Papers of John Adams, volume 21
th.1796.
In obedience to the order of the Senate, of the 23d of December 1795,1 I have now the honour to transmit,
“a return marked (A) of the Exports of the United States, supplemental to
that transmitted on the 26th. of February
1795,2 which compleats
the returns of 439
Exports to the 30th. of September 1794.”— A
similar Return for the year ending September 30th. 1795 is preparing, and will be transmitted as soon as
possible.
The order of the Senate above refered to, directs me to
transmit Returns of the Imports of the United
States, similar to those heretofore exhibited.— On examination I find, that
Returns relating to the Imports, have been presented to Congress in various
forms.— It appears however that Returns ’til the 30th. of September 1792 were exhibited, shewing as particularly as
the documents in the Treasury would admit, not only the specific articles
imported, but also the Countries from which the importations were made.— The
compilation of these returns was however found to be attended with a heavy
expence of Clerkship, and with delays & embarrassments to the business
of the Department, far exceeding any advantages likely to be derived from
the information which they would exhibit—of course no measures have been
taken for preparing Returns, in the form beforementioned, since the
completion of that for the Year ending on the 30th. of September 1792.3
To satisfy the resolution of the Senate as nearly as is
now in my power, I have however directed “a Statement to be prepared &
which is herewith transmitted marked (B.) shewing the specific Articles
imported into the United States in each Calendar year, commencing with the
establishment of the Revenue, and ending on the 30th. of December 1794.” being the latest period to which the
records of Imports have been compleated.
The Abstract marked (C) contains a list of the Articles of Merchandise enumerated in the Laws of the United States, as being subject to Ad valorem rates of duty, prior to the Year 1795.— It is hoped that an examination & comparison of this document with the Return marked (B) will substantially satisfy the principal objects of enquiry— If however the Senate shall be pleased so to direct, arrangements shall be made, for complying, strictly with their resolution as soon as possible.—
I have the honour to be / With perfect respect / Sir, / Your Obedient and / Humble Servant
Sec
yof the Treas
y
RC (DNA:RG 46, Records of the U.S.
Senate); internal address: “The Honorable / The President of the
Senate”; docketed: “Legis: 1st. Sess: 4th. Cong: / Communication / from the Secy of Treasury and with sundry statements /
January 11th. / 1796.”; notation: “The
statement A. is transfered / to No. 25.
& the other / statements repeated in No.
30. / This is omitted. also its / Statements B & C.”
Wolcott referred to the Senate’s recurring request
for Treasury Department reports on all imports and exports (U.S. Senate, Jour.
, 4th Cong., 1st sess., p.
202).
In the bottom margin, Wolcott added: “See No. 25.— The other statements afterwards sent
to House of Reps. see No. 30.”
In the bottom margin, Wolcott added: “This statement was not transmitted to Congress.”
y.21
st.1796.
I take the liberty of introducing to your acquaintance
the Bearer of this, Mr. Wm: Langworthy, Author of a much approvd Work entitled “an attempt
to promote the Commercical interest of Great Britain,” a Copy of which, I
believe he presented you with1 he is a Gent. of Science and abilities, who
has been invited to this Country, as a proper theatre for the exercise of
his talents and who lately arrived in this City with his family—disgusted
with the scenes in the old world, he seeks tranquility in the new. and
proposes to make our Country the place of his future residence— He was the
intimate friend and Companion of Mr. Cranch2 in England & I believe
is some how related to the family— he is ambitious of paying his respects to
the President, to whom he wishes to present his Book. both yourself &
The President will find him a Gent. of extensive
information, & whose talents may probably be used to great national
advantage, Will you do me the favour of permitting him to accompany you to
the Levee, and presenting him to The President, or if he should be admitted
to a private interview, I think The President will not consider the time
misspent— The Children are all getting well over the measles & Mrs: Smith enjoy’s her usual good health, &
Joins me in sincere wishes for your health & Happiness. I am Dr. Sir. / Your most Obdt. Servt.
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Vice President.”
English author William Langworthy (d. 1798) wrote An Attempt to Promote the Commercial Interests
of Great Britain, Bath, Eng., 1793. A presentation copy bearing
JA’s annotations is at MH-H (
AFC
, 11:152).
John Cranch (1751–1821), Richard’s nephew, resided in
Axminster, England, and frequently sent gifts to the Adamses (
AFC
, 7:379; JA, D&A
, 3:207).
y25. 1796
I do not take the Chronicle, but as it contains the
Answer of the two houses to the Governors speech I thought I would enclose
it to you. Mr Sprague was the Chairman of the
Committee and would have 441 rad it
but [. . .]ing leave of Absence it devolved on Dr Jarvis to read it the Governor made a very submissive short and
extremporaneous reply “that he did mean to be understood to intend to
dictate to The House upon the Subject of The Treaty and that he only spake
in his private Capacity.”1
upon the whole the Governor appears to have lost his Reason his Health and
almost his public Influence. I am Sr with
respect your Humble St
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “The Vice President of The / United States / Philadelphia”; internal address: “The Vice President of the United States”; endorsed: “D [. . . .] / 2 F[. . . .].” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
The enclosure has not been found. In his speech to
the Mass. General Court on 19 Jan., Samuel Adams again voiced his
opposition to the Jay Treaty. He challenged lawmakers to reconsider the
constitutional machinery of treaty-making and ratification. Both houses
concurred with Adams’ sentiments on the Jay Treaty but also maintained
that such diplomatic power should remain vested with the U.S. Congress
and not with the people (
AFC
, 11:144).