Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 1 July 1799 Adams, John Quincy Adams, Thomas Boylston
John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams
1. July. 1799.

My last letter to you upon private affairs was of April 29. since which I have received none from you, untill last evening, when your’s of 4. to 12. March, from Quincy, and of 11. May from Baltimore, both came to hand.— In the last, you mention having written me, at full length, the week before by the way of London; but this letter I have not received.1

Your account of the administration of affairs by both my former agents needs no comment as you say, excepting my thanks for the attention with which you went through the very irksome task of collecting the information— With your proceedings I am fully satisfied; and am much more deeply afflicted with the account of my agent at New-York, than with the loss of all my property

Since I wrote you last, I have received a few lines from Doctor Welsh, dated 6. Feby: in which he says he had delivered all my papers to Doctor Tufts; in which however he is mistaken as I find by your letter—2 He adds, that as to the balance in cash, it will not be in his power immediately to discharge it, but shall be obliged to give for it, a note upon interest: he does not even state how that balance stood, and I must therefore make it out by guess— It must amount to 409 dollars, and 61 cents if all the assessments upon the canal shares were paid, to the 30th: inclusively, according to his last account— But if as I fear is the case he there charged for payments which he had not made, the balance will be larger.— The six receipts for the share in the Boston Theatre, for £33:6:8. apiece, I delivered to Doctor Welsh myself, and had paid them all up— In one of his accounts he has charged me, with another payment of £42— so that I cannot be possibly bound to any further expence on that score.

In my letter of April 29. I proposed to you, to sell our obligations in Holland, and invest the proceeds in our funds at home, and empowered you to draw 2000 dollars on the 1st: of September, November and January upon the Secretary of State for that purpose— But I find upon enquiry that we could not sell the obligations under a loss of less than ten per cent, and as the rate of exchange from this place 498 upon Amsterdam is so low, that it would occasion a loss of as much more, I have concluded to keep my obligations untill the period of their repayment which is now only four years distant— Nevertheless, you may draw the 2000 dollars, if you please, from the Secretary of State, on the 1st: of January next, for your own Obligations, and make them over to me.3

My Books and your baggage, sailed from Lisbon on the 26th: of April, for Boston, where I hope they have ere this, arrived

I am very glad that you subscribed for me to the loan; and shall be perfectly satisfied, to have you place my property, as you propose— I shall see if I can get the guns for you, as you desire.4

Your’s—

FC-Pr (Adams Papers); APM Reel 131.

1.

None of these letters from TBA to JQA have been found. In his letter to TBA of 29 April, JQA reported on the state of his property under the stewardship of CA and Thomas Welsh. He admonished TBA to send regular accounts, adding, “You will never think yourself entitled to betray my confidence because I am your brother; or to ruin me, because I cannot take the law of you” (FC-Pr, APM Reel 131).

2.

Not found.

3.

JQA repeated these instructions in a brief letter to TBA of 13 July. He also informed TBA that he and LCA were going to Dresden and Töplitz for the rest of the summer and reported that the second Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce had been signed on 11 July (FC-Pr, APM Reel 131).

4.

JQA purchased two muskets for TBA, for which see his letter to TBA of 16 Aug., and note 5, below.

Benjamin Rush to Abigail Adams, 1 July 1799 Rush, Benjamin Adams, Abigail
Benjamin Rush to Abigail Adams
My dear Madam Philadelphia July 1st: 1799

In addressing a small publication to the President, I am naturally led to congratulate You upon your recovery from your late tedious indisposition.1 May you long continue to enjoy your present health, and to add by your kindnesses, to the happiness of all Connected with you.—

Your Son Thomas calls now & then to see us, but not so Often as we wish. He is fixed in a part of the city which does not promise him immediate success in business. I wish he were situated nearer to market street. Perhaps he has made choice of his present retired Office for the Sake of qualifying himself more fully by previous study for the duties of his profession.— we hear Nothing now of his Attention to the Ladies, so that the President’s fears of his checking his studies, and prospects in life by a premature marriage are Altogether without foundation.— The President I hope has not forgotten 499 the conversation in the presence of both our sons, to Which the above information alludes. I did not think, nor coincide with him. The sooner our sons marry, After they acquire the means of Subsistence, the better. But I will not debate this matter with our friend, at our present distance. After all that can be said on both Sides the Question, our sons will follow their inclinations.—

Our City was alarmed a few days ago with reports of several Cases of the bilious fever, for they cannot be yellow fevers, since the laws we have passed to destroy our trade, in Order to present their importation from the West Indies. At present the public mind is more composed. If the disease should revive, I shall whisper in your son’s ear the necessity of flight, for I have acquired so much of General Lee’s rascally Virtue of prudence upon this subject, that I dare not openly advise even my friends to leave the city.2 A horseshoe upon the sill of a farmer’s door to keep away witches, does not strike my mind as a more degrading proof of the Weakness of the human Understanding, than the present Quarantine laws of the state of Pennsylvania to prevent the importation of the yellow fever, and the cruel treatment they give the men who advise the prevention of it from domestic sources.3

My dear Mrs Rush joins me in most affectionate regards to you & the President. Most of our family are in the Country. Our Eldest son has received his Leiutenant’s Commission in the Navy with great gratitude, and I hope will not dishonour it. He was well on the 25th of may cruising off St Christophers.—4 We do not expect to see him before October.—

From my Dr madam / Your sincere friend

Benjn: Rush.

RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Dr Rush to Mrs Adams / July 1st 1799.”

1.

No letter to JA from Rush has been found, but Rush almost certainly sent him his latest work, Three Lectures upon Animal Life, Delivered in the University of Pennsylvania, Phila., 1799, Evans, No. 36255.

2.

Rush was referring to Gen. Charles Lee’s retreat at the Battle of Monmouth on 28 June 1778, for which see JA, Papers , 7:164.

3.

Pennsylvania’s quarantine policy was set out in the 22 April 1794 “Act for establishing an Health-office” and in supplemental acts passed in 1795, 1796, 1798, and 1799. The legislation established a health office on State Island and two hospitals, prohibited “all intercourse with infected places within the United States,” and quarantined both U.S. and foreign vessels for ten to thirty days. Ships’ captains were required to answer questions about their vessels, cargoes, and crews. On 25 Feb. Congress passed “An Act respecting Quarantines and Health Laws,” upholding state laws and mandating the use of brick warehouses for quarantined materials (A Compilation of the Health-Laws of the State of Pennsylvania, Phila., 1798, Evans, No. 34324; Health-Office, Phila., 1795, Evans, No. 29304; Simon Finger, The Contagious City: The Politics of Public Health in Early Philadelphia, Ithaca, N.Y., 2012, p. 128, 131–132, 136–138, 147; U.S. Statutes at Large , 1:619–620; Oliver Wolcott Jr. to JA, 29 June, Adams Papers; JA to Wolcott, 5 July, CtHi:Wolcott Papers).

500 4.

John Rush (1777–1837) enlisted in the U.S. Navy in May 1798 and was serving as a surgeon aboard the sloop of war Ganges, which had departed St. Christopher’s (now St. Kitts) on 20 May 1799 in pursuit of French privateers (Eric T. Carlson and Jeffrey L. Wollock, “Benjamin Rush and His Insane Son,” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 51:1318, 1321, 1328 [Dec. 1975]; New York Spectator, 19 June).