Papers of John Adams, volume 20

From John Adams to George Mason Jr., 4 July 1789 Adams, John Mason, George Jr.
To George Mason Jr.
Dear Sir Richmond hill July 4 1789

With great pleasure, I received your kind letter of the twenty fifth of last month,1 give me leave to congratulate you on your marriage, the increase of your family, and your happy settlement on your plantation.2 I have known by repeated experience enough of the pleasure of returning from the life of a traveller in Europe, to the pleasures of domestic life, in a calm retreat in the country, to be very sensible of your situation’s being enviable. I thank you Sir, for the friendly and respectful confidence in me, with which you have communicated your desires in favour of Mr Joseph Fenwick to be Consul at Bourdeaux. Your recommendation has weight with me: but you know very well that the duty of looking out for the fittest men for all employments, is by the constitution imposed on the President, who I am well persuaded will discharge it with all that fidelity which is due to his Country, and all the impartiality which becomes a father of his people. As Mr Jefferson is expected from France, perhaps no appointment will be made in that country untill his arrival.3 Mr Fenwick is probably known to the President: if not, it will be very natural that information and Judgment will be asked of the Gent: from Virginia and Maryland, whose knowledge of the person is personal, and should therefore be taken in preference to mine, which can only be at second hand. The candidates for such appointments will in most instances be numerous, and their services, merits and qualifications various. The great Magistrate, whose right it is will I doubt not, determine among them all in a manner that will give satisfaction to the publick.

Your congratulations on my late appointments are very obliging. The Duties, of my office require a constant and laborious attention: but there is so much information, candor and dignity in the characters with whom I am associated, that application to business in concert with them is pleasure.

I am & &

John Adams

LbC in CA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “George Mason Junr: Esqr / Colchester, Virginia—”; APM Reel 115.

1.

Mason’s letter of 25 June (Adams Papers) recommended Maryland-born merchant Joseph Fenwick (1762–1849) to serve as the U.S. consul at Bordeaux. For the past year, Fenwick had operated, with Mason’s brother John, a trading firm in the French port, which supplied wine to JA, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson. Fenwick’s main 53 rival for the position was John Bondfield, who had acted as the American commercial agent for Bordeaux, Bayonne, Rochefort, and La Rochelle since March 1778. When Washington nominated Fenwick on 4 June 1790, he mistakenly wrote “James Fenwick” but sent a note of correction to the Senate on 23 June. Fenwick was confirmed by the Senate on 7 June, and he served as U.S. consul to France until 1801 (vols. 6:10, 9:103; Richard C. Allen, “Nantucket Quakers and Negotiating the Politics of the Atlantic World,” in Marie Jeanne Rossignol and Bertrand Van Ruymbeke, eds., The Atlantic World of Anthony Benezet (1713–1784): From French Reformation to North American Quaker Antislavery Activism, Leyden, 2017, p. 123; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 3:53, 54; 5:474–476; Jefferson, Papers , 8:158).

2.

Elizabeth Mary Anne Barnes Hooe (b. 1768), of Barnesfield, Va., married Mason on 22 April 1784. They lived on the Doegs’ Neck, Va., plantation of Lexington, named in 1775 to commemorate the Revolutionary War battle, and at this time they had three children: Elizabeth, George, and William (“Notes and Queries,” VMHB , 52:276 [Oct. 1944]; Pamela C. Copeland and Richard K. MacMaster, The Five George Masons: Patriots and Planters of Virginia and Maryland, 2d edn., Fairfax, Va., 2016, p. 250).

3.

On 23 Aug. 1789 Jefferson received John Jay’s 19 June letter, enclosing a Senate resolution of 18 June that approved his return and named William Short as the American chargé d’affaires. Fleeing the French Revolution’s upheaval, Jefferson sailed from Le Havre to Cowes, England, on 7 Oct., making a turbulent crossing via the Clermont, Capt. Nathaniel Colley. He arrived in Norfolk, Va., on 23 Nov., where he was greeted by citizens who thanked him for his diplomatic work, to which Jefferson replied: “That my country should be served is the first wish of my heart: I should be doubly happy indeed were I to render it a service” (Jefferson, Papers , 15:202–203, 496, 521, 546, 553, 556–557).

To John Adams from Stephen Higginson, 4 July 1789 Higginson, Stephen Adams, John
From Stephen Higginson
Sir Boston July 4: 1789

Since I had the honour of seeing you at your own house, I have been so unwell, & so much occupied with my private Business, when able to attend to it, that I have not had an oppy of writing to you, as you requested & I engaged to do. Nor can I now do more than just to inform you, that, as the British are coming fast into their old practice, of taking from hence the Rum necessary for their Factories upon the Coast of Guinea, a draw back on Our Rum exported to foreign markets is important to the Commerce of this state.1 more than 1200 hhds have this year been called for by them; & so fond are the Africans of this spirit, that was it freed from the duty when exported thither, I have no doubt the British would soon take several thousands of hhds annually.—

as Our molasses Trade is the main branch of Business in this state, & is really the chief support of Our Cod fishery, as well as necessary to several other important branches of Our Commerce, it is a great point to have it as free as possible from unnecessary expences & embarrassments. the amount of Our export of Rum to foreign markets may now be fairly estimated at 3000 hhds a year; & 54 there can be no doubt of its soon amounting to twice or thrice that quantity if it was not loaded with the duty; for every market we now have for it abroad will be increasing in its use of & demand for it, unless the increase of the price prevents. two pence per gallon is no small Object in that Article, it is sufficient perhaps to secure to us permanently, or to deprive us wholly of the supply to the markets alluded to.—

it strikes me as very singular & unequal, that there should be a drawback generally upon foreign Imports when re exported; & none allowed upon a principal export of this state. If the former is admitted upon the principle of giving facility & extension to Commerce, will not the same Reason apply as strongly in the latter case. it is true the former may affect the other states more than the latter; but if to load exports to foreign markets with duties is anti commercial, if the principle be good, as a general case, it will not be objected that we shall principally be benefitted by it in this case. This would savour strong indeed of locality, & confirm the Idea here, that southern Gentlemen are jealous of, & wish to restrain us in Our Trade.—

If a drawback be refused on Rum lest the Revenue be injured, the Objection will apply as forcibly, at least, to the general provision; for surely the former case is capable of as many good Checks, as in any Case that occurs to me. the general allowance of drawbacks will give many openings, without great care is taken, to defraud the Revenue. a variety of deceptions may there be practised from the extent & complexity of the Objects; but here we have a single Article only to attend to, & this we can check in the hands of the Distillers who are few in number. I fear these hasty Observations may be too late, & perhaps not sufficiently clear & weighty to merit attention; but as I could not believe, till within a day or two, that a drawback on Our Rum could eventually be refused, I may be excused for not troubling you sooner on the subject, & it must be my Apology for now doing it thus hastily.—

Should Congress appoint the inferior Officers in the executive departments, & think it expedient to continue such in Office as have conducted well, permit me to say that I think Mr. Joseph Hiller naval Officer for Salem is one of the best in the state.2 his integrity, accuracy & faculty of executing rigidly the duties of his Office without giving Offence, are much greater than common. I am induced to say this of him, having been lately informed, that several in that Town have applied for the Office, expecting the appointment will be made by Congress, who are by no means his equals for such a post.—

55

With the most respectful Regard for your Lady & family, & most sincere wishes for your health & happiness, I have the honour to be Your Excellencys most humble Servant—

Stephen Higginson

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “The Hon. S. Higginson / 4. July. / Ansd. 14. 1789.”

1.

For the debate over the molasses duty, see JA’s 12 June letter to Cotton Tufts, and note 2, above.

2.

Joseph Hiller (1748–1814), of Boston, formerly a major in the Continental Army, was nominated by George Washington on 3 Aug. to serve as collector for the ports of Salem and Beverly, Mass., and was confirmed by the Senate the same day (Essex Inst., Hist. Colls. , 3:123 [June 1861]; U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour. , 1st Cong., 1st sess., p. 9, 12).