A website from the Massachusetts Historical Society; founded 1791.

Robert Treat Paine Papers, Volume 3

beta

From Nicholas Brown

24 August 1777

To Joseph Nourse

8 September 1777
From Nicholas Brown
Brown, Nicholas RTP
Esq. Pain Sir, Providence Sepr. 1st. 1777

I wrote you sum days ago at the request of Mr. Benja: Cuzens, who went on purpose to see you at Taunton on Monday last, But you did not happen to be at home. The Letr. refer’d to if you have recd: it, will give you sum hint of 2 hhds. Melass. belonging to sd. Cuzens, & 20 bbls. flour belonging to me all wch. was siez’d by the Comte: of Attlebury as it was bringing from Bedford to this Town. We have both Made proof on Oath of the Property, & delvd. it to the Chairman of sd. Comte. Since Cuzens returned from Taunton we have ben Inform’d, sd. Comte. reported the Goods to Court, and are Determined to Injure us all they Can by way of Expense if they Cant get it Condemned to them, as they have sd. they thought the flour not worth my Attention at Court & that Cuzens being a poor man they Could Manage at Pleasure.

I think Sr. this Comte. have Acted a very Strange & Suspissious part, & appear to me to have a Wicked design of holding the Goods. For I my self, after Sum time found the Boston papers wch. Contained the Act Allowing us to Transport Goods thro’ your State &c. and presented to the Comte. of Rehobath sum time ago who on sight of it (as they say’d they had no knowledge of sd. Act before) give up a parcel of Flour & other Goods they had seiz’d. Afterwards I sent sd. Act to the Comte. of Attlebury, and they also 388Declar’d they had no knowledge of it but still pretend they have found sumthing by wch. we are lyable wch. is an Oath we was to give in According to sd. Act within 30 Days of the Siezour—which we Could have done in season if we had not Intrusted them with the Law which they did not return us According to promise for want of wch. we have Overrun the Time. I hope your Courts will not suffer the People of these neighbouring States to be Tricked out of there Just property by such Ignorant Designing men.

Pray Sir is there no way to get Satisfaction for this sort of Treatment; if there is, by Law, we shall be glad to Imploy you to get Justice done us & to Punish those Persons. But we are Informed they give out that you had Undertaken for them & Enterd the Information to your Court &c. Nevertheless I am fully perswaded from your well known Charactor, That you will not ingage to support Such Wicked & Designing men. Your Assistance to Mr. Cuzens (as the 2 hhds. Melasss. is of much Importance to him) will not only Tend to Save the Credit of your Whole state but much Oblige him who is needy, and your very Esteem’d Humle. Servt.

Nicho: Brown

P.S. This is the Same flour wch. I mention in a Letr. to Brother John Brown while in Boston, sum time ago & wch. he then gave you Sum notice about. I doubt not but the flour by this Time is much Damaged, and not near the Value it wod be if Good & Sweet for wch. the Holders of it ought to make Good at least the Damagable.

RC ; addressed: “To The Honbl. Robert Pain Esqr. at Taunton”; endorsed; on the same sheet as Nicholas Brown to RTP, Sept. 8, 1777 (below).