiberality & intolerance at the Bar, as of custom & public opinion. All the gentlemen now at the head of the profession have some near relations or friends, who are desirous of being brought forward and who of course succeed to all the inferior business of their patrons. Mr: Lewis excepted, they have all either sons or nephews at the Bar. I am only slightly and distantly acquainted with the gentlemen I have named, and though I should not be fearful of their disobliging, I have no reason to expect they will particularly befriend me. Mr: Ingersoll, whose friendship & patronage I should prize before any of the rest, is in fact the only one to whom I look for encouragement & favor. He has already offered to associate me with him in any cause or law argument, which afforded scope for professional talents & learning, and I expect to argue one case at the next term of the Supreme Court, which was proposed to me by him. It is probable, that other opportunities for exercise will occur to me ere long, but the next & most serious question is, how shall I acquit myself in these trials? Not to be anxious & diffident on this score, would deserve the name of arrogance. My want of experience, & long discontinuance from the language & practice of the bar, in addition to a pretty strong natural want of confidence in myself, all combine to persuade me, that the experiment of a first attempt remains yet to be successfully made, and that odds are against it. A fair trial of success or failure in our profession is not made, generally speaking, in a shorter 30 period than four years even where a person has the advantage of being previously known. In Philadelphia, I am very little known, to those classes of people, who bring lawyers forward. I have never been in a situation to form acquaintance with the tradesmen & mechanic’s & in the Country I have no acquaintance whatever, so that time alone, upon ordinary calculation, can bring me into notice as a professional man. I have always come to this ultimatum, whenever the subject has occupied my thoughts, and calculated the sacrifices to ease, comfort & self esteem, which are necessarily involved in its train. To be driven from the theatre of one’s business by annual returns of pestilence, must be ruinous to such as have a name to establish, while the risk of being swept away by accidental exposure keeps the mind in a continual alarm for personal safety.

All these considerations & many others that might be drawn from a full view of the subject, operate as powerful discouragements & drawbacks upon a settlement at Philadelphia, in addition to which, the political triumph of your enemies in this State, reverberates on me to my detriment, though I regard this as one of the smallest of my grievances. I abhor the party & certainly never would accept a favor, if they should unexpectedly offer to bestow one upon me. It is not usual for those whom we make the objects of detestation, to select us for objects of munificence.

During the chief Justiceship of Mr: Mc:Kean there have been instances of intolerance which proceeded partly from his indiscretion & intemperance of character, but more frequently from the forwardness & impudence of the practitioners, who thought that the cause of their clients would be promoted by a display of zeal & fervor, which often trespassed on the bounds of decorum & frequently deserved a harsher name. I think this sort of conduct is now exploded, & so far as my observation extends, the Bar of Philadelphia is upon an equal footing with any on the Continent in this particular. Mr: Shippen will probably succeed Mr: Mc:Kean as chief Justice, & though he will find it difficult to manage some of the older gentlemen, he will not be hard upon the younger who treat him with respect.1

I have hitherto dwelt upon the dark shades of the picture before me, but dreary as they are, it would give me pain to renounce the hope of a settlement at Philadelphia, without a prospect, almost bordering on certainty, of a speedy & eligible establishment on a different Theatre. The price of living in the City is oppressive for a beginner in any occupation & precludes the hope of a family establishment short of years of successful business; yet unpleasant as this 31 idea is & however irksome the anticipation of being subject to the caprice & incommoded with the continual routine of boarding house society, I could make up my mind to endure the sacrifice, if the prosperity & success of my views were sure of being crowned by it. The removal of the seat of Government will produce a sensible effect upon the rate of living & of rents in Philadelphia, without any considerable diminution of the wealth, so that with a moderate share of practice I might expect at least to keep free of debt, while performing the usual quarantine of professional pretentions.

It would be needless to enlarge on this topic, as from the above specimen you will form a judgment of my train of thought on the subject of myself; I shall be glad to renew the subject, when I have the satisfaction of meeting you in person, being with true respect & attachment / Your Son

T. B. Adams.

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The President.”

1.

Edward Shippen, who had been an associate justice of the Penn. Supreme Court since 1791, succeeded Thomas McKean as chief justice and served until 1805 (vol. 10:166; ANB ).

Thomas Boylston Adams to Joseph Pitcairn, 23 October 1799 Adams, Thomas Boylston Pitcairn, Joseph
Thomas Boylston Adams to Joseph Pitcairn
My dear Sir. Germantown 23d: October 1799.

Between the 8th: & 16th: instants I have been fortunate enough to receive your several agreeable favors of July 6th: August 10th: 15th: 17th: & 28th: with sundry pamphlets &ca: &ca: for all which please to accept my thanks. The muskets by the Connecticut are likewise recd: in good condition.1

By the speedy passages of the Hamburg traders this season, we have been furnished with very recent European intelligence, and the triumphant progress of the allied powers has afforded matter of joy or regret, as the passions & feelings of individuals among us happened to be favorable or adverse to the cause of universal Monarchy for which they seem to be striving.2 It must always happen, so long as America is an independent Republic or nation, that the balance of power in Europe will always continue to be of the utmost importance to her welfare. The moment that either France is victorious & Great Britain with her allies depressed, we have cause to be alarmed for ourselves. The same thing is true when the reverse of this happens. We are of too much consequence in the scale of nations, to be left in the peaceable enjoyment of our Commerce, & gaining strength in proportion as others are losing it, without a 32 struggle at least to draw us into the vortex of war & waste. We have already resisted a single effort from each side since the commencement of the War, and if rumor has any truth in the tales it tells, we are not far removed from a fresh attempt to make us declare for one side or the other. We are, or in my opinion, soon must be, in a state of hostility with all mankind, and I swear as an American, that I had rather encounter the united rage of every power in Europe, as the Barbary States have formerly done, than be leagued, associated or allied with any of them in a common system of defence. Either we can, or we cannot, maintain our Independence, and I am of opinion that affairs in this Country are drawing fast to this issue.

Our Commissioners to France are said to be on the eve of departure in the frigate United States, to sail from Newport.3 This I believe, may be relied upon. We hear that the British Minister has signified to the Government that the departure of these Envoys will be considered by the Coalition as an act of hostility.4 You have this as I hear it every day in public— I cannot vouch for the truth.

I submitted your letters of the 17th: & 28th: August to the perusal of the Secy. of State, who after reading returned them with no other remark than that he could not advise me to enter into the speculation you propose, since the price of those articles you mention, is much lower here than your calculations. On the subject of the Ship to be sold & the article of Copper, he said nothing, but when I see him, I will ask more on these subjects.

By a letter from my brother of the 16th: July, I learn that agreeably to a proposal I made him last May, he consented to take MB 5 2000 of the money I left in your hands & had accordingly drawn for it on that day. I have written you also a request to purchase certain articles for my Mother at Hamburg, charging my account with the cost, which I presume would nearly make a balance between us. Friend Brush, who you say undertook to send my great Coat, has never been polite enough to give me notice of its arrival, though he came safe himself some months ago.6 I had rather run the chance of getting one from you, according to my request, though you should charge it, than wait any longer for the other.

We are about to revisit the Capital after a long & unprofitable absence. The disease has subsided both here & at New York, but not yet disappeared; the danger however of contagion is nearly gone— The Banks have remained through the Season, in spite of the sickness, but the public offices removed to Trenton and are not yet returned. 33 I expect my parents will pass the winter among us, which will contribute much to my comfort. The P——t is already at Trenton.

I will write again ere long, & mean time remain with esteem / Your very obedt: humble Servt:

PS. Our Election for Governor gives us Thomas Mc:Kean by a majority of about six thousand votes— Numbers will always outvote property— Or in other words the democrats will always beat the Aristocrats on a fair trial of strength. If we are to fight G. B. this State will deserve a third part of the burthen of the war.

Our Congress has a better reputation than I fear it will merit when it comes together. The Session will be long & stormy. I look for something great to save the Country.

Philadelphia 26 th:

I find a vessel ready to sail for Bremen and I shall make up my packet for you under cover to our Consul at that place.7

The departure of the Envoys will probably happen about the 1st: of next month. The story of the British Ministers representations on this subject is very doubtful— I am disposed to discredit it, though I have no special authority for so doing.

I am as above / Your’s

RC (OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters); addressed: “Joseph Pitcairn Esqr: / Consul of the United States of America / Hamburg”; internal address: “Jo: Pitcairn Esqr:”; endorsed: “Thomas Adams / 23 Octor 1799 / R. 15 April 1800 / And 30 May”; notation: “To the care of / F. J. Wichelhausen / Bremen” and “Bremen the 14th. April 1800. / Recd: & f[or]warded by / [Yr] Mst Obdt. St:. / pr F[…] [J]acob Wichelhausen.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.

1.

The letters and pamphlets sent by Pitcairn have not been found. For the two muskets purchased for TBA by JQA and shipped by Pitcairn, see vol. 13:498, 539. The ship Connecticut, Capt. Moore, arrived at Philadelphia on 16 Oct. after a passage from Hamburg of 45 days (New-York Gazette, 18 Oct.).

2.

Philadelphia newspapers had recently cited reports from Hamburg detailing advances by Anglo-Russian invasion forces in the Netherlands and the retreat of Napoleon from Syria to Egypt, for which see vol. 13:468 (Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser, 23 Oct.; Philadelphia Universal Gazette, 17 Oct.).

3.

For JA’s decision to initiate a second peace mission to France, see vol. 13:416. Oliver Ellsworth and William R. Davie, two of the three U.S. ministers plenipotentiary, departed Newport, R.I., on the frigate United States, Como. John Barry, on 3 Nov., and arrived at Paris on 2 March 1800, where they were met by the third minister, William Vans Murray. On 2 April negotiations began with three French commissioners, Joseph Bonaparte; Pierre Louis, Comte de Roederer; and Charles Pierre Clarét, Comte de Fleurieu. Negotiations were slowed by contention over the Jay Treaty and the 7 July 1798 congressional act voiding all prior treaties between the United States and France, for which see vol. 13:165. In Sept. 1800 the two sides finally agreed to “a firm, inviolable, and universal peace,” whereby property not yet condemned was returned and most of the provisions of the countries’ earlier treaties were restored. Commercial relations also resumed, but 34 compensation for U.S. losses was deferred. The Convention of 1800 was signed on 3 Oct. at Joseph Bonaparte’s Chateau Môrtefontaine, ending the Quasi-War (DeConde, The Quasi-War , p. 223, 224, 227–228, 254, 256, 257, 443–444; Boston Russell’s Gazette, 7 Nov. 1799; ANB ; Hoefer, Nouv. biog. générale ; Elkins and McKitrick, Age of Federalism , p. 682–687). For the convention’s ratification, see AA to Cotton Tufts, 15 Dec., and note 2, below.

4.

See TBA to William Smith Shaw, 23 Oct. 1799, and note 2, below.

5.

Mark banco, an internal noncirculating currency of account of the Bank of Hamburg that had a higher value than the circulating currency, the mark courant (John J. McCusker, Money and Exchange in Europe and America, 1600–1775: A Handbook, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1978, p. 61–63).

6.

Ebenezer Brush (1763–1814), brother of JA’s deceased acquaintance Eliphalet Brush, was a New York merchant who in April advertised goods for sale lately imported from Hamburg (vol. 7:153, 155–156; Conklin Mann, “Thomas and Richard Brush of Huntington, Long Island,” NYGBR , 67:21 [Jan. 1936]; New-York Directory , 1798, p. 113, Evans, No. 34012; New York Daily Advertiser, 13 April, suppl.).

7.

The Four Friends, Capt. Hathaway, accepted mail for Bremen until 26 Oct. and likely carried TBA’s packet to Frederick Jacob Wichelhausen, who served as U.S. consul at Bremen from 1796 to 1833 (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 22 Oct.; Walter B. Smith II, America’s Diplomats and Consuls of 1776–1865, Washington, D.C., 1986, p. 279).