A website from the Massachusetts Historical Society; founded 1791.

Robert Treat Paine Papers, Volume 1

beta

From Timothy Harrington

24 March 1755

From Joseph Greenleaf

27 March 1755
To Timothy Harrington
RTP Harrington, Timothy
Lancaster. after March 24, 1755 Revd. Sr.,

I recd. yr. favr., (for such I esteem all assistance to an unprejudiced Enquiry after Truth). As to yr. Queerys, if you have the copy, or remember them twill save me the trouble to transcribe.

1. Whether the Aboriginals of America are Proprietors by prior Possession? Prior possession by the Law of Nations is esteem'd a just Title to Propriety, of so much as is possess'd, & nothing appears but the Indians had it.

2. Whether the Posterity of the Europeans have a good Title &c.? Reprisals or agreemt. only give Title.

3. If the Natives may admit the French &c. yes surely, to their unimcumber'd Property.

4. If the English have no Title to Ohio, & the Native Propietors would intoduce the French who are disabled from receiving by the Treaty of Utretcht, how does this affect the Natives? No way immediately. They have a right of Conveyance, but the French have not a right of Acceptance; and can be no more benefited by the Natives Liberty, than the Natives are obliged by their Treaty of Utrecht. Ergo it does not as yet appear inconsistent wth. the Law of Nature & Nations for the English to hinder the French Settling Ohio even tho' the Natives have a Right to enfeoff them, unless you'll say it be inconsistent likewise to keep Treatys.

Please to correct Errors, & consider the following Queeres as further answers to yrs.

1. If there had been but one Man found in America, would he have been sole Proprietor? And whether his denying admission to the English (Europeans) would have been a Sufficient Barr?

2. How much Land does a Victory over the Indians give the Conqueror?

253

3. Has not the Territorys of Ohio been purchased by the English, or at least the Refusal of them, or the Property Some Ways encumbred?

4. Allowing the Ohio no property of the English, & the Indians a Natural Right of Induction, yet Quere if the Encroachmt. of the French upon other Frontiers be not Sufficient breach of Peace to empower us hindring their fortifying a Bordering Land we have no Property in? If the Indians Ally wth. our Enemies, is not that Sufficient to declare them Enemies, & justify hostile proceedings in their Land? If they pretend to be Neutral, yet does not a fortress built on our Boundary Annoy us hience the destruction of it.

Dft ; addressed: "To Revd. T: Harrington Lancaster."