Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14

John Quincy Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams

Abigail Adams to John Adams

Thomas Boylston Adams to William Smith Shaw, 8 February 1801 Adams, Thomas Boylston Shaw, William Smith
Thomas Boylston Adams to William Smith Shaw
Dear William Philadelphia 8th: Feby 1801

I have your letters of 30th: ulto & 3d currt: for which I thank you—1 The letter, which has so copiously extracted your indignation, not without good cause, did not provoke me, however, in the same degree. I do not see for my part, what other notions of Government, Mr: Jefferson could be expected to entertain— It was because he was known to think in the style of this letter, that the people have rewarded him, as far as they could, with the Chief Magistracy— I know not how far Mr: J——n is sincere in these opinions, but he has been so long in the habit of avowing them, that I suspect he believes himself so— Now, I dont think at all worse, of the writer of this letter, than I did before I saw it. I believe, that it necessarily arises out of our Constitution of Government, that men must lose their honesty, or despair of promotion, to the exclusion of the present incumbent. An elective democratic republic, is of all forms of Government, that which admits the greatest latitude of corruption, and in my opinion, necessarily leads to it. We shall swim in blood before this evil will be corrected—

I believe rather more than you do, in Mr: Jeffersons observation, as to “the great question, which divides our Citizens,” because I can trace the same consequences from this source of division, as you attribute to a different one— When our Citizens shall try the experiment, as I think they will ere long, of giving a preponderance of power to the Republican branch of our government—then I shall look for all the horrors of Anarchy and uproar— This is my notion of, “the tempestuous sea of liberty—”

It is reported, on what authority, I know not, that Judge Addison, Mr: Kittera & Joseph Hopkinson are applicants for the Office of 563 federal judge, should the judiciary Bill pass—2 Either of these men, in my opinion, would be improper— Hopkinson alone would only not disgrace it. The other two, though strong friends of James Ross, are men of less character than ought to appertain to a judge— The President will do right, in all thin[gs,] I am persuaded, where his information will enable him—

I am, dear William / Your friend

T B Adams3

RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “William S Shaw / City of Washington”; internal address: “W S Shaw”; endorsed: “Phila 8 Feb / T B. Adams Esq / rec 11 Feb. / An 15. “Some loss of text where the seal was removed.

1.

Shaw’s letter of 30 Jan. has not been found; that of 3 Feb. is above.

2.

For JA’s nomination of John Wilkes Kittera to replace Jared Ingersoll as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, see TBA to JA, 14 Dec. 1800, note 2, above. Alexander Addison of the Penn. Court of Common Pleas did not receive an appointment to the federal judiciary (vol. 13:515). For Joseph Hopkinson’s 1828 appointment, see TBA to JA, 28 Dec. 1800, and note 2, above.

3.

TBA wrote again to Shaw on 9 Feb. 1801, reconciling the costs of exchanging publications and reporting that Philadelphia merchants were planning a dinner in honor of Oliver Wolcott Jr. (MWA:Adams Family Letters).