Papers of John Adams, volume 21
22 November 1794
We receive with pleasure your speech to the two Houses of Congress.1 In it we perceive renewed proofs of that vigilant and paternal concern for the prosperity, honor, and happiness of our country, which has uniformly distinguished your past administration.
Our anxiety arising from the licentious and open resistance to the laws in the western counties of Pennsylvania, has been increased by the proceedings of certain self-created societies, relative to the laws and administration of the government—proceedings, in our apprehension, founded in political error, calculated, if not intended, to disorganize our Government; and which, by inspiring delusive hopes of support, have been influential in misleading our fellow-citizens in the scene of insurrection.
In a situation so delicate and important, the lenient and persuasive measures which you adopted, merit and receive our affectionate approbation. These failing to procure their proper effect, and coercion having become inevitable, we have derived the highest satisfaction from the enlightened patriotism and animating zeal with which the citizens of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia, have rallied around the standard of Government, in opposition to anarchy and insurrection.
Our warm and cordial acknowledgments are due to you, sir, for the wisdom and decision with which you arrayed the militia to execute the public will; and to them, for the disinterestedness and alacrity with which they obeyed your summons.2
The example is precious to the theory of our Government, and confers the brightest honor upon the patriots who have given it.
We shall readily concur in such farther provisions for the security of internal peace and a due obedience to the laws, as the occasion manifestly requires.
The effectual organization of the militia, and a prudent attention to the fortifications of our ports and harbors, are subjects of great national importance, and, together with the other measures you have been pleased to recommend, will receive our deliberate consideration.
The success of the troops under the command of General Wayne, cannot fail to produce essential advantages. The pleasure with which we acknowledge the merits of that gallant general and army, is 337 enhanced by the hope that their victories will lay the foundation of a just and durable peace with the Indian tribes.3
At a period so momentous in the affairs of nations, the temperate, just, and firm policy that you have pursued, in respect to foreign Powers, has been eminently calculated to promote the great and essential interest of our country, and has created the fairest title to the public gratitude and thanks.
Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
MS not found. Printed from
Amer.
State Papers
, Foreign
Relations, 1:26.
Washington used most of his 19 Nov. message to
Congress to address the Whiskey Rebellion, for which see note 2, below.
He noted that the crisis revealed the need for Congress to regulate the
national militia and recommended establishing western trading posts to
improve U.S.-Native American relations. Speaker Frederick Augustus
Muhlenberg delivered the House of Representatives’ reply on 29 Nov.,
lauding Washington’s handling of the rebellion and lamenting “so painful
an occurrence in the annals of our country” (Washington, Papers,
Presidential Series
, 17:181–190; U.S. House, Jour.
, 3d Cong., 2d sess., p.
247; Madison, Papers, Congressional Series
,
15:386–388).
Combining various state militias, the president led
an army of nearly 13,000 to quell the Whiskey Rebellion. By 8 Nov.
JA reported that there was “All Submission, in the
Whiskey Counties. But a Force will be kept there to ensure their
Obedience for some necessary time.” Several insurgents were arrested and
tried for treason. Two men were convicted, but Washington later pardoned
them. JA viewed the conflict as an example of the United
States’ potential military might, reflecting, “An Army of 15,000 militia
so easily raised from 4 states only to go upon such an Enterprize, ought
to be a terrible Phænomenon to antifœderal Citizens as well as to
insolent Britains” (vol. 20:xxxii;
AFC
, 10:248, 271;
Slaughter, Whiskey Rebellion
, p. 212,
219–220).
Following the defeat of Gen. Arthur St. Clair to a
confederated force of Native fighters at the Battle of the Wabash on 4
Nov. 1791 in the Northwest Territory, Secretary of War Henry Knox and
Washington created the Legion of the United States. It was a flexible
organization composed of four sub-legions of 1,200 men each, which
combined cavalry and artillery with infantry. Washington appointed Gen.
Anthony Wayne as commander in April 1792. Wayne trained his troops while
waiting for the outcome of negotiations between the American
commissioners and Native peoples in Ohio, for which see Benjamin Lincoln’s 11
Sept. 1793 letter, and note 2, above. When the talks
foundered, Wayne went on the offensive, culminating in his victory at
the Battle of Fallen Timbers on 20 Aug. 1794. The British commander at
Fort Miami refused entry to the Native soldiers fleeing the battlefield,
and offered no resistance when Wayne burned the surrounding villages and
crops (Kohn, Eagle and Sword
, p. 115, 124,
125, 126, 143, 156–157).
I wrote you a few Lines last Week—1 This Morning I was favored with
two Letters from your Son of the 14 & 20th.
of this Month—2 Parents are
gratified by hearing of or from their children— the former Letter was Dated
at The Hague—the latter at amsterdam— He had been recd. and acknowledged by the States General, and on the 14th had “a gracious audience of the
Stadtholder.”—3 In his
last Letter there is this Paragraph— “It is here said that on the Meeting of
338 Parliamt.
the King of Great Britain is to mention in the Speech from the Throne, the
Signature of a Convention for the Settlemt. of
The Differences with america. This Intelligence is extremely grateful to the
Merchants engaged in the american Commerce here, who are anxiously
sollicitous for the Event of your Negociation; and whose Curiosity is
proportionable to their anxiety”— Before your Son left us I submitted to his
Consideration the Draft of the Treaty, as it then stood—4
with real Esteem and Regard I am / Dear Sir / Your Friend
& Servt
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency / John Adams
Esqr.—”
Of 21 Nov., above.
JQA wrote to Jay on 14 Nov. to recommend
Rodolph Vall-Travers, who carried JQA’s official
dispatches. He reported on the French Army’s continued success in the
Netherlands and added that the news of the Whiskey Rebellion was
damaging U.S. credit in Europe. No 20 Nov. letter has been found, but
JQA wrote next on 21 Nov., informing Jay that he had
found another method to send his dispatches and that Dutch merchants
favored the Jay Treaty’s terms (Jay, Selected
Papers
, 6:204–205, 240–241).
JQA presented his credentials to William V, Prince of Orange and Stadholder of the Netherlands, at The Hague on 14 Nov. (D/JQA/22, APM Reel 25). Writing to JA on 17 Nov., JQA reported that William V “enquired after you, mentioned the time of your arrival here and that of your acknowledgment and reception asked me if I was not here with you, and whether I did not study at Leyden” (Adams Papers).
When Parliament opened on 30 Dec., George III
announced his “great pleasure” at negotiating an Anglo-American treaty
intended to end “all grounds of jealousy and misunderstanding, and to
improve an intercourse beneficial to both countries.” He told Parliament
that once ratifications were exchanged, M.P.’s could determine how to
implement the new agreement. British newspapers reported closely on
those next steps, which stretched into Jan. 1796, but the European war
dominated public attention. JQA agreed with Jay that the
treaty was flawed but found it to be “preferable to a War” (London Courier, 31 Dec. 1794; London Whitehall Evening Post, 28–30 Jan. 1796;
London Oracle, 30 Jan.; Jay, Selected Papers
, 6:245;
D/JQA/22, 22 Oct. 1794, APM Reel 25).