Event

The War for Liberty & Union: Contesting Daniel Webster’s Memory in the Civil War North

Tuesday, October 29, 2024 5:00 PM - 6:15 PM EST
Online / NOTE: times are shown in EST

Author: Michael J. Larmann, University of Montana
Comment: Matthew Mason, Brigham Young University
 

This is an online event.

This paper explores Daniel Webster’s (1782-1852) contested memory during the U.S. Civil War. By analyzing newspaper articles, speeches, and political campaigns, it explores how disparate factions manipulated the statesman’s memory to espouse competing definitions of liberty and Union. Partisans, abolitionists, and soldiers all utilized Webster’s past to comprehend the U.S. Constitution and describe the Union they were fighting for. Examining Webster’s memory as a distinct theatre of politics provides us with an analytical window into a divided North and the precarious state of America’s institutions during the Civil War.

Purchasing the $25 seminar subscription gives you advance access to the seminar papers of all seven seminar series for the current academic year. Subscribe at www.masshist.org/research/seminars. Subscribers for the current year may login to view currently available essays.

 

Register to attend online

Online Event

The virtual seminar begins at 5:00 PM and will be hosted on the video conference platform, Zoom. Registrants will receive a confirmation message with attendance information.

By registering you are agreeing to abide by the MHS Visitor Code of Conduct.

Upcoming Events

Social Reform and Identity Formation in the 17th Century - A Panel Discussion
Social Reform and Identity Formation in the 17th Century - A Panel Discussion
Hybrid / NOTE: times are shown in EST
Tuesday, April 1, 2025 5:00 PM - 6:15 PM EST
This panel investigates forms of social control in 17th century New England. Arthur George Kamya’s paper examines the regulation of distilled liquor in 17th century Massachusetts Bay Colony, exploring how authorities navigated competing moral, economic, and security imperatives. Initially targeting a cross-section of colonists, liquor laws evolved to focus on servants, Native Americans, and eventually African Americans. The colony's approach shifted from moral censure to pragmatic revenue generation, with officials using fines and licenses to fund government operations. Kamya’s study illuminates how alcohol regulation became a tool of social control, state-building, and the construction of racial hierarchies in colonial New England, offering insights into the complex interplay between commerce, governance, and identity formation in early America. As discussed in Alice King’s work, Connecticut adopted a notable strategy towards certain Indigenous populations during the initial decades of settlement, attempting to control and exploit Native communities by turning them into colonial tributaries who would provide essential supplies, wampum, and military aid. King’s paper considers the evolution of tributary politics at the end of the seventeenth century after the Dominion of New England and Glorious Revolution had destabilized colonial authority and left colonists vulnerable to attack by French and Native forces, including the Wabanaki Confederacy during King William’s War, 1689-1697, when Connecticut leaders sought to raise soldiers for New England’s defense from these historic tributary communities.
see all events

The Latest

Blog
Video
Podcast