A website from the Massachusetts Historical Society; founded 1791.

Robert Treat Paine Papers, Volume 2

beta
From Edward Winslow
Winslow, Edward RTP
Plimo. Feb. 2 11765. Sir,

I this moment receiv'd yo'rs, And your demand for more blanks is Oweing to the increase of your Business, or rather to other peoples knowlege and acquaintaince of yor. Abilities & Integrety is to me beyond doubt.

Notwithstanding my hurry at this Juncture I shou'd think myselfe unpardonable were I to Omitt mentioning an affaire in which both my Eyes and Ears were witnesses to, the knowledge of which may be of the utmost importance and benificial to you. The Case was thus, I went to Mr. G—n,2 of this town upon Business, a few days since, upon my being admitted wch. was some time first, I found Colo. W—n3 & him verry attentive & pensive over a large fire of Green wood & Charcoal: and altho, I ask'd them several questions could get no answers, Concludeing they were upon Matters that I had No Concern with was about withdrawing when I was urgd to tarry, upon which the Colo. told me they were322then trying an Experiment in Order to prove the Genuiness of some Marl found in G—ns land and that it answer'd to all intents & purposes.

The method of proveing it was by throwing a handfull thereof into the fire, and if there Insued a Snaping soon after, it was pronounc'd Good and of the right Stamp. I saw Several handfulls thrown into the fire, and also heard a Snaping.

Quæ., (if it was not the marl) & 2ly if it is not profe to demonstration that it is Genuine. Mr. G. has so much faith from this Experiment that he has contracted for the diging of a large quantity thereof, and wishing that you might be so lucky as to find a quantity Sufficient of this hidden Treasure as to cover all your Lucern Induc'd me to give you the above Information, if it shoud be any ways Serviceable my Ends are answerd. I am Sr. yor. most Humle. Servt.,

EDW WINSLOW

Que, if a fire made of Sassifax wood & Oake Coal would not be best to try the Experiment.

RC ; addressed: "Robert Tt. Paine Esqr."; endorsed

1.

Manuscript torn.

2.

Unidentified, probably a member of the large Goodwin family of Plymouth.

3.

James Warren (1726–1808) held many civil offices in Plymouth County before entering politics in 1764. He was to become a close friend and ally of John Adams and one of the leaders in the resistance movement. He married Mercy Otis (1728–1814), daughter of Col. James and Mary (Allyne) Otis of Barnstable, in 1754. The sister of James Otis, the patriot, she was to become a literary figure in the Revolutionary years (Sibley's Harvard Graduates, 11:584–606).

From Samuel White
White, Samuel RTP
Boston Febry. 21, 1765 Sir,

The act for altering the Several Infr. Courts thrô the Government is passed & will be in this days papers.1So that all Writs now to be filed for our County must be to the first Tuesday in May next as I suppose. However I conclude you will see the act & Judge for your self. It's uncertain whether the Court will rise this week I rather think it will not. The Excise Bill & fee Bill occasion great Difficulty2, & whether they will be got thrô this Sessions is Doubtfull. We have no remarkable news. Please to let me know my family know I am well. yrs. &c.

SAML. WHITE 323

monday morning 25 feb. 1765. I had no opportunity of sending to you last week not seeing one person from our your way in Town. have herewith sent you the act. yr.

S.W

RC ; addressed: "To Robert Treat Paine esqr. In Taunton"; endorsed. Case notes and numerical tallies on the address leaf.

1.

"An Act determining at what Times and Places the several Inferior Courts of Common Pleas and Courts of General Sessions of the Peace shall be held within and for the several Counties of the Province for the future" was passed by the House of Representatives on Feb. 19, by the Council on Feb. 26, and enacted on Mar. 2 (Journals of the House of Representatives, 41:256, 282, 286).

2.

A bill regulating fees of the Province's civil officers was rejected twice by the House on the same day and returned to the Senate. The House also resumed consideration of an excise bill, but after a long debate, voted for further consideration of it (Journal of the House of Representatives, 41:256, 260).