Papers of John Adams, volume 21
1794]
I hope not, that your Excellencÿ will find me troublesome; that I soo often intrude myself upon you— It is Some more Leisure, this winter, occasioned by mÿ intendeth departure to the Western Parts, which I can Spent with my Librarÿ and which affords me if not an opportunity, at least an excuse, for adressing a few Lines to your Excellency.
However it would be pardonable, if I did judge, bÿ the continued esteem, and honourable distinction, with which I was favour’d, not to want it; when the common calamities of mankind, plunged in the horrors of universal confusion, the cruel dissentions and bloody massacres in France, with the follÿ of 25 Millions to deprive themselves of the happiest opportunity, of preserving their Rights and Liberties, and ensurig all the Rational blessings of a wel constituted government, wich never will return—exhorted me to Sent up a few Lines.
Genet’s Rapport of the Pretended victories was, as I expected, fabricated by him, and divulgued with eagerness by those, who rejoiced in what woud ruin them, with their familÿs—2
Brissot with Some of his Partÿ sufferd the fate of their Royal master, and though manÿ of them had merited their Share, nevertheless the inflicted punishment, it seems, had been iniquitous in everÿ aspect—3 A larger number maÿ follow them Soon.
If the best part of the French people with Some of the convention can not unite, to overthrow that Set of Ruffians, who are at the helm, and make Such Provisional arrangements, sufficient to bring to their Standard—all those, who have virtue and property, either it be an Democrat, Aristocrat or Roÿalist, Sufficient to appease the combined Powers and remove their armies from the French territorÿ— then Paris will be utterly destroy’d before the termination of war can be expected— yea, this perhaps may be the case, ’though the combined Powers were obliged to become Suitors for Peace.
Your Excellency will remember, that two years ago it was something Surprising, that the French Lawgivers did not consider more Seriously the Constitution of the British government, and make it a point of their deliberations, if that Constitution could not be amended, adapted to their peculiar Situation, and carried to the highest pitch of perfection, that they did not chuse to make use of the adsistance, 254 which your Excellency had prepared for them, in translating your Defence of our Constitutions, which, at least, would have enabled a number of the Convention, who for the first time in their Live managed Politics—measuring them in the Large Scale of the rights of mankind without appealing to antient or modern Records of Nations, to judge on the fitnes or unfitness of Such a plan, and balance the blessings and curses of other Political combinations, which other States enjoy’d or Suffer’d—
I know not, if you Excellency can Spar time enough, to consult the french Productions—during the Revolution—and in this uncertainty, I will communicate to you, what I found—not long ago, in one of them—which will afford an Striking argument, that by the Leading characters, it was not so much, want of information as well want of good will, and an propensity for dominion, which allured them to Shut their understanding for conviction—
De Calonne, whose abilities and talents are above dispute, ’though his moral character may be equivocal, and in this point he resembles a large number of the National Convention, allumed this flambeau for his Countrymen—
In one of his Publications, worthÿ your Perusal, he Says— “L’essence d’une Monarchie Libre—celle, ou Le Pouvoir du Monarque, est temperé par L’existence d’un corps Legislatif.—que Le Pouvoir de ce Corps soit lui meme temperé par celui du Monarque et qu’il y ait entre les deux un troisieme Pouvoir moderateur de L’un et L’autre qui Puisse empecher leur invasions reciproques.[”] (a)
Calonne Lettre au Roÿ du 9 Febr. 1789 ed. in 4to.
cahier de La noblesse du Metz—p. 10
—de Montargis art. i
Mr. Le Comte D’Entragues—
(a) Pour s’en convaincre, il faudroit Lire l’excellent
ouvrage de Mr. Adams, intitulé, defence de la
Constitution du gouvernment des Etats-Unis de L’amerique 2 vol. in
8vo. impr. a Londres. “j’en ai donné La Subsistance dans ma Lettre au Roi de
89 aux p. 30–32.
Calonne. de L’État de La
France
Londr. Oct. 1790. P. 162. 165.[”]4
Accept this communication as an apologÿ for my Letter, and permit me, to remember your Excelencÿ, that I dear Strife with your eldest, and most attached friends, in regard of the high esteem and consideration, which with / I am / Sir! / Your Excellency’s Most ob. and / humble Servant
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Vanderkemp / Feb. 3. 1794. / ansd 18.”
An inadvertence. The redating of this letter is based on JA’s 18 Feb. reply, below. Van der Kemp wrote on 1 Feb., denouncing Edmond Charles Genet’s activities and suggesting that the United States serve as a mediator in ending the European war (Adams Papers).
Genet spread a partially correct account of
developments in the European war, which appeared, for example, in the
Boston American Apollo, 23 January. He
wildly overestimated French victories, claiming that the army had seized
Prince Frederick Augustus, Duke of York and Albany, vanquished British
forces, and successfully recaptured Toulon. Congress adjourned an hour
early on 14 Jan. “owing to the sensation” caused by Genet’s account
(
AFC
, 10:53).
French revolutionary leader Jacques Pierre Brissot de
Warville was guillotined on 31 Oct. 1793 (
AFC
, 10:53).
Charles Alexandre de Calonne, De l’état de la France: présent et à venir, London, 1790.
r.5
th.1794
The paper you was pleased to communicate to the American
Academy, from Mr. Taylor, describing a new
species of wheat, was received with much pleasure.1 From his account of its ripening
so much earlier than the common wheat, it appears highly probable it might
be raised in this part of the country, where, at present, we raise no wheat
at all. If it would succeed, it must, undoubtedly, prove a great acquisition
to us. A number of Gentlemen of the Academy, in different parts of the
Commenwealth, wish to make the experiment, but the difficulty is to obtain
the seed. We much regret that Mr. Taylor did not
mention where it might be purchased in Virginia, with certainty of its being
of the right kind. If he would be so obliging as to inform us where it may
be bought, or how we may obtain at least, a small quantity, it would be
considerd as a particular favour. Or, if he could, without inconvenience to
himself, request some person in Virginia to ship a few bushels for Boston,
addressed to Doctr. Aaron Dexter, it would be
considered as a still greater favour; and the Doctr. will instantly pay every expence that may attend the purchase
& conveyance to him. I should be much gratified by obtaing only half a
dozen kernels, which might be conveniently enclosed in a letter, as I feel
anxious to make the experiment.
Mr. Taylor has not told us
from whence the wheat came, from which the man purchased his seed containing
the single kernel of this kind of wheat. Was it imported seed? or was it
raised in some other part of the Continent?— Nor has he informed us whether
it be winter or spring grain, nor in what month it was sown in Virginia. It
would be a satisfaction to know the months & days in the months 256 on which it has been sown, as it
might afford some direction to us in making the experiment.
I have presumed to trouble you, Sir, with this letter,
& to solicit the favour of your mentioning the matter to Mr. Taylor, at the particular request of Dr. Dexter, Col Baldin, Mr. Davis of Plymouth,2 & some other Members of the
Academy, who are very desirous, as well as my self, to make the experiment.
Beg you to excuse the liberty I have taken, & permit me to subscribe
myself / with sentiments of the highest / respect— / Sir, / Your most
obedient / humble servt
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Honble. John Adams Esquire.”
For Manasseh Cutler, a botanist and clergyman, see vol. 19:326. On 1 Jan. JA forwarded to Joseph Willard, the corresponding secretary of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a letter, not found, first sent by Virginia senator John Taylor. JA wrote that the document contained “information which may become useful to the Agriculture of the Northern Parts of America” (MBA:General records, Unbound correspondence, 1781–1936).
Aaron Dexter (1750–1829), Harvard 1776, was a
chemistry professor at Harvard Medical School. Col. Loammi Baldwin
(1745–1807), of Woburn, Mass., was a surveyor and engineer. Jurist John
Davis (1761–1847), of Plymouth, Mass., Harvard 1781, rounded out the
trio (
AFC
, 4:138; Washington, Papers,
Revolutionary War Series
, 1:185, 188; JA, Legal Papers
, 3:40).