Papers of John Adams, volume 21

Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 6 February 1795 Jefferson, Thomas Adams, John
From Thomas Jefferson
Dear Sir Monticello Feb. 6. 1795.

The time which has intervened between the receipt of your favor, covering D’Ivernois’ letter, and this answer, needs apology. but this will be found in the state of the case. I had received from him a letter similar to that you inclosed.1 as the adoption of his plan depended on our legislature, and it was then in session, I immediately inclosed it to a member with a request that he would sound well the opinions of the leading members, and if he found them disposed to enter into D’Ivernois’ views, to make the proposition; but otherwise not to hazard it. it is only three days since I have received from him information of his proceedings. he found it could not prevail. the unprepared state of our youths to receive instruction thro’ a foreign language, the expence of the institution, and it’s disproportion to the moderate state of our population, were insuperable objections. I delayed myself the honor of acknoleging the receipt of your letter, till I might be able to give you at the same time the result of the proposition it forwarded. I have explained this to M. D’Ivernois in the inclosed letter, which my distance from any sea-port, & the convenience of your position will I hope excuse my committing to your care.—2 I have found so much tranquility of mind in a total abstraction from every thing political, that it was with some difficulty I could resolve to meddle even in the splendid project of transplanting the academy of Geneva, en masse, to Virginia; and I did it under the usual reserve of sans tirer en consequence. in truth I have so much occupation otherwise that I have not time for taking a part in any thing of a public kind, & I threfore leave such with pleasure to those who are to live longer & enjoy their benefits. tranquility becomes 369 daily more & more the object of my life; and of this I certainly find more in my present pursuits than in those of any other part of my life. I recall however with pleasure the memory of some of the acquaintances I have made in my progress through it, and retain strong wishes for their happiness. I pray you to accept with kindness those which I sincerely entertain for you, & to be assured of the high respect & esteem with which I am Dear sir / Your most obedt. / & most humble sert

Th: Jefferson

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Vice President.”; endorsed: “Mr Jefferson. Feb. 6. 1795”; docketed by JQA: “T. Jefferson 5. Feby: 1795.”; notation by CFA: “not published.” CFA presumably meant that the letter was not published in Jefferson, Correspondence, ed. Randolph.

1.

Jefferson referred to JA’s letter of 21 Nov. 1794, above, and a missive of 11 Nov. from François d’Ivernois, for which see Jefferson, Papers , 28:189–196.

2.

Jefferson enclosed his 6 Feb. 1795 letter to d’Ivernois (Jefferson, Papers , 28:262–264).

John Trumbull to John Adams, 6 February 1795 Trumbull, John Adams, John
From John Trumbull
Sir Hartford Feby. 6th: 1795

I received yours of the 24th. of Jany. with the enclosures, & esteem myself honored by your confidence.

The general idea among us relative to the treaty with Great Britain has been, that Dr: Franklin scarcely extended his ideas beyond the hopes of a long truce, guaranteed by our Allies, without the acknowlegement of our Independence, or a settlement of the line of our Inland boundaries.— That Mr: Jay, tho’ opposed to this opinion, could hardly hold the Doctor at bay— That your arrival changed the scene, & that all the merit of the Treaty, & all the advantages we obtained were to be ascribed only to You & Mr. Jay— But as he appeared first to act in opposition to Franklin, perhaps he may have received on that account, a greater share of praise. Your communications explain the whole, & You may depend on my keeping secret that part of your letter marked with crotchetts.

The President’s speech, I perceive has roused the Democratic Societies in every part of the Union. What effect their addresses may have elsewhere, I know not— We consider them in the nature of dying speeches & confessions. Willcox of New York writes that the President has given them a Resurrection— I hope it will not prove a Resurrection unto life. 1

The Bone for the Democrats was sent us on its first publication.2 Though evidently written in haste, & in some parts in a style of levity 370 & vulgarity, it contains many passages of keen satire & highwrought humour, that would not have disgraced the pen of a Swift or a Cervantes. I will hazard no conjecture concerning the Writer or Writers, though many strokes exactly resemble the manner of some of our Connecticut Gentlemen, now at Philadelphia— One advantage we have certainly gained from the President’s speech—that the opposers of the Democratical Societies now dare to attack them openly with the utmost severity of censure.

It seems that the high salaries, which occasioned so much clamour, cannot retain your chief Executive Officers in their places. I am sorry that Hamilton resigns—for tho’ I believe my friend Wolcott can fully supply his place, I fear you cannot find an equal second for that department.

It is a happy circumstance that our Government is completely organized—that the Funds, the Bank, the Duties &c are too firmly established to be overturned by a Democratic Majority in the House of Representatives. If the existence of the Government depended on a Vote of that House, it could only be obtained from the fears, not the goodwill, of the present Members. But as the Machine is so nearly perfected, they cannot wholly stop its progress, tho’ they may occasionally craze its chariot-wheels. The long debates in Congress about matters of the most trivial importance, & the petulance, passion & party-spirit constantly displayed, degrade them in the eyes of the People. No good can be done in the present session, & I believe no capital mischief—and this is the utmost of my expectation.

My health is yet very indifferent, and the cold season has almost wholly confined me. I fear I shall never be capable of much farther service, unless, as Atterbury says, in angulo cum libello.3 With the most affectionate Respect, I am Yr. most Obedt. Servt.

John Trumbull

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Vice President.”; endorsed: “Mr Trumbull Feb. 6. / ansd 13. 1795.”

1.

By mid-1793, a number of citizens’ groups, including the highly influential Democratic Society of Pennsylvania, were created in support of the French cause. These democratic societies circulated letters, spread war news, and incited revolutionary sentiment. In his 19 Nov. 1794 message to Congress, George Washington singled out these nascent Democratic-Republican groups as the “self-created societies” that bred the Whiskey Rebellion and posed harm to the nation’s political future. New York lawyer William Wilcocks (d. 1826) frequently published on the same subject in the New York Daily Advertiser ( AFC , 10:276, 277, 282; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 3:406–407, 14:42, 17:181–182; Robert W. T. Martin, Government by Dissent: Protest, Resistance, and Radical Democratic Thought in the Early American Republic, N.Y., 2013, p. 222).

2.

Writing under the pseudonym Peter Porcupine, William Cobbett published his attack on Democratic-Republican ideology as A Bone 371 to Gnaw, for the Democrats; or, Observations on a Pamphlet, Entitled, “The Political Progress of Britain,” Part I, Phila., 1795, Evans, No. 28431 ( AFC , 10:352).

3.

Anglican bishop Francis Atterbury (1662–1732) used this phrase, “in a little nook with a little book,” in his published correspondence to describe his scholarly pursuits ( DNB ; Robert Folkestone Williams, Memoirs and Correspondence of Francis Atterbury, D.D., Bishop of Rochester, 2 vols., London, 1869, 1:370).