Papers of John Adams, volume 21
I inclose you a letter from our friend D’Ivernois
according to his request expressed in it.1 our geographical distance is
insensible still to foreigners. they consider America of the size of a
garden of which Massachusets is one square & Virginia another. I know
not what may have been your sentiments on measures respecting the
transplantation of the science of Geneva to this country. if not more
successful than mine, the mission of their commissaries will make a bad
matter worse. in our state we are already too wise to want instruction
either foreign or domestic: and the worst circumstance is that the more
ignorant we become the less value we set on science, & the less
inclination we shall have to seek it.— we have had a hard winter &
backward spring. this injured our wheat so much that it cannot be made a
good crop. by all the showers of heaven which are now falling down on us
exactly as we want them. our first cutting of clover is not yet begun.
strawberries not ripe till within this fortnight, & every thing backward
in proportion. what with my farming & my nail 401 manufactory I have my hands full. I
am on horseback half the day, & counting & measuring nails the other
half. I am trying potatoes on a large scale as a substitute for Indian corn
for feeding animals. this is new in this country but in this culture we
cannot rival you. present my sincere respects to mr̃s Adams and accept
assurances of the respect & attachment of Dear Sir / Your most obedt / & most humble servt
FC (DLC:Jefferson Papers); internal address: “The Vice President of the US.”
Jefferson enclosed François d’Ivernois’ 21 March
letter (Jefferson, Papers
, 28:310–315).
N: 10.
I received two or three days since your favours of March 26. April 21. and 26. all together, and I know not how to express the pleasure they gave me.1 The first and dearest of all my wishes is personally to give satisfaction and obtain the approbation of my parents, and in a public capacity to justify the confidence placed in me by the appointment I now hold. This wish is in both parts so abundantly gratified by the warm and cordial expressions used in your letters, that I have nothing left to desire, but a continuance of that kindness and indulgence which I have always experienced from you, and which the Government has been pleased to bestow upon my first performances in their service.
Every suggestion or intimation of advice from you, will
always be received with gratitude by me, because I know from long
experience, that it will operate to my own advantage, in its use.— The
Officer I mentioned to you in one of my first Letters, and with respect to
whom you give me a caution, never had any confidence from me. His adventure
here, and his claims and those of his friends for my official services,
embarassed me not a little upon my first arrival: but as I was from the
first moment guarded by my suspicions, I refused all interference in his
affair, beyond what I considered as an obligation of Duty.—2 By doing more, I should have paid
my Court more effectually to the Patriots who
are now at the head of affairs, but I had not forgotten that I was not sent
here, to make myself a partizan of Dutch factions, and I had upon that
occasion at least the advantage of discovering what has since received ample
confirmation; 402 that I
must be content with coolness from the patriotic party, as well as from the
other, and must reconcile myself philosophically to the certainty of being
no favourite with either side.
I have endeavoured in my letters to you hitherto, to
preserve a chain of general intelligence relative to the most important
political affairs of Europe. Since my last Letter, or rather while I was
writing it, a furious insurrection broke out against the Convention, which
was during two days upon the point of a general massacre, and one member of
which was killed by a pistol shot and his head was carried on a pike, in the
Hall of the Convention itself.3 The revolt however was eventually suppressed, and as soon as the victory
of the Assembly was ascertained they appointed a military Commission of five members to try all offenders concerned
in that conspiracy. By this tribunal six members of the Convention have
recently been condemned to Death. All six attempted to anticipate the
execution, by their own hands. three of them succeeded, but the rest
suffered according to the judgment. Three other members of the Convention
prevented even their trial by a voluntary Death. Several others are still
reserved for trial, and in all probability will have the same fate.— All
this proceeds from a deadly aversion to the sanguinary system of terror
pursued in the time of Robespierre. But this singular species of humanity,
this energetic abhorrence of cruelty is not confined within the limits of
legal forms; in many of the departments the former murderers are murdered
with as little ceremony: the drowners are drowned. The mere name of
terrorist is a title to proscription, and how often the name is given by private malice for the sake of
producing the proscription, is not told. These excesses are disapproved by
all the sober part of the Nation; they are disapproved even by the
Convention; but they are committed every day and there is no power competent
to restrain or to punish them.— On the other hand, the War in the Vendee
again blazes out with extreme violence as is said. A sort of treaty had been
signed by the deputies of the Convention on the one side, and the principal
leaders of the rebellion on the other. The latter were promised pardon and
protection, engaging to submit to the laws of the Republic. It is now said
they were perfidiously dissimulating; that they have violated the
pacification, twenty-five or thirty of them have been arrested and sent to
Paris for trial; and the Convention has decreed that the violation of the
Treaty is an offence punishable with Death.4
At Toulon a Jacobin insurrection, was for some time successful. It 403 extended to the fleet then in the harbour and prevented it from sailing to meet the British fleet in the mediterranean. a member of the Convention in mission there, was driven to despair by this Event, and shot himself. But this revolt was of short duration; order was soon restored, and the fleet has now sailed.5
The Son of Louis the 16th:
died in the Temple on the 8th: of this month.
His Sister the only remaining child of the late king, it is said is very
ill. The surgeon who attended the boy in his illness, died a few days before
him. a procés verbal, signed by four health officers, by order of the
Committee of general surety declares that the Death was owing to a
scrophulous disease of long continuance.6
In the midst of all these Events, the arms of the Republic continue to be victorious. Luxemburg not long since capitulated, and a garrison of twelve thousand men, returns to Germany engaging not to serve against the french or their allies during the war. Mentz alone now remains to be taken on the left side of the Rhine. A Peace between France and the German Empire becomes probable. But the Emperor and Great Britain, or at least the latter will remain at War.
The Perseverance of the british Government is founded
upon their confidence in their naval superiority, which is now established
more decisively than it has ever been. The french Government to make a
parade of commanding the Seas, sent their large fleet of 36. Men of War to
cruize to and fro in the channel through the months of December and January
last. They enjoyed the satisfaction of naval empire at their full leisure.
It was not for a moment disputed; and indeed scarcely perceived, in a season
when Commerce is not fond of frequenting the channel. The price at which
this enjoyment was purchased, was the total loss of seven ships of the line,
wrecked in a tempest, and all the fleet so shattered and disabled, that it
has not yet been repaired, and will be able to do nothing this Season. It is
possible that one effort more will be made in the Mediterranean; but the
reasonable french men begin to give up even the pretention of contesting the
Sea, during the present war. They did expect that their success in this
Country would have proved essentially advantageous to them; and upon their
first arrival here; you would have imagined they were landing upon the
English Coast. They soon discovered their error. The naval force of this
Country was “magni nominis umbra,” and if the french did not take possession
of all they found in the ports of this Republic, by right of Conquest, it was merely because all they found
was really not worth taking. The 404
Batavians have stipulated in their Treaty of alliance to have twelve ships
of the line and six eighteen frigates
during this Season, ready for sea. They will probably not have half the
number. At this moment there does not appear to be a single frigate or Man
of War fit for sea, and the british come and take prizes in full sight of
the Texel itself.
On the strength of their maritime supremacy the british Government have revived their system of famishing their enemies into submission: and as they were unable to protect the Hollanders as friends they have concluded to starve them too. All neutral vessels laden with provisions bound to France or Holland, are to be captured by the british armed vessels, and carried into their ports: the freights and cargoes are to be paid.
The policy of the british Government seems to consider military operations as the least essential part of War. The pride, pomp and circumstance of their hostility consist, not in the neighing steed, the shrill trump, the spirit-stirring drum, the ear-piercing fife, or the royal banner, but in forgery and famine. Their troops have been the terror of their friends and the derision of their enemies; but their artists are inimitable at counterfeiting an assignat, and their frigates and privateers are invincible against the merchant vessels of neutral Nations. Trahit sua quemque voluptas: every man has his predilection for some particular species of glory.7 That of conquering by famine and forgery may have its charms too, and however destructive such a contest may be, the victory would at least have the advantage of being bloodless.
It is however at this time tolerably well ascertained that the system of starving will not be more successful this time, than it has been heretofore. The scarcity of bread is undoubtedly great in France and in this Country too, but every other article of provision is in usual plenty, the Season is said to be uncommonly promising; a considerable variety of vegetables which can serve to supply the place of bread have already reached their maturity even in this northern climate, and every day from the present moment will add some new article to the stores. The usual period of the harvest is rapidly approaching, and the british Government, will once more be obliged to console themselves for the failure of their design, by the consciousness of its efficacy. The mere intention to famish thirty millions of the human race is an effort that must carry its own reward along with it, and even its failure will be not much less glorious than would be its success.
Since the Conclusion of the Treaty between the french and
405 Batavian Republics nothing very
material has taken place here. The same languor and imbecility which
characterized the former government is equally discovered by the present. No
vigour, no exertions, no public spirit, but abundance of common place about
liberty, equality and the rights of man; abundance of invective against the
house of Orange and its partizans; abundance of patriotic exultation
together with frequent ebullitions of rage restrained, and of revenge
repressed but ready to burst forth in all its violence against the rotten part of the Nation, the slavish
subalterns of their oppressors, that is against all the members of the
former regencies. This spirit of turbulence is preserved and stimulated by
the popular societies, as numerous and almost as mischievous here as they
are elsewhere. The other day at Rotterdam, in consequence of some flaming
resolves of the popular Society there, a mob of several thousand people
assembled together; went to the State House, and demanded of the
municipality to order all the members of the
former Regency immediately under arrest: the municipality remonstrated,
stating that the people were not legally assembled, that their demand was
contrary to the rights of Man, inasmuch as they had made no specific charge
against the persons whose arrest they desired. To this grave and serious
objection the only reply to the municipality was that if they had any regard
for their own lives they must instantly comply with the wishes of the
people, and they complied accordingly. The mob then chose a committee to
come and demand of the Provincial assembly the same measure of severity to
be extended throughout the Province. The assembly entered into a sort of
negotiation with them; annulled the order that had been extorted from the
municipality of Rotterdam; discharged the persons confined under it from
their arrest, excepting only the former high officer, whose arrest is
continued because the people of Rotterdam appear to
be very much irritated against him: and promise that they will pay
all proper attention to the wishes of the people. The collection of well-disposed People (the name assumed by the
irregular assembly) are not satisfied with these measures, their secretary
makes a formal protestation against it
them, and publishes it in the news papers. The members of the municipality
at Rotterdam, indignant at the violence to which they had been forced to
yield, all resign, and afterwards at the request of the provincial Assembly
consent to continue in office for the present.8
The Character; the situation, and temper of the
Provincial Assembly of the municipalities in general, of the popular
Societies, and of 406 the
peuple patriote are all displayed more
clearly in this one transaction, than could be done by a volume of
description or argumentation. In the rulers you see moderation, a regard for
good principles, and a sense of the duties annexed to their stations; but
all subordinate to complaisance for the popular will, and still more to
personal fear. In the popular Societies and their emanations the thirst for
party vengeance, the want of confidence in the nominal rulers so lately the
objects of their own choice, the contempt of all principles upon which
political and civil liberty must be founded, and the defiance publicly
proclaimed of all the authorities which have so recently been created, are
equally discernible. I have related this anecdote therefore as a specimen
from which it may be judged what the present state of affairs here is. Many
others might be told bearing in a degree the same distinctive marks, and all
would tend to the confirmation of the same conclusion. In the meantime the
project of making a new Constitution is yet held forth, and the States
General have lately sent to the Provincial Assemblies for their acceptance a
plan for the convocation of a National Convention. This plan is considered
as a thing of so little consequence, that it has not even been published in
any of the french news papers of the Country. I have therefore made a
translation of it from the Dutch for the Secretary of State, and send a copy
of it also to you, because it is really an object of curiosity; and because,
I am glad to have an opportunity of shewing you, that I have not entirely
neglected the language.9
I shall perhaps take another opportunity to communicate the observations which this plan suggests, in relation to the state of the public opinion upon the theory of Government; but at present I must remember that I am writing a Letter and not a volume.
I have at length received instructions which relieve me
from all embarassment with respect to the conduct I have to hold in the
changes which have been and yet will be taking place around me.10 Hitherto I have had no occasion to
take any step that could occasion cause
particular remark, and if I have not made myself violent friends and
admirers in the party, by subscribing to their clubs, and joining in their
processions, neither have I made myself obnoxious by any conduct or remarks
that could be offensive to them. The other neutral Ministers, and even the
Portugueze11 have
constantly remained here: I have found them all very polite, obliging and
friendly.
I have the same acknowledgment to make with respect to the 407 french Representatives and Generals who have been in this Country. It is due to them all excepting Sieyes who in the only conversation I had with him spoke of the Government of the United States, in a manner different from the others, and who was answered by me in a manner equally different from that I had used with the rest. I have related the conversation in a letter to the Secretary of State.12
I am with every Sentiment of duty and affection, Dear Sir, your / ever obliged and grateful Son
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Vice-President.”;
endorsed by JA: “N. 10. / J Q. Adams / Hague”; and by
AA: “July 27 1795”; docketed by AA:
“JQA / July 27th 1795.”
LbC (Adams
Papers); APM Reel
128. Tr (Adams
Papers).
In his 26 March letter to JQA,
JA wrote that he had forwarded JQA’s 9 Nov. 1794 letter to Edmund
Randolph to deliver to George Washington and that the Jay Treaty had
arrived in the United States. JA had not yet read the
treaty, but he forecasted that the Senate would ratify it in a special
session that summer. JA wrote next on 21 April 1795,
commenting on the French invasion of Holland and projecting that the
French Army and civil authorities in Holland would treat
JQA well. In his 26 April missive, JA
complimented JQA’s reports on European affairs as “clear,
comprehensive, & masterly Accounts” (
AFC
, 10:400–402, 414–415,
422–424).
Dutch government officials arrested French Army major
general John Skey Eustace (1760–1805), of New York, William and Mary
1776, on suspicion of criminal activity and seized his private papers.
In his 17 Nov. letter to JA (Adams Papers), JQA wrote that
he reluctantly assisted Eustace because despite his foreign military
service Eustace was an American citizen and thus “entitled to every
proper exertion on my part, for securing to him the privileges of our
neutrality.” That same day, JQA went to the house where
Eustace was imprisoned, but the general had been released. Replying on
26 March 1795, JA cautioned JQA that he had
“particular Reasons for hinting, that, by what I have heard of his
Conduct in America during & after the late War, although he is a
Stranger to me, your Confidence Should be reserved with discretion.”
Eustace left the Netherlands and traveled to Paris, but in 1797 he was
expelled from France and ultimately returned to the United States (
AFC
, 10:401, 402;
JQA, Writings
, 1:230, 266).
Of 22 May 1795, above. Two days earlier, a crowd swarmed the
Paris hall where the National Convention met, shouting for bread and the
restoration of the Constitution of 1793. They threatened François
Antoine, Comte de Boissy d’Anglas (1756–1826), the chair of the
Convention. They killed a deputy, Jean Bertrand Féraud, and speared his
head on a pike. It took three days for 20,000 troops to quell the riot
(
Cambridge Modern Hist.
, 8:388, 389; Paul R. Hanson,
Historical Dictionary of the French
Revolution, Lanham, Md., 2007, p. 260;
AFC
, 11:12).
For the origins of the civil war in La Vendée, see
John Brown
Cutting’s 29 July 1794 letter, and note 3, above. Since the
Vendéens had not disarmed, the possibility that they could again rebel
against the government in Paris fueled rumors that an uprising was
afoot. However, both sides accepted peace terms in May 1795 (
Cambridge Modern Hist.
, 8:381–382, 391).
Largely stoked by unemployed dock workers, a Jacobin
rebellion broke out in Toulon on 17 May that took the French government
two weeks to suppress (
Cambridge Modern Hist.
,
8:387).
With the death of ten-year-old Louis XVII, French
royalists hoping for a Bourbon restoration shifted their allegiance to
Louis Stanislaus Xavier, Comte de Provence, brother of Louis XVI and the
future Louis XVIII. Marie Thérèse Charlotte (1778–1851), known as
“Madame Royale,” was the eldest child of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.
She was freed in 1795 when the Austrian Army exchanged her for French
prisoners (Bosher, French Rev.
, p. xxi, 237;
AFC
, 3:142, 11:313).
Virgil, Eclogues, Book
2, line 65.
On 14 June a Rotterdam mob marched to the Stadhuis
and demanded the arrest of all public officials who had served from 1787
to 1795, including sheriff Jan Hendrik van Staveren. Rotterdam
councilors imprisoned the officials but also informed the National
Assembly at The Hague, which in turn successfully ordered the release of
all save Van Staveren. One week later, the National Assembly at The
Hague named journalist Gerrit Paape, who likely published the protest in
his newspaper, ’s Hertogenbossche Vaderlandsche
Courant, to investigate past administrators’ financial dealings
(Schama, Patriots and Liberators
, p. 185,
227–228, 741).
The enclosure has not been found, but
JQA also enclosed a copy in his 25 June letter to
Randolph (DNA:RG 59, Despatches from United States
Ministers to the Netherlands, 1794–1906, Microfilm, Reel 1, f. 199–217).
The 29 May plan for the creation of a Batavian National Convention
outlined a complex scheme for elections and recommended the retention of
both the States General and the new provincial assemblies pending the
adoption of a new constitution (Schama, Patriots and
Liberators
, p. 237).
Randolph wrote to JQA on 27 Feb.,
instructing him to judge which Dutch political faction was sufficiently
established as the de facto and de jure government representing the
Dutch people. He also ordered JQA to present his diplomatic
credentials to that bloc (JQA, Writings
, 1:379).
Antonio de Araujo de Azevedo (1754–1817) served as
Portuguese minister to the Netherlands from 1790 to 1802 (
AFC
, 11:264).
In his 14 May 1795 report to Randolph,
JQA wrote that French diplomats Jean François Rewbell
and the Abbé Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès had arrived at The Hague to
negotiate a French treaty with the Netherlands, for which see JQA’s 22 May
letter, and note 2, above. To the secretary of state,
JQA recollected a private conversation with Sieyès, in
which he explained that the terms of the travel-delayed Jay Treaty must
remain secret until it won the Senate’s approval (JQA, Writings
, 1:344–348;
AFC
, 10:433).