Papers of John Adams, volume 21
A few days ago, I received from England, together, your
favours of March 25. May 5. and June 10. The two first were brought to
London and forwarded from thence by Mr: Cook,
whom as recommended by you, I shall be happy to see either here or in
England, if his or my peregrinations should at any time bring us within
reach of each other. At the same time I received with several other letters
one from the Secretary of State dated June 11. one day later than the last
from you.1 But various
circumstances induce me to believe the purport of its contents were then
unknown to you, and even unexpected. You will perhaps think them rationally
sufficient to induce a submission to the ostracism a little longer.
Your indifference concerning the event of a possible future competition; the determination to be altogether passive, and the 497 intrepedity with which the prospects of either decision are contemplated I readily believe; and rejoice in believing them, because I have no doubt but that the transaction will call for the exercise of all those qualities in an eminent degree. Besides the innumerable sources of opposition, all native Americans, and the principles of whose are so fully unfolded in your great political work, you will expect all the art and intrigue of France, and all its weight and influence concerted with the american adverse party, in formal array displayed against you. Their talents at political manoeuvre, are well known and appreciated by you. The range of their means comprehending everything that can be atchieved, and limited by no scruple of general morality is understood. The popularity of their pretexts, the terror of their brilliant success in War, and the natural disposition among men of cringing before the insolence of victory, are duely estimated. You will also be prepared I presume for an opposition equally malignant, though more concealed, and perhaps during the first period altogether inactive, from the rival influence of G. Britain. nor are you unaware of the dangers to which the station at the helm will be exposed, at the most tempestuous political season that the world perhaps ever witnessed, when the elements of civil Society are rapidly and inevitably returning to Chaos in Europe, and at a moment when the fame of the predecessor has heaped to such accumulation the burden of the successor’s task. All, I am well convinced has been maturely weighed. It remains for me as a Man, as an American, and as your Son, only to say, quod felix, faustumque sit!2
Since I wrote you last many important events have occurred serving to unfold the views of the french Government, and they all tend to confirm the certainty of that system of policy which has made the subject of many of my former letters to you, and which I have hinted with more caution in some of my letters to the Secretary of State, because I have felt myself more at liberty to indulge in conjecture, in a private correspondence, than when official responsibility is attached to the accuracy of opinions. The french armies upon the Rhine have been not much less successful than that of Italy had been before. The campaign is not yet terminated, but the Duke of Wirtemberg and the Margrave of Baden have purchased a cessation of hostilities and with many other of the German Princes are negotiating their separate Peace.3 The king of Prussia on his side is encroaching upon the imperial dominions and has taken quiet possession of the City of Nurenberg. The Empire is to be dissolved entirely and the House of Austria reduced to the hereditary 498 possessions. A new Empire or confederation is to be formed at the head of which the king of Prussia, in alliance with France is to be placed, and perhaps the Duke of Brunswick’s retreat from Champagne in 1792 may be cleared of some part of the obscurity with which it has been surrounded, by the arrangements which are on the point of being put into effect.— These arrangements are of the greatest importance to the political system of Europe, and will perhaps give the final blow to that balance which the first division of Poland invaded.4 An entirely new order of political combination is formed, for all Europe, and there is every prospect at present that it will be effected. The french Government has formally assumed for a principle of their negotiations that G. Britain shall not interfere in any of the continental arrangements. They are preparing for the expected event of a struggle with her alone, and pursue the system of taking the markets of the world from her commerce with a degree of ardour uncontrouled by any regard for other nations or for their own stipulations. They have seriously determined to produce a Revolution of Government in Great Britain, and as they have very powerful means of Execution they flatter themselves with the hope of success. The plan appears to me very extravagant, but in the present State of Europe, it is impossible to predict what its Event will be. Probably they will grow sick of their revolutionary scheme, and settle at length in a Peace in which both parties will take breath to begin again a War more furious even than the present.
They have proceeded in their purposes to obtain
possession of the Coast of Italy.5 The property belonging to their
Enemies which they found at Leghorn, they have taken under the pretext of
considering it as property captured at Sea.
They have not yet absolutely taken similar possession of Genoa, but they are
endeavouring to pick a quarrel with the Government of that Republic, and
already threaten them in their usual tone.
The british fleet in the mediterranean has blockaded Leghorn, and they have in their turn taken possession of Porto Ferrajo in the island of Elba, which they say they hold merely to prevent the french from taking it in order to direct from thence an expedition against Corsica. A number of privateers have been fitted out from Corsica to intercept the french commerce in the mediterranean, who are said to have taken some neutral vessels bound to Leghorn.— This circumstance has furnished the french Government with an occasion to bring forward another instrument of their new system, of which I have no doubt but you will hear much in America.
499The political agents of France, with all the neutral
Governments, are directed to address to them with
Energy, the voice of their own
Interest, and after telling them that they are upon the point of
being made the victims of English Ambition, to declare: “that the french
Government are informed, the English have issued new positive orders to
their commanders of armed vessels to seize all cargoes destinés aux François, in neutral vessels; and
that the commanders of the Squadrons and Privateers of the Republic are
ordered to treat the vessels of the neutral Nations, in the same manner as
their Governments shall suffer the English
to treat them.” This is to be stated as an act of reprizal against the
British, and is to be seasoned with proper encomiums upon the honour and
generosity of France, and upon her profound respect for the Laws of Nations,
the only tie and security of civilized
life, as well as with proper sallies against the perfidy, and
Machiavelian policy of Britain.— In connection with this may be mentioned
that Mr: Adet, is to be recalled, and Mangourit, the
former noted Consul at Charleston appointed to succeed him.6 Mangourit is now secretary to the
french legation in Spain.— You have doubtless heard that it has been in
contemplation between France and Spain to exchange the part of
Saint-Domingo, ceded to the former by the late Treaty of Peace, for
Louisiana, upon our Continent.— There is at present in Paris one if not more
of the South-Carolinians who accepted the Commissions of Genet, and drew
upon themselves the animadversions of the S. Carolina legislature.7 He has made himself very
conspicuous among the Americans, by every species of censure upon the
President, and the Government of the United States. He has probably too much
encouragement for such conduct and conversation, which by means of him and
of other similar characters is so industriously spread among the Americans
in Paris, as to make the french naturally conclude it must be the general
public opinion in America. Several facts are here mentioned together, and
you will probably be aware that they are not grouped altogether at random.
Their connection will perhaps be much better understood by you, than it is
comprehended by me.— Our Country must be upon its guard. I must add however
that I am informed it is probable another person may be appointed, instead
of Mangourît.
Mr: Pain is said to be yet
writing his pamphlet against the President of the United States, and his
administration, but he does not now live in the house of Mr: Monroe. He has retired to Surenne a village
near Paris.— There was much threatening of this pamphlet, and of this new
mission, last Winter, but the latter measure was 500 suspended by the french Government,
perhaps to give our House of Representatives an opportunity to refuse their
concurrence for the Execution of our Treaty with Britain.— At present; the
threat at least of both the measures is revived. The pamphlet war against
the character of the President, was begun under the auspices of the french
Government, the last Summer. If it is now to be renewed it will be still
under their auspices, but they may perhaps
discover that his personal feelings and fortunes are as inaccessible to
their attacks, as his fame. But as panegyric and calumny are equally among
their means and they are perfectly indifferent which of them it is they
employ, the choice is decided by circumstances only and they will at an
hour’s warning be prepared to erect a statue to him whom they find they
cannot ruin.
But measures and not men is
their maxim, and their only means of destroying a system, is by attacking
the person upon whom they suppose its support to depend. It may therefore be
expected that the french Government and their pamphleteers will from the
same batteries only change the direction of their Artillery. The object will
remain the same: to force us out of our
neutrality; to deprive us at least of all connection with Britain, and to
alter our Constitution to such a form, as shall give them a more certain and
effectual influence over our national Executive.
The energetic mode in which
they purpose to shew the neutral Governments their
own Interests, and this appointment of Mangourit indicates that
they mean to resume the system of terror, in their external relations, and
if I judge from the letters I receive from some of their adherents, they
imagine, that these new measures will throw the American Government into
such a profound consternation that they will think themselves fortunate to
obtain forgiveness by unqualified submission. They tell me of the rage of the french Government at our Treaty
with Britain, of their inflexible determination
to resent it by some determined act, of their
raising their tone as they advance in
victory, of the dreadful consequences to be apprehended from their
resentments, and which nothing under Heaven can avert unless it be
peradventure the extreme prudence of Mr: Monroe,
in whom they have very great confidence.— It is
from native Americans that I receive under hand and seal this language fit
for the remorse of a worm of the dust, in the presence of offended
omnipotence; from a man particularly from Pennsylvania, a deep speculator in
the french revolutionary funds,8 and a confidential friend 501 of Mr:
Monroe, together with Hichborn, whose conversation was of exactly the same
complection more than a twelve-month ago.
The Drawcansir style9 of these letters would divert you,
if you should see them, because the intention with which they were written
would be discerned by you at once. They profess to be confidential
communications, but are so far from really possessing that character, that
while they are all foaming with the froth of french indignation, they
studiously conceal the measures which the
Directory had determined to pursue, and which must have been known to the
writer, at the time when he wrote. Neither the orders to take enemy’s
property in neutral vessels, nor the recall of Adet, nor the appointment of
Mangourît were hinted to me by him. My intelligence comes from other quarters.
If they really mean to confiscate only enemy’s property,
found in neutral vessels, that indeed will be an act violent and unjust
enough considering it as a direct and positive violation of the stipulation
in our Treaty; yet considering that our vessels will be like to have but
little property to carry belonging to their enemies, and also that they
cannot keep many armed vessels in any sea, to infest our trade, owing to the
naval superior force of their antagonist, I think they will not injure us
much by this. If its eventual issue should be such as to controul in some
degree the overflowings of our commercial enterprize, a benefit may result
from it, as it will weaken the shock of a diminished trade, that must await
us at the termination of a War, when all the parties now contending will
encourage as much as possible their domestic navigation by the exclusion of
that of strangers. But from the very vague manner in which the orders
intimated to have been issued, are expressed, they may design to extend the practice of depredation much further than
the British ever have. They probably do not intend to treat us as the
British have done this Season, at least in
these European Seas; for they have not as I hear captured a single vessel
for months past; though they have an undisputed command of the Seas, and
board almost every neutral vessel that floats upon them, they let them all
pass, and there are numbers of Americans arriving now every day in the ports
of this Republic as well as in those of France.
If the admiralty Courts of France are to condemn all the
property found on board neutral vessels, destinés
aux ennemis de la Republique Française, and this expression is to
be understood in all the latitude of which it is susceptible, it will be a
treatment much more 502
injurious than ever we have experienced from the British, as it will assume
the principle of intercepting all our navigation whatsoever destined to the
Ports of the nations at enmity with France. But I cannot believe this to be
the intention. The manner in which the orders are executed will soon
discover the design. I only give you conjectures, which with other
circumstances perceptible to you, though unknown to me may have a tendency
to prepare you for the explosion of the mine that is working.
I am unwilling to believe that the french Government has
been taught to found the support of their influence in the United States
upon a wretched distinction between the policy and interest of one part of
the Union in opposition to those of another, or that they have been induced
to suppose they could gratify and promote its agriculture by distressing its
commercial power. I sometimes imagine that this recent order is rather meant
as a false attack, to avert the attention of our Government from another
more formidable which they keep in reserve.— It has indeed been hinted that
they had thought of stopping their payment to those of our Citizens to whom
they are indebted, untill our Government shall have reclaimed the property
taken from our vessels belonging to the inhabitants of St: Domingo.— That they will catch at any pretext
to stop their payments is very probable, since they have in many instances
already stopped them without any pretext at all, except that of their own
necessity. They have so many of the beasts with great bellies, which must be
fed, that plenteous as their plunder has been during the present campaign,
their finances have become more and more irretrievable from day to day. But
as this measure has been formally announced, I question much whether it will
be employed.
It is proper however that you should be aware, that to
all appearance they have seriously resumed the plan of revolutionizing the whole world, so openly professed by the
Brissotine party in 1792, though at present they think proper totally to
deny such a design.— I have reason to believe however that they are fomenting stirring up the leas of
democracy among their friends the Danes, and even in the dominions of their
intended dear Prussian ally. In the states of all the German Princes they
are indefatigable, and are working upon materials, which require scarce any
thing but the accidental spark to kindle a flame as devouring as that of
France.— The Directory have persisted in their refusal to receive the Baron
de Rehausen, as chargé des affaires from Sweden, and have ordered him to
leave Paris.10 They have
further ordered their chargé des affaires in Sweden to leave 503 Stockholm, after assuring the Swedish
Nation of the friendship of the french
Republic. There are some obscure symptoms, indicating their disposition at
the present juncture to inflame a political odium against the Government of
Venice; and in Geneva there has been it is said a new Insurrection, in which
the People deposed all their magistrates, and requested the french Resident provisionally to supply
their places.11
In the midst of all these revolutionary projects, the
Directory, is not itself without internal enemies equally disposed to
overturn them and their constitution. It has been openly avowed as the
object of the conspiracy at the head of which were Drouet and Baboeuf. The
trial of those persons is not yet completed. At the annual municipal
elections, they were attended with tumult and massacre at Marseilles, at Aix
and several other places in the Southern Departments. At Paris, the
Directory were so apprehensive of similar consequences that they found it
expedient to address a proclamation to the People warning them against the
designs of the terrorists; and the renewal of one third of the legislative
councils at this moment is a period of particular anxiety to them. The
rebellion in the Vendee appears to be finally quelled entirely, and the
inhabitants are all disarmed. Paris is yet nearly in the same State, and has
besides an army of sixty thousand men to secure its tranquility close at its
gates.— The Government itself is said not to be united. Sieyes is opposed to their prevailing system,
or at least preparing to abandon them in case of need. Their Minister of
foreign affairs, if not involved more or less in the affair of Drouet,
favours at least the terrorist party as much as he can. It is intimated,
that he keeps secret agents in foreign Countries to act as spies upon the
public acknowledged Ministers appointed by the Directory. One of the
Ministers from this Republic in France, and the Minister of Geneva, have
been removed, owing to some kind of connection with the intrigue of
Drouet.12 The General
Buonaparte in Italy, is said to pay them but little respect, and rumours
with regard to him have circulated, which the Directory have thought it
necessary positively to contradict. They employ the same pamphleteering
engines, to fix themselves that they use to unseat every other Government,
and while with one hand they are endeavouring to tear up every root of
confidence in settled establishments, with the other they are imploring for
themselves the confidence of their own people, and of foreign nations
without being able to obtain it.
From repeated intimations which have been made to me by
the Danish Legation here, with which I have been upon very friendly 504 terms, from my first acquaintance
with the Minister and the Secretary, I find that the Government of Denmark,
would be pleased to have an exchange of Ministers between the United States
and them.13 They doubtless
expect the compliment of receiving the first, as the eldest party, but if
they were sure of a return, I know not but they
would overlook the mere point of sending first. It has been hinted to me,
that while the United States have Ministers with almost all the commercial
Powers in Europe, it looks something like an unpleasant distinction to see
them omit sending one to that which commands the passage of the Sound, and
with which the United States have already a considerable direct commerce. I
have never mentioned these circumstances before for two reasons. The first,
because I had no inclination to promote the multiplication of the American
foreign Missions unnecessarily; and the second, because I thought it might
tend to raise a suspicion of a personal motive on my part, founded upon the
desire to enlarge our diplomatic field. Under my present destination the
latter cannot influence me, and I pretend not to judge of the necessity, or
propriety of the measure. I only state a fact and an argument as it has been
presented to me, by persons who certainly did not use them without
authority.
Your dutiful Son
P. S. Our old friend Dumas, died suddenly on the
11th: instt:
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “J. Q. A. No. 24 / Aug. 13. / 1796.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 128. FC-Pr (Adams Papers); APM Reel 131.
Tr (Adams
Papers).
AFC
, 11:284–285. In his 25 March and 10 June letters to
JQA (both Adams
Papers), JA commented on the progress of the Jay
Treaty and JQA’s career prospects. Richard Cooke Tilghman
(1772–1853), of Queen Anne’s County, Md., carried these letters for
JA (
AFC
, 11:231).
JQA had also received Timothy Pickering’s 11 June
missive (Adams Papers),
notifying him of his new posting to Portugal, for which see Pickering’s 5 Sept.
letter, and note 3, below (JQA, Writings
,
1:494–495).
May this prove fortunate and auspicious.
Frederick Eugène, Duke of Würtemberg (d. 1797),
secured the armistice signed at Baden on 17 July, pledging 4 million
livres and provisions to France. Frederick, Margrave of Baden
(1728–1811), signed a similar agreement at Stuttgart on 25 July, paying
2 million livres and supplying provisions and food (H. Morse Stephens,
Revolutionary Europe 1789–1815, London,
1897, p. 386, 394; Coleman Phillipson, Termination of War and Treaties of Peace, N.Y., 1916, p.
271).
To date, Poland had undergone three partitions, in
1772, 1793, and 1795 (
AFC
, 10:408).
For the French Army’s surge into Italy, see JQA’s 4 April 1796
letter, and note 3, above. British forces were able to stave
off French attacks in the region until November, when dwindling
reinforcements and the threat of a joint Franco-Spanish attack led them
to evacuate Corsica and withdraw the British Navy from the Mediterranean
(
AFC
, 11:408).
For Pierre Auguste Adet, see JQA’s 4 April letter, and note 8,
above. Michel Ange Bernard de Mangourit (1752–1829), who previously
served as the French consul at Charleston, S.C., was named chargé
d’affaires to the United States, but the appointment was withdrawn after
James Monroe objected (
AFC
, 11:353).
These men were South Carolinians who accepted Edmond
Charles Genet’s military 505
and privateering commissions, including William Tate, Jacob Roberts
Brown, William Urby, Robert Tate, and Richard Speake (Washington, Papers, Presidential Series
,
14:483–484).
This was Enoch Edwards, for whom see John Jay’s 27 July 1794
letter, and note 1, above. Edwards wrote to JQA
on 20 June 1796 and 13 July (both Adams Papers), describing French reactions to the Jay Treaty
and the state of foreign affairs during his visit to Paris. For
JQA’s relationship with Edwards, see
AFC
, 11:437–438.
Drawcansir was a fictional character in George
Villiers’ play The Rehearsal, London, 1671,
who kills all combatants “sparing neither friend nor foe.”
Following the recall of Erik Magnus, Baron Staël von
Holstein, the Swedish regent, Karl, Duke of Södermanland, sent Gottfried
Mauritz, Baron von Rehausen, to act as chargé d’affaires, and he was
also refused recognition by the French Directory (from JQA, 24 June, and note 6,
above; Hamilton, Papers
, 20:493).
During May 1796, a Franco-Austrian armistice briefly
cooled the main conflict. But Napoleon’s campaign into Italy and
Switzerland resumed in the spring and increasingly met with pockets of
resistance. On 17 Oct. 1797 Austria and France signed the Treaty of
Campo Formio, which awarded Venice, Dalmatia, and Istria to Austria
(
AFC
, 11:xxxiii–xxxiv; 12:272).
JQA summarized the ripple effects of a
May 1796 conspiracy to overthrow the French Directory led by François
Noël Babeuf, a counterrevolutionary journalist and a member of the Paris
Société des Égaux. With the support of Jean Baptiste Drouet and others,
Babeuf sought to dissolve the government and revert all land to the
state, but the plot was discovered. Drouet escaped on 18 Aug. and fled
to the Canary Islands; Babeuf was executed on 27 May 1797. Both Jacob
Blaauw, the Dutch minister plenipotentiary to France, and Étienne
Salomon Reybaz, the Genevan minister in Paris, departed their posts in
1796 (
AFC
, 11:313–314;
Repertorium
, 3:263, 419).
JQA frequently enjoyed socializing with
Baron Hermann von Schubart (1756–1832), who served as the Danish envoy
extraordinary to the Netherlands from 1789 to 1797. Henry Wheaton
(1785–1848) served as the first U.S. chargé d’affaires to Denmark from
1827 to 1835 (
AFC
, 12:120;
Jefferson, Papers, Retirement Series
, 3:46,
47).
d.1796
Mr Ames would be honor’d & no less aided by the grounds & principles (tho’ even so breifly Stated) of the V. President’s
opinion in the case of Hannah Beale vs 1 Beale As the lineal descendent of
the V. Presidt’s office, Mr A. has the honor of
his law ancestry to support. Even this is scarcely enough to satisfy him
that his request is not too bold. If it should be thought so, he will
reinforce his apology as well as he can. No eye but Mr A’s own shall See any
such communication.
Mr Ames takes the occasion to offer his most respectful regards to Mrs Adams.
RC (PHi:Frank M. Etting Coll.); addressed: “The
V. President / of the U. States”; docketed: “Note from Fisher Ames /
23d Aug 1796 to J. Adams”; and by
JA: “Fisher Ames.”
Blank in MS. This case was the divorce
between Hannah Baxter (b. 1730) and Capt. Benjamin Beale Sr.
(1702–1793), which was finalized on 1 Sept. 1764 (
AFC
, 11:149; Sprague, Braintree
Families
).