Papers of John Adams, volume 21
The Secy of the Treasury is
so able and has done So well that I have Scarcely permitted myself to think
very closely whether he could or could not have done better. I may venture
however to Say to you, that I have always been of your Opinion, that a
System a little bolder would have been more Safe: and that it would have
been better to have begun at once with a Small direct Tax, a pretty liberal
Stamp Tax, and an Excise, as well as an impost on Merchandize and
Tonnage.
This day has brought me a masterly review of Burke, and I have been so well pleased with it as to use a freedom with it, which I hope you will excuse. I think almost exactly with you of the French Revolution. Absolute Monarchy appears to me to be dead, without a possibility of a resurrection in France. A Counter Revolution is impracticable. Yet their present Constitution cannot be durable. A Convention or a civil War, or both, must make some more judicious Provision, for repressing human Passions than has yet been adopted. 24 They must descend more deeply into the Abysses of the human heart and consider the Origin, Progress and Tendency of the Passions, and erect more permanent Barriers against them.
They will find the Judgment of Socrates, as infallible as
an oracle, when he Says to Clinias the Cretan and Magillus the Lacedemonian.
Veree, enim, O Viri optimi, Reipublicæ participes estis; quæ autem modo
nominatæ Sunt, Aristocratia, Democratia et Monarchia, non Respublicæ, Sed
Urbium habitationes quædam Sunt, in quibus pars una
Servit alteri dominanti. Platos Laws. Lib. 3. and in his 8th— Book Nulla Certe potestas hujus modi,
Respublica est, Sed Seditiones omnes Appellari rectissime possunt. Nulla
enim volentibus volens, Sed volens nolentibus Semper Vi aliqua
dominatur.1 Human
Passions domineer in each of the three Simple Governments. to enquire which
of them is the best is only to enquire, which will produce most mischief,
the Passions of one Man the Passions of the Majority of a Senate or the
Passions of a Majority of the Multitude. to enquire whether a mixed
Government is better than a Simple one, is to ask whether the Passions are
as wise as just and as moderate as the Laws. If these opinions are unerring
oracles as I really believe them, a melancholly Consequence must be drawn
from them, vizt that there has Scarcely ever been a Government upon Earth,
but what was a sedition. Some have been less gross than others however.
I thank you sir for your friendly Communications respecting myself. It was News to me. I have Said little concerning myself, and am determined to Say still less. To You however I will be so free in Confidence as to say, that as it has appeared to be the desire both of North and south to annihilate me and my office, I have acquiesced, not indeed without some little Wonder at the Policy at least of the North.— If as you think, my Spirit, is not agreable to Some Gentlemen, I Shall not however humiliate much less debase that Spirit, in complaisance to those Gentlemen. If as you say my Morals are not agreable, I am at a Loss to know whether those morals are too good or too bad. If they are too good I shall not make them worse, in Complaisance to those Gentlemen. Heaven knows I wish them better as much as any of them. If as you Suppose my manners are not agreable, I am at a Loss to guess in what particular. Manners comprehend Curtesy, Civility, Hospitality and graceful Attitudes Gestures and Motions. In point of Civility I have not been wanting: in Hospitality I have gone beyond not only all the Means that their Generosity has furnished, but beyond all the Income of my private fortune. instead therefore of reforming in this particular in their 25 Sense I am determined to alter according to my own sense and live more within my income. As to Elegance of Behaviour, without making any vain pretensions in this respect, I may boldly affirm that there is no southern Gentleman has right to reproach me, except the President, and he I know has no disposition to do it.
That there is or will be a Rival, I doubt not. There is a
French Intrigue at Work, to this Purpose as deep as it is wicked. My Country
men with all their Sagacity and with all their Vigilance, are not enough
acquainted with the World, nor with the History of their own Revolution, to
be upon their Guard against political Inventions, concealed with infinite
Art purposed urged with unwearied
dilligence, multiplied and varied with fruitful Ingenuity, and pursued with
long perseverance. Panegyricks upon Panegyricks come from Europe upon some
Characters in order to lessen others; Politicks are carried on instead of
Philosophy in learned and scientific Accademies Newspapers from Georgia to
New Hampshire and Magazines &c are cooked & dressed. The Populace
are made the Dupes of their own feelings, Aristocrats are bloated with their
own pride. To me these Things are familiar. I have been a suffering Witness
and have a good Memory. But my Misfortune is that no Man knows them all but
myself. But I will own to you, all that ever I have suffered, has never made
so deep an Impression on me as to see New England duped more than all the
rest: and made the blind Instrument of punishing the only Friends she ever
had, for their Friendship to her.— I Shall go on however as long as
independent Spirit and Principles will support me. but the first moment
these fail me, will be considered as a Revelation of the Will of Heaven to
retire.
yours
RC (NjP:Andre De Coppet Coll.); addressed: “John
Trumbull Esq / Councillor at Law / Hartford / Connecticutt.”; internal
address: “Mr Trumbull.”; endorsed: “Honble.
John Adams / March 31st. 1791”; notation by
JA: “Free / John Adams.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 115.
The Laws of Plato,
transl. A. E. Taylor, London, 1934, Book IV, p. 96, and Book VIII, p.
218–219.
th.1791
I have just received a letter from Mr. Short which I wish to submit, in order to
certain measures being taken upon it, to yourself and the heads of the
executive departments, in pursuance of the 26
President’s letter of the 4th. instant, which I
take it for granted has been communicated to you by the Secretary of
State.1
I request therefore that you will please to name a time and place for the meeting; and that it may be as early as will be convenient to you after tomorrow.—
I have the honor to be / With the most respectful attachment, / Sir, / Your Obedient servant
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Vice President of the /
United States.—”; endorsed: “Secretary of the Treasury / ansd 9. April.”
Hamilton referred to a 2 Dec. 1790 letter from
William Short, who was managing the Dutch-American loans in Europe.
Short had negotiated a new loan for 2.5 million guilders, which he
secured at a favorable interest rate from the Amsterdam consortium of
Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and
Nicolaas Hubbard. George Washington’s cabinet, still holding only
informal advisory meetings, met as JA described in his reply of the same
day, below. Hamilton replied to Short on 13 April 1791,
authorizing the contract and instructing him to open another loan for 3
million guilders (Hamilton,
Papers
, 7:175–187, 280; 8:52,
57).