A website from the Massachusetts Historical Society; founded 1791.

Papers of the Winthrop Family, Volume 4

Thomas Cobbett to John Winthrop1
Cobbett, Thomas JW

1644-03-13

To our honoured Gouernor and his much esteemd freind Mr. Winthop at his howse in Boston present theise I pray you
Worthy Sir,

I vnderstand that you are by Mr. Humphrey desired to take care of the dispose of his children2 wherefore I thought meet to acquaint you with a prouidence of God offering an opportunity for the comfortabl disposal of one of them. mr. Daulton of Hampton staying at one of our Brethrens howses lately Inquired after mr. Humphreys children offering to take one of them and to bring it vp as his owne hauing of his owne but one child. his 452Reason he gaue hereof was in that mr. Humphrey had formerly aduentured him self for him in england when in the High Commission Court and was a means of his liberty and therefore he would gladly thus requite that his kindeness, and beeing told hear was none in this towne but Dorcas formerly defiled etc. he replied that was indeed some Blott vppon her but yet he would be content to take her if mr. Humphreis freinds soe pleased. now Sir if you please and that you Judge it meet we shall take some care to send to Mr. Dalton that thear may be further order taken for the conueyance of her to him to Hampton. mr. Ottley is poore, and he cannot helpe her. mr. Walton is for Long Iland shortly there to sitt downe with my Lady Moody from vnder ciuill and church watch among the Dutch and albeit Dorcas be with him at present yet I suppose you will not assent to his carrying of her with him thither if he should desire it and with whome else the child should comfortably be I knowe not vnless some such like prouidence as this is be attended to and Improoued. your worship may please to expresse your minde herein to some of our Brethren that will be at Boston lecture and by them I shall vnderstand your pleasure, and accordingly act in it: beeing willing to doe any freindly office that way out of old respects vnto her Father and Mother. and thus with remembrance of all due respects to yourself and Mrs. Winthrop your wife, commending you and yours to the shadow of the wings of the Almighty I rest Yours to command in him

Tho: Cobbett lyn this 13th of the 1 m. 1643/44

if your worship please, your self may write to mr. Daulton and it will much aduantage and further the worke propounded.

1.

W. 4. 120; 5 Collections , I. 333–335.

2.

John Humfrey had returned to England in 1641. For the subsequent misfortunes of his daughters, see Journal, II. 83; also printed in D.J.W. .

Edward Winslow to John Winthrop1
Winslow, Edward JW

1644-04-06

To the right worskippfull his much honored Friend J. Winthrop Esq. Governor of the Mass. these be delivered
Honored Sir,

Yours of the 21 (1) 43 I received and haue imparted it to my partner mr. Collier. And perceiue we are like to haue some trowble about the controversie between Hartfort and the Dutch.2 The letters from the 453Swedes and Dutch3 I received and haue perused them, and according to your desire haue returned them with such advice as the Lord enableth me for answere. And first for the Dutch I obserue he writeth with great haughtines of spirit, full of confidence (as you say) yet marvell that a gentleman so well bread so great a traveller and governor of so great experience should not be more moderate in writing especially in so publike a way, witnes his uncivill termes towards mr. Hopkins, etc. whom we all know to be a man that makes conscience of his words as well as his actions.4 To many of the passages by him heer related I can say nothing, onely they agree too well with common Fame and I feare our brethren of Hartford will be found faulty in them whosoever shall haue the hearing of it. yet am ready to make good every particle of that Relacion which I gaue upon the solemn request first of your general Court, and then of the Commissioners, in regard of my experimentall knowledge of the first beginnings of them and us in Coneetacut. to which also I added certaine things which I had from Liuetenant Holmes who was over our people there. For his answer to what I affirme by that generall which he bringeth (if I should grant all he saith) how short it weare you may easily judge who to my best remembrance meddle not at all with any passages between them after they came to clash together. He saith June the 6th 1638 that I would not defend the Hartford mens cawse for they had hitherto (or thus long) wronged the Dutch. That I spake somewhat tending thereunto I acknowledge. For mr. Whiting and myselfe being at dinner with him at his table. He flew out upon me (tho' unseasonably being courteous both before and after to me) and charged me to be the man had more wronged the Dutch then any other by giving the first commission to the English (being then Governor of Plym.) to disturbe them at Coneetacutt who were possessed before us etc. But when I had taken off this charge and returned the wrong upon themselues and called Capt. Curlo being one of those fiue at dinner with us to witnes many things. Capt C. replied:

The truth is what mr. Winslow saith Sir is true nor haue we that cawse to complaine of them as of others, nay they haue as much cawse to complaine of Winsor as we haue of Hartford, for looke how the one dealeth with us so doe the other with them, etc. whereupon he turneth againe to me with Violence But will you justefie Hartford men (briefely charging them with many of the things in his letter) nay saith5 he there sits the man next to you whose howse 454stands upon our ground and hath thus and thus abused us etc. To which I replied No Sir I will not justefie Hartford men Tis sufficient I can justefie our own proceedings. But Mr. Whiting is of age let him speak for himselfe. And this I added further to it that not onely my selfe but many English did conceiue the Dutch had hard measure from them in sundry particulars if things were true that were reported. And this was all I spake to the utmost of my remembrance. And these were my words the occasion beginning and end of them. But what is this to answ. that I affirme. That I had a place given (and the place we after possessed) the yeare before the Dutch began in the River. That the Dutch came in by way of prevention and stept in between us and our purpose etc. That this was done without special order From either the States or their masters the West India Company and so confessed by C. Curlo. That the River was not Vacuum domicilium. but inhabited the yeare before etc. That they bought of Tatobam, whose title to the River was by conquest. That I brought in Attawanyut and there left him where he lived and died vpon the ground whom Tatobam the Tyrant had before exspelled by war. That this Attawanyut by the relacion of Liuetenant Holmes if he would haue given way to it would haue cut off the Dutch becawse they entred by Tatobam. I cannot remember all the particulars of that I gaue under my owne hand writing but one thing more of great consequence I call to minde That Tatobam for so we termed him after he had chid me for bringing in his mortall enemy and countenancing him as I did would haue had me (when indeed hee durst not attempt againe vpon him) to haue given him but a knife or but an awle blade for his consent to what I had don which I utterly refused, etc. Now good Sir I pray consider what contradiccion is heer between my testimony given at your request etc. and either my words as they were by me spoken, or as he pens them and would haue them. But the truth is I could say more about their entrance and the unworthines of it if I would bring our Governor on the stage but will not Write it under hand without his leaue. I perceiue there is no likelihood of Arbiterment heer because he conceiues no Abitracion faire unles it be between some Royall persons or invested with supreame authority, otherwise I should advise he might haue notice of our meeting next at Coneetacut where they haue a Fort to receiue him as he terms it. But if the States favor the Parliament, it may easily be either there ended or such Commission procured either to informe them, there, or heer end the controversie as hee demandeth. I suppose the late deputed Commissioners notwithstanding their weighty occasions in Engl. would be brought to do somewhat in it, nay how easie were it for mr. Peeters to goe furnished with Commission to end it in Holland. 455As for the controversie between Mr. Lamberton and them,6 we heare their yea and his nay. nor doe I know how we can right our Friends of New Haven in any other way then already by the Commission you gaue them, unles he would giue meeting as before which I conceiue he neither can nor will.

The Swedish Letter I haue also perused and conceiue it not the worst way to defer answere till you either heare againe from New Haven or understand what force your Commission hath in those parts. For I suppose its in use ere now.

I thank you for your large and painefull relacion of the State of Engl. at present. The Lord in mercy look vpon his people and help forward his owne cawse. Thus saluting your selfe and Mr. Dudley etc. in the Lord Jesus with my due respects to both of you and all yours humbly take leaue and remaine Yours till death

Edw: Winslow Marshfield (2) 6. 44

Endorsed by Governor Winthrop: Mr. Winslow about the Answ: from the Sw: and Dutch.

1.

Original not located; N. E. Historical and Genealogical Register, XXIX. 237–240; Nathaniel Morton, New England's Memorial, 5th edition, John Davis, Editor (Boston, 1826), 394–396 (extract). The text here printed is, with two exceptions noted below, taken from the Register.

2.

Cf. Journal, II. 132–134; also printed in D.J.W. at 468 .

3.

I.e., from the Director Generals of New Sweden and New Netherland, in reply to letters from the Commissioners of the United Colonies. Records of the Colony of New Plymouth: Acts of the Commissioners of the United Colonies in New England, I (Boston, 1859), 13.

4.

The word in the Register text of this letter is “accounts.”

5.

The word in the Register text of this letter is “sez.”

6.

Cf. Calder, The New Haven Colony, 185–187.