Papers of John Adams, volume 20

To John Adams from William MacCreery, 11 December 1790 MacCreery, William Adams, John
From William MacCreery
Dear Sir Baltimore 11 December 1790

Altho’ it be the fate of persons high in power to be exposed to the importunity of the many, and they are obliged not only to suffer, but submit to it, I assure you I feel much repugnance in troubling you with this letter.1

The arrival of a Vessell here in the last summer with a number of German-passengers after a very tedious voyage, having communicated a contagious distemper to some of the inhabitants, hath at last convinced us of the necessity of a Pest-house near this Town, and consequently of the appointment of a health-officer; and having of late been rather over stock’d with Gentlemen of the Faculty, not less than seven have started for this small plate!2 It is for this reason that I have interested myself in behalf of my Freind & Neighbour Doctor John Coulter—not merely because he is my Freind and neighbour, but because he is well qualified for the place, and has, in my oppinion, a better claim to it than any other person whatever. He has resided in this Town upwards of Twenty Years; has been a steady, uniform patriot, served in our Navy, and several Years on the Bench with much reputation. He has rendered most essential service to his Country in the late conflicts with the enemies of the present Constitution; having served in our assembly that Year to the no small prejudice of his Family. All this is well known to Mr. Carroll of the Senate, & to Mr. Smith of the lower House, to whom I beg leave to refer you. Doctor Coulter wou’d not have needed my recommendation on this occasion, had not his competitors got a great start of him in their applications for Petitions & certificates; as they reside in Town, & he at the Point—the latter however is the most eligible situation for the office he solicits. If the appointment rested with the inhabitants of this Town at large, there is no doubt but Dr. Coulter 445 wou’d carry it by a very large Majority; Doctor Gilder (one of the applicants) having served all, or most of the war as surgeon in the Army, has certainly strong claims on the public, but Doctor Coulters situation, long residence and services amongst us, gives him I think, a superior claim to the place in question, to all the other candidates.

Let me therefore beg of you, Sir, in virtue of that goodness you were wont to shew me on former occasions, that any services you can render Doctor Coulter in this bussiness, with propriety, may be done, and placed to my debit—for his good conduct therein, if appointed, I venture to hold myself responsable—

With the greatest respect, & most sincere attachment I have the honor to be / Dear Sir / Your Obliged Hle Servt.

Will MacCreery

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Honorable J. Adams V. P. U. S. Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Mr MacCreery / 11. Decr. ansd 27. / 1790.”

1.

Ulster, Ireland, native MacCreery (1750–1814) was a Baltimore merchant who transmitted goods for the Adamses during the Revolutionary War. He represented Maryland in the House of Representatives from 1803 to 1809 (vol. 5:299; Biog. Dir. Cong. ).

2.

This may have been the Baltimore-bound brigantine Venus, Capt. Pajeken, which sailed from Bremen on 6 Oct. 1789 and did not return there until 20 July 1790. To address a growing need on the docks, MacCreery recommended the appointment of John Coulter (ca. 1751–1823), of County Down, Ireland, who had been a Continental Navy surgeon. Five more local physicians applied: George Buchanan, Reuben Gilder, James Wynkoop, John Ross, and Capt. Benjamin Dashiell.

Taking up the issue on 16 Dec., the House of Representatives read a petition from Baltimore citizens requesting a health officer to protect the city from foreign diseases, and it was referred to committee. On 21 Dec. the committee advised the establishment of health officers in U.S. ports and began to draft legislation, but the project languished until 6 June 1794, when the House consented to a Maryland state law of 28 Dec. 1793 appointing Baltimore doctors John Ross, Thomas Drysdale, and John Worthington as health officers (Maryland Journal, 6 Oct. 1789, 20 July 1790; Jefferson, Papers , 18:472; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 7:107, 108, 116, 174, 255; 13:518; Baltimore American & Commercial Daily Advertiser, 29 May 1823; John R. Quinan, Medical Annals of Baltimore from 1608 to 1880, Baltimore, 1884, p. 18, 19).

Address from the Senate to George Washington, 13 December [1790] Adams, John Washington, George
Address from the Senate to George Washington
Monday December 13th 1791 [1790]

At twelve o’clock the Senate attended upon the President of the United States at his own House, when the President of the Senate delivered the following Address.1

To the President of the United States of America.

We receive, Sir, with particular satisfaction the communications contained in your Speech, which confirm to us the progressive State of the public Credit, and afford at the same time, a new proof of the 446 solidity of the foundation on which it rests; and we chearfully join in the acknowledgement, which is due to the probity and patriotism of the mercantile and Marine part of our fellow Citizens, whose enlightened attachment to the principles of good government is not less conspicuous in this, than it has been in other important respects.

In confidence that every constitutional preliminary has been observed, we assure you of our disposition to concur in giving the requisite Sanction to the admission of Kentucky as a distinct member of the Union, in doing which, we shall anticipate the happy effects to be expected from the sentiments of attachment towards the Union and its present government, which have been expressed by the Patriotic inhabitants of that District.2

While we regret that the continuance and increase of the hostilities and depredations which have distressed our north western Frontier, should have rendered Affensive measures necessary, we feel an entire confidence in the sufficiency of the motives which have produced them, and in the wisdom of the dispositions which have been concerted in pursuance of the powers vested in you; and whatever may have been the event, we shall chearfully concur in the provisions which the expedition that has been undertaken may require on the part of the Legislature, and in any other which the future peace and safety of our frontier Settlements may call for.

The critical posture of the European Powers will engage a due portion of our Attention, and we shall be ready to adopt any measures, which a prudent circumspection may suggest, for the preservation of the blessings of Peace: The navigation and fisheries of the United States, are objects too interesting not to inspire a disposition to promote them, by all the means, which shall appear to us, consistent with their natural progress, and permanent prosperity.

Impressed with the importance of a free intercourse with the Mediterranean, we shall not think any Deliberations misemployed which may conduce to the adoption of proper measures for removing the impediments that obstructed it.

The improvement of the judiciary system, and the other important objects, to which you have pointed our attention will not fail to engage the consideration they respectively merit.

In the course of our deliberations, upon every subject, we shall rely upon that co-operation which an undeminished zeal, and incessant anxiety for the public welfare on your part, so thoroughly ensure; and as it is our anxious desire, so it shall be our constant endeavour, to render the established Government more and more instrumental 447 in promoting the good of our fellow citizens, and more and more the object of their attachment and confidence.

United States of America.

In Senate December the 13th 1790

John Adams. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.—

FC (DLC:Washington Papers).

1.

Senators Oliver Ellsworth, Rufus King, and Ralph Izard prepared the formal response to George Washington’s 8 Dec. address to Congress, for which see JA’s letter to Thomas Mifflin of 7 Dec., and note 1, above. At noon on 13 Dec., JA accompanied the senators to the President’s House, located at Sixth and Market Streets, where he read the address ( First Fed. Cong. , 1:501, 505, 506, 507).

2.

Residents of Kentucky, then part of Virginia, petitioned Congress on 29 Feb. 1788 seeking statehood. On 3 July their request was deferred pending the implementation of the U.S. Constitution. Virginia lawmakers, mindful of a faction within Kentucky interested in Spanish sovereignty in exchange for access to the Mississippi River, passed an act of separation on 18 Dec. 1789, scheduling a special convention on 26 July 1790 and mandating that the new state join the union. The convention met and accepted the terms. Congress passed an act approving the petition for statehood on 4 Feb. 1791, and Kentucky was admitted on 1 June 1792 (Abernethy, The South in the New Nation , p. 51, 69; Lowell H. Harrison and James C. Klotter, A New History of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky., 1997, p. 61).