Papers of John Adams, volume 21
J’airecu la lettre que vous m’avez fait l’honneur de m’écrire, Le 8 du mois dernier, en réponse à la mienne du mois Précédent.1 Les objets dont je m’occupe, Sont liés à L’intéret public, et n’en Seront que plus dignes de fixer votre attention. J’espere me rendre à Philadelphie, La Semaine prochaine. Ma premiere affaire Sera de Vous présenter mon respect, aussitot que j’y serai arrivé. Ensuite, je Vous demanderai vos bontés; Si les travaux que j’ai faits ici, Vous Paroissent favorables à votre pays: c’est le jugement, qu’en ont porté les personnes, que j’ai consultées a new-york, et aux quelles je suis redevable des avis, sur les quels je me suis dirigé. On m’a assuré que les principes, que j’invoque, et qui sont ceux de L’Europe, sont également ceux des principaux membres des états unis, et qu’il ne leur a manqué que l’occasion de Les appliquer.
L’essay Sur le droit canon et le droit féodal, dont vous
Parlez avec La modestie qui vous est naturelle, a été imprimé en 1784. J’en
ai vu un exemplaire, qui avoit ete donné a Adennet; et j’ai pensé que
c’etoit à vous qu’il en etoit redevable mais, actuellement je crois me
rappeller qu’il le dut à Mr Abeil secrétaire du
commerce, ou au Pere de Mr. Genet.2 cet ouvrage, Monsieur, quoiqui
écrit en 1765, posoit déja les principes, qui seroient le fondement de Votre
liberté; et qui l’eussent été aussi de la notre; Si la france avoit eu des
Génies tutélaires; mais, elle manquoit de cet avantage, qui seul a fait les
159 succés de votre Patrie. Dès 1789, je
répétois sans cesse à Mr de Gouvion3 et à M Bailly, qu’il étoit
impossible de dire où notre révolution s’arréteroit; parce que personne n’en
etoit L’Ame: on y savoit mettre La multitude en mouvement: elle détruit et
ne rebati point. mais, ce sujet, si je m’y abandonnois, me meneroit trop
loin. Je le quitte.
Je Suis avec Respect / Monsieur / Votre tres humble / et tres obeissant Serviteur
TRANSLATION
I received the letter that you did me the honor to write to me on the 8th of last month, replying to mine of the preceding month.1 The subjects I treat are related to the public interest, and will thus be all the worthier of holding your attention. I hope to go to Philadephia next week. The first order of affairs for me will be to present my respects to you, as soon as I arrive there. Next, I will ask your favor if the efforts I have made here seem to you favorable to your country. This is the judgment that others have made of it whom I consulted in New York, and to whom I am beholden for the advice by which I tailored my actions. I have been assured that the principles which I invoke and which are those of Europe, are equally those of the principal members of the United States, and for whom only the opportunity to apply them has been lacking.
The essay on canon and feudal law, of which you speak with the modesty natural to you, was printed in 1784. I saw a copy of it which had been given to Adennet, and I thought at first that it was to you that he was obliged for it but, presently I seem to remember that he owed it to Mr. Abeil, the commerce secretary, or to Mr. Genet’s father.2 This work, sir, though written in 1765, already established principles which would later be the foundation of your liberty, and which would equally have been that of ours, if France had tutelary deities. But she lacked that advantage, which alone determined the success of your nation. From 1789 on, I was reiterating to Mr. de Gouvion3 and Mr. Bailly that it was impossible to say where our revolution would end, as no one was its soul. We knew how to set the masses in motion: they destroy and do not rebuild. But if I were to let myself go on this subject, it would lead me astray. I leave it at that.
I am respectfully, sir, your most humble and most obedient servant
RC (Adams Papers).
Neither letter has been found. La Rocque, a
government translator and editor who arrived in the United States in
1793, published various essays on political economy (from La Rocque, 12
April, below; Frances Sergeant Childs, French Refugee Life in the United States, 1790–1800: An American
Chapter of the French Revolution, Baltimore, 1940, p. 134, 135;
Hamilton, Papers
, 16:234).
JA’s “A Dissertation on the Canon and
the Feudal Law,” first published in 1765, resonated with many in La
Rocque’s circle of 160
French public servants, including the translator Mr. Addenet, for whom
see vols. 9 and 10:index. Economist Louis Paul Abeille (1719–1807) had
served as secretary of commerce since 1768, and Edmé Jacques Genet
(1715–1781) headed the foreign ministry’s bureau of translators, often
supplying JA with English-language newspapers (vols. 1:103–128, 17:253;
Michel Foucault, Security, Territory,
Population: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1977–1978,
transl. Graham Burchell, N.Y., 2007, p. 52). For Edmond Charles
“Citizen” Genet, see Tench Coxe’s 5 April 1793 letter, and note 4, below.
Jean Baptiste de Gouvion (1747–1792) was an engineer
and former French Army captain (Franklin, Papers
, 23:160–161).
Having imparted to our mutual Friends Messrs: W. & J Willink of Amsterdam, my wish to
procure the Appointment of American Consul at this Port, they very politely
presented me with the enclosed Introduction, & recommendation to your
Excellency, for that purpose, the Necessity of the Appointment,1 I make no doubt is well known to
your Excellency, as well as the general Advantage and Conveniency, which
would result from it to the numerous Citizens of the United States, who have
occasion to touch at this Port for the Purpose of obtaining Information as
to the Situation of the different European Markets for American Produce, or
otherwise, & I flatter myself the Recommendation of our abovementioned
will fully Satisfy your Excellency as to the respectability of the Person
for whom they Interest themselves, and his Capacity, & inclination to
discharge the Duties of the Office, with Honor to himself, and every
possible Attention to the Interests of the Subjects of the United States,
therefore I presume it needless to mention any thing further, on that
Subject, than to assure that during a long residence with them, we ever
Coincided in our endeavors to Promote the Interest of the United States on
every Occasion.
Having said thus much, I take the Liberty to Sollicit of
your Excellency such an Appointment; or shou’d it remain in the Province of
the Secretary of State, that you will be pleased to hand him this Letter,
accompanied with Messrs: Willink’s
Recommendation, which I presume will have equal weight with him as your
Excellency.
With Assurances of Profound respect, I have the Honor to Subscribe myself Sir / your Excellency’s Most Obedient / Humble Servant
m:Lake
Dupl (Adams Papers).
The enclosure has not been found. Lake, a merchant
and longtime resident of Falmouth, England, did not earn this post.
Edward Fox served as the U.S. consul at Falmouth from 1793 to 1794 (Selection of Reports and Papers of the House of
Commons, London, 1836, 20:183; Walter Burges Smith, America’s Diplomats and Consuls of 1776–1865: A
Geographic and Biographic Directory of the Foreign Service,
Washington, D.C., 1986, p. 58).