Papers of John Adams, volume 21
d:1792.
I have received and read with much pleasure your kind
letter of the 20th: Ult; Your sympathy with me
under the base effusions of mallice and falshood ought to be converted into
shame for your Country, which wanted virtue, sense and spirit to
discountenance what will remain a lasting disgrace to America to the press
and to letters. A Brown, a Markoe, & a Finley, suffered to insult for a
whole Summer! Whom?1
Emulation is inseparable from the human mind. Elective
Monarchies, however limited are the rankest soil in which emulation can be
planted, and the Government of the United States as well as that of every
individual State is to all intents and purposes an Elective tho’ limited
Monarchy; however ignorant people may amuse one another with eternal
repetitions of the words Republic and Commonwealth, which they understand
not.— I own I did not expect that truth, honor and virtue would so soon have
been trampled under foot in America—as much aware as I was of the turpitude
usually produced by ambitious rivalries. You mention one very grave and
serious charge against me which I never heard of before; to be sure 107 it deserves a sober refutation. You
say—Mr Ad——s does not walk the Streets
enough.— This I deny— I can prove by many witnesses that I walk a league in
the Streets of Philadelpha: every day, which is
more than any other member of Congress ever did. So that in this respect I
am undoubtedly the man of the most merit, any where to be found.
The funding system is the hair shirt which our sinful country must wear as a propitiation for her past dishonesty. The only way to get rid of speculation is to hasten the rise of our stocks to the standard beyond which they cannot ascend. Clamor and murmur will do no good. The bad morals of the people brought them into this situation, together with their ignorance; and their bad morals and their ignorance will keep them in it, if they should obstruct or divert the public councils from pursuing the scientific principles of social order and political œconomy. Do our people imagine that those who buy land will not buy as cheap as they can, and sell as dear as they can? Mercantile bargains and sales are not made pro bono publico. Do we expect that Dutch Capitalists or English Merchants or American speculators in Lands, or funds, will spend their time and employ their Capitals as Washington and La Fayette serve their Countries for nothing. It is time my friend that honest men should commune with one another, or unanimously agree to retire to obscurity together.
I am sincerely / Your affectionate friend
LbC in TBA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal
address: “Honble Henry Marchant. / Newport.
R. I.”; APM Reel 115.
JA identified a cluster of politicians
and writers who espoused Democratic-Republican ideas, including incoming
Kentucky senator John Brown (1757–1837), Pennsylvania representative
William Findley (ca. 1741–1821), and Peter Markoe (ca. 1752–1792), a
Philadelphia playwright (
Biog. Dir. Cong.
; Daniel S. Burt,
ed., The Chronology of American Literature:
America’s Literary Achievements from the Colonial Era to Modern
Times, Boston, 2004, p. 85).
th.1792.
I flatter myself that your Excellency will not consider
me as importunate, in addressing you on the subject of the conversation you
indulged me the honor with a few Days’ since on my soliciting your
Excellency’s interference in my behalf to be continued in employ during the
recesses of the Senate particularly. I
should not trouble your Excellency again, were it not for the circumstance
of Mr. Otis having mentioned to me a day or two
since that he “had thoughts of
108
shutting up the Office during the recess, and having
the business brought up during the Sessions by employing additional
Clerks.”— Your Excellencys goodness and liberality will indulge me
in a few observations on this subject—
Your Excellency will, on referring to the 4th. Section of the Act entitled, “An Act for
allowing compensation to the Members of the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States, and to the Officers of both Houses”
find the words following
“And the said Secretary and Clerk shall each be allowed
(when the President of the Senate or Speaker
shall deem it necessary) to employ one Principal Clerk, who shall
be paid three Dollars per Day, and an Engrossing Clerk, who shall be paid
two Dollars per Day during the Session, with the like compensation to such
Clerk while he shall be necessarily employed in the recess.”— Your
Excellency will perceive that the Law in this case invests you with the sole power of judging of the necessity of employing
the Clerks allowed by law— I would also infer that your Excellency
has the power of nominating them. The whole scope of the words first quoted
establishes this Principle that the Secretary is
required by Law to apply for your Excellencys permission before he can
employ a Clerk— It is upon this ground that I solicit your
Excellency’s patronage, and I rely so much upon it, from the circumstance of
the very flattering notice with which your Excellency has been pleased to
honor me, that I entertain the hope that you will further honor me in your
attention to the subject and if you shall be satisfied that there is
business to keep me employed, that you will so order it.1
I with deference observe on the words of Mr. Otis in respect to having the Office shut during the recess and employing additional
Clerks during the Sessions that I conceive little or no Money would
be saved to the public by this mode—and if it were pursued there would be a
species of cruelty exercised towards a
Servant of the public who has been in the Office almost from its
establishment that his conduct and services does not merit; and mention the
circumstance to your Excellency to intreat you to induce, from the
generosity and goodness of your heart, Mr. Otis
from proceeding to carry this idea into effect— Your Excellency will pardon
me in mentioning the recent circumstance of the grant to Mr. Mathers2 for compensation during the recess
of one Dollar and an half per Day—and I do but justice to the Liberality of
your Excellency & the Senate in concluding that it is your wish and
intention that your Servants should be recompensed in the Recess for their
extra services during the 109
Sessions— It is to this Liberality I appeal when I ask of your Excellency
that patronage which will insure to me a compensation consistent with the
liberal views of the Legislature and equal to my services.
It is with the view only of shewing that I am not
soliciting for a sinecure that I mention to your Excellency the present
State of the business of the Office so far as relates to what is principally
to be recorded in the recess; the which if your Excellency will trouble
yourself with an enquiry respecting it I trust you will find correct.—
Independent of business of less consequence there is yet to be recorded above half of the Legislative Journal of the last
Session and the Executive and Legislative Journal of the present Session
and a recorded Copy of the Executive Journal which the Senate
recently Ordered for the President of the United States. The Recording of
these will require considerable time to bring up & much more than the
ensuing recess will allow; of course there is sufficient business for employ
during the recess.
I will not presume upon the patience of your Excellency
by saying further on the subject than to express my wish, that as your
Excellency did me the honor to say you would attend to the subject, that I
shall be made happy in the patronage of your Excellency in this case; the
impression this condescending generosity will make on my sensibility will
stimulate me to merit it by the purest
principles of gratitude and an unremitted assiduity to perform the duties of
my station.
With the most perfect Respect / I have the honor to be / Sir, / Your Excellency’s / most obedient and / most Humble Servant
t.Heysham.
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency / The Vice President of the / United States”; endorsed: “Letter from / Robt Heysham / March 1792.”
As secretary of the Senate, Samuel Allyne Otis worked
with a small staff when Congress began operation in 1789. By 1791,
Philadelphia-born Robert Heysham (ca. 1758–ca. 1821) rose from his
original position as engrossing clerk to serve as principal clerk. In
the period from 1 Jan. to 4 March, Heysham earned more than Otis,
receiving $3 per day in comparison to the secretary’s daily rate of $2,
which netted Heysham a quarterly salary of $189 in contrast to Otis’ of
$126 (
First Fed. Cong.
, 1:ix, 8:825; Biographical Annals of Montgomery County,
Pennsylvania, ed. Ellwood Roberts, 2 vols., N.Y., 1904,
2:27).
On 1 March 1792 the Senate considered a similar query
from Irish-born James Mathers (1750–1811), who served as the Senate
doorkeeper from 1789 until his death. In 1791, he was paid $3 per day
(
AFC
, 11:151;
First Fed.
Cong.
, 8:825; U.S. Senate, Jour.
, 2d Cong.,
1st sess., p. 401).