Papers of John Adams, volume 20

From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 18 April 1790 Adams, John Rush, Benjamin
To Benjamin Rush
Dear sir New York April 18. 1790

Your letter of April 13, soars above the visible diurnal Sphære.— I own to you that avarice Ambition the Love of Fame &c are all mysterious Passions. They are the greatest Absurdities, Delusions and Follies that can be imagined, if in this Life only We had hope.

In the Boat on our Return from Point no Point, the principal Topick of Conversation was Independence.— an intercepted Letter early in 1775 had informed the World that I was for Independence. and my Sentiments on this head were no Secret in Congress from May 1775—1 But I was left too much alone— The Company in the Boat appeared to me, then and ever Since, to have invited me to be of their Party, that they might all assure me in that Confidential manner, that they were of my mind and would Ultimately Support me. There was not one of the Company I believe, who in the Course of the Passage did not repeatedly Assure me, that in his opinion We must be independent.— That Evenings Conversation was a great Encouragement2 to me, ever after.

How many Follies and indiscreet Speeches do your minutes in your Note Book bring to my Recollection, which I had forgotten forever! Alass I fear I am not yet much more prudent.—

Your Character of Mr Paine is very well and very just.

To The Accusation against me which you have recorded in Your Note Book of 17th of March last, I plead not guilty.— I deny both Charges. I deny an “Attachment to Monarchy” and I deny that I 320 have “changed my Principles Since 1776.”— No Letter of mine to Mr Hooper was ever printed that I know of. indeed I have but a very confused Recollection of having ever written him any Letter. if any Letter has been printed in my Name I desire to see it.— You know that a Letter of mine to Mr Wythe was printed by Dunlap, in Jany 1776 under the Title of Thoughts on Government in a Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend. in that Pamphlet, I recommended a Legislature in three independent Branches and to Such a Legislature I am Still attached. But I own at that time I understood very little of the subject, and if I had changed my opinions should have no Scruple to avow it. I own that awful Experience has concurred with Reading and Reflection to convince me that Americans are more rapidly disposed to Corruption in Elections, than I thought they were fourteen Years ago.

My Friend Dr Rush will excuse me if I caution him against a fraudulent Use of the Words Monarchy and Republick. I am a mortal and irreconcileable Ennemy to Monarchy.— I am no Friend to hereditary limited Monarchy in America. This I know can never be admitted, without an hereditary Senate to controul it. and an hereditary Nobility or senate in America I know to be unattainable and impracticable. I Should Scarcely be for it, if it were attainable. Dont therefore my Friend misunderstand me and misrepresent me to Posterity.— I am for a Ballance between the Legislative and Executive Powers and I am for enabling the Executive to be at all times capable of maintaining the Ballance between the Senate and House, or in other Words between the Aristocratical and Democratical Interests— Yet I am for having all three Branches elected at Stated Periods. and these Elections I hope will continue, untill the People Shall be convinced, that Fortune Providence or Chance call it which you will, is better than Election. if the time should come when Corruption shall be added to Intrigue and Manœuvre in Elections and produce civil War, then in my opinion Chance will be better than Choice for all but the House of Representatives.

accept my Thanks for your polite and obliging Invitation to Philadelphia. nothing would give me greater Pleasure, than such a Visit but I must deny my self that satisfaction. I know I have friends in Pensilvania, and Such as I esteem, very highly as the Friends of Virtue Liberty and Good Government.

What you may mean by “more than British degrees of Corruption” at New York and by Sophisticated Government, I know not.— The Continent is a kind of Whispering Gallery and Acts and Speeches 321 are reverberated round from N. York in all Directions. The Report is very loud at a distance, when the Whisper, is very gentle in the Center. But if you See Such Corruptions, in your Countrymen, on what do you found your hopes?

I lament the deplorable Condition of my Country, which Seems to be under such a Fatality that the People can agree upon nothing. When they seem to agree, they are so unsteady, that it is but for a Moment.— that Changes may be made for the better is probable— I know of no Change that would occasion much Danger but that of President. I wish very heartily that a Change of Vice President could be made tomorrow. I have been too ill used in the Office to be fond of it, if I had not been introduced into it, in a manner that made it a disgrace. I will never Serve in it again upon Such Terms.— though I have acted in public with immense Multitudes, I have had few friends and these certainly not interested ones—these I shall ever love in public or private.

Adieu my dear sir

J. Adams

RC (NHi:Gilder Lehrman Coll., on deposit); internal address: “Dr Rush.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 115.

1.

For JA’s intercepted letters of 1775, which were widely printed in American and British newspapers, see vol. 3:90, 92–93.

2.

In the LbC, CA wrote “comfort.”

From John Adams to Richard Price, 19 April 1790 Adams, John Price, Richard
To Richard Price
My dear Friend. New York April 19 1790.

Accept of my best Thanks for your favour of Feb. 1st. and the excellent Discourse that came with it. I love the Zeal and the Spirit which dictated this Discourse, and admire the general Sentiments of it. From the year 1760 to this hour, the whole Scope of my Life has been to Support Such Principles and propagate Such Sentiments. No Sacrifices of myself or my family. No dangers, no labours, have been too much for me in this great cause. The Revolution in France could not, therefore be indifferent to me. But I have learned, by awfull Experience, to rejoice with trembling. I know that Encyclopedists and Œconomists, Diderot and D’Alembert, Voltaire and Rousseau, have contributed to this great Event, more than Locke, Sidney or Hoadley,1 and perhaps more than the American Revolution. And I own to you, I know not what to make of a Republick of Thirty Million Atheists.

The Constitution is but an Eperiment; and must and will be 322 altered. I know it to be impossible that France Should be long governed by it. If the Sovereignty is to reside in one Assembly: The King, the Princes of the blood, and principal Quality, will govern it, at their pleasure, as long as they can agree. When they differ they will go to War, and act over again, all the Tragedies of Valois, Bourbons, Lorrains Guises and Colignis, two hundred Years ago.2

The Greeks sang the praises of Harmodius and Aristogiton for restoring equal Laws.—3 Too many Frenchmen, after the example of too many Americans, pant for Equality of Persons and Property. The impracticability of this, God almighty has decreed, and the Advocates for Liberty who attempt it, will Surely Suffer for it.

I thank you, Sir, for your kind Compliment.— As it has been the great Aim of my life to be Usefull; if I had any reason to think I was So, as you Seem to Suppose, it would make me happy. For “Eminence” I care nothing.— For, though I pretend not to be exempt from Ambition, or any other human passion, I have been convinced from my Infancy, and have been confirmed, every year and day of my life, that the Mechanic and Peasant, are happier than any Nobleman or Magistrate or King; and that the higher a man rises, if he has any Sense of duty, the more anxious he must be.

Our new Government, is a new Attempt to divide a Sovereignty. A fresh Essay at Imperium in Imperio. It cannot, therefore, be expected to be very Stable, or very firm. It will prevent Us, for a time, from drawing our Swords Upon each other: and when it will do that, no longer We must call a Convention to reform it.

The difficulty of bringing millions to agree in any measures, to act by any rule; can never be conceived by him, who has not tried it. It is incredible, how Small is the number, in any Nation of those who comprehend any System of Constitution, or Administration: and those few it is wholly impossible to Unite.

I am a Sincere Inquirer after Truth.— But I find very few, who discover the Same Truths. The King of Prussia has found one, which has also fallen in my Way “That it is the peculiar quality of the human Understanding, that Example Should correct no man. The Blunders of the Fathers are lost to their Children, and every Generation must commit its own.[”]4

I have never Sacrificed my Judgment to Kings, Ministers, nor People; and I never will. When either Shall See as I do, I Shall rejoice in their Protection Aid and honour: but I See no prospect that either will ever think as I do; and therefore I Shall never be a favourite with either. I do not desire to be.

323

But I Sincerely wish, and devoutly pray, that a hundred Years of civil Wars, may not be the Portion of all Europe, for the want of a little Attention to the true Elements of the Science of Government.

With Sentiments; moral Sentiments, which are, and must be eternal, I am your friend

John Adams

RC (MHi:Waterston Coll.); internal address: “Doctor Price, Hackney.”; docketed by JA: “Letter to Dr Price” and “John Adams / letter to / Dr Price.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 115.

1.

Whig Benjamin Hoadly (1676–1761), bishop of Winchester, criticized the political idea of hereditary rule in his work The Original and Institution of Civil Government Discuss’d, London, 1710 (vol. 2:287; DNB ).

2.

JA referred to the major noble families involved in the French Wars of Religion that raged between Roman Catholics and Huguenots from 1562 to 1598. For his reflections on the conflict’s legacy, see John Adams’ Discourses on Davila, 28 April 1790 – 27 April 1791, Editorial Note, below.

3.

Athenian youths Harmodius and Aristogiton tried and failed to assassinate the tyrant Hippias in 514 B.C. Executed for treason, they were publicly restored as martyrs of democracy ( Oxford Classical Dicy. ).

4.

JA loosely translated several concluding lines from Frederick II, History of the Seven Years’ War, which was printed in the third book of his Oeuvres Posthumes, Berlin, 1788. All fifteen volumes are in JA’s library at MB and contain significant annotations (The Correspondence of Richard Price, ed. W. Bernard Peach and D. O. Thomas, 3 vols., Durham, N.C., 1983–1994, 3:283; Catalogue of JA’s Library ).