Papers of the Winthrop Family, Volume 4
1640-09-30
I should not haue needed your last as a spurre to mee to write, had not my thoughts about yourselfe bin so succesles that I lost all courage that way, and am also at present fallen into a sore fit of my old hypocondriacal melancholy, through cold and care. My hartyest desires are for you and yours, and I could wish I knew what to doe to compas my purposes.
What my aduenture was at Pascataway I suppose Mr. Larkham2 hath told you, and if death preuent not, I shall my selfe shortly. In the meane tyme remember mee where you may doe mee the most good, and I shall striue to retaliate.
The last newes sayes the Convocation3 made 17 new Canons, wherof one is that all ministers shall preach 2ce per annum for conformity, and 4 tymes for the Kings prerogative: what past betwixt Mr. Williams at Pasc
De nuptiis, nihil habeo praeter aetatem quod displicet, videntur satis optandae.
Salute the good gentlewom
W. 2. 57; 4
Collections
, VI. 107–108.
The Reverend Thomas Larkham, leader of the church faction in Dover, New Hampshire, which was opposed to the Reverend Hanserd Knollys.
The Convocation of the Province of Canterbury, which met in April and May, 1640. Samuel R. Gardiner, History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War (London and New York, 1904), IX. 108, 142–148.
1640-10-05
vpon my motion at the last Generall Court for an Exposition of our Grant (occasioned by the questioning of some) Mr. Broadstreete desiring. some of the land granted to vs on the one side, and 290Mr. Woodbridge on the other, opposition was made contrary to my exspectation, and noise raised to my greife; though the lesse because we were but the occasion, and others the cause. Yet to preuent euen that also, if it be possible, I am bolde to make this addresse to yourselfe; rather then to come personally to the Court, except I shall heare it to be necessary.
You best knowe how oft we expressed ourselues, and how plainly, concerning our desired bounds, as Ipsw
We are loth to say all we might, except we be vrged. The second thing objected is, the words of the Grant, as it is recorded, that mention (they say) only eight miles euery waye. I answere that I suppose that might (if it be so) arise from hence, that many in the Court did not doubt, but that eight miles did afford vs our desired bounds: but this we say, that if we could not haue them vnder eighteene miles, we were to haue so much as did reach them. And it seemes the Register only looked at the Text not comment. And it wilbe prooued by good wittnesse, if neede be; That Newbery men desiring two miles more by Merimack, your selfe instantly replyed (which I heard 291hisce auribus) that that could not be, because it was granted already to vs. So that the notion of eight miles was not the main matter, but Merimacke.
Sir, I am hartely sory thus farre to trouble you: but your wisdome will see a necessity, and therfore pardon. I humbly beseech you to acquaint our worthy Gouernour herwith, and so many of the Court, as you see fitt, or the whole.2 I am sory also to thinke how harsh such things are like to be in England and Quillipiake, as they are like to be carryed thither quickly, if they be noised in open Court, so that it were well if that were preuented. It hath bene a trouble of late to my poore neighbours (though a quiet people) to heare of this, after their purchase and building, and returne from Quillipyake. Especially, since they heard that Mr. Broadstreete plainly in open Court saide he exspected land there, and therupon opposed vs; as I haue signifyed to himselfe, and doe thus write, because he still saide he intended to doe so. Though happily, if your selfe doe satisfy him, he will forbeare. But I forgett your trouble, therfore againe crauing pardon, with my seruice I rest Yours to commande
W. 3. 58; 4
Collections
, VII. 215–217.
The General Court took action on October 7, 1640, to satisfy Rowley's grievances regarding the boundaries of the town. Records of Massachusetts, I. 305; Journal, II. 15–16D.J.W.