Papers of John Adams, volume 20
a
th:1789
I have been so long accustomed to regard all your opinions upon
goverment with reverence, that I was disposed upon reading your last letter,1 to suspend my belief in republican Systems of
political happiness; but a little reflection led me again to adopt them, and upon this
single principle, that they have Never had a fair tryal.
Let us try what the influence of general science & religion diffused in early life,
will have upon our citizens. Let us try the effect of banishing the latin & greek
languages from our country. They consume the flower of human life—and by enabling us to
read agreeable histories of ancient crimes, Often lead us to imitate or to tollerate
them. Hitherto the factions have been fewer, & less violent in America since the
year 1776 than in many monarchies in the same number of years, under less irritating,
and dividing circumstances. Passions which in Europe would have vented themselves in
war, here discharged themselves only in newspaper scurrility, or in inflammatory
resolves, or addresses.— One thing further, my profession has taught me, Viz: that
political passions produce fewer diseases in a republic than in a monarchy.—
Disappointed ambition in Sweden and in Italy has produced sudden death from colics,
& apoplexies,— In america, it has scarcely of late
years produced a single hypocondriac disorder. In time, I believe the effects of the
political passions upon health & life will be still less perceptable in our country.
I think likewise our republican form of government, has already softned the religious
passions. we have less bigottry than formerly—and while there is no court, nor monarch,
no mode of worship will be preferred from interested considerations. Do you not think it
will be better to raise our people to a pure & free goverment by good education,
than to sink to their present vulgar habits by accommadating a goverment to them? Much
has been done already to enlighten our 29 citizens—but much
more may be done.— What do you think of a federal University, & of English free Schools in every township in the United
States?—2
I find we think more alike in your last letter upon a certain subject, than we did in your first.— I have a right to believe that the residence of congress in new York has always been an object of more importance in the eyes of many people, than the adoption or establishment of the federal Goverment.—
Many pious people wish the name of the supreme Being had been
introduced Somewhere in the new constitution. Perhaps an acknowledgement may be made of
his Goodness, or of his providence in the proposed amendments.— In all enterprizes,
& parties, I believe the praying, are better Allies,
than the fighting part of communities.—
I am Dear Sir with great regard / Your affectionate and / steady friend
nRush
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Dr Rush June 15 /
ansd 19. 1789.”
Of 9 June, above.
Rush’s essay “To Friends of the Federal Government: A Plan for a
Federal University” was published under the pseudonym “Citizen of Pennsylvania” in the
Philadelphia Federal Gazette, 29 Oct. 1788. Rush’s
proposed curriculum included government, history, manufacturing, commerce, math,
science, English, French, and German (Rush, Letters
,
1:491–495).
I Returned yesterday from attending the Genl Assembly, the great matters on which the ins.
& outs differ were bro’t on. we lost the Convention by 11 Votes. The Repeal of the
Tender by 9. on the whole we gain a little. but our progress is so slow that we shall
never arive at our wish’d for point except something like Mr
Bensons motion in Congress, could be obtained.1 it was usual for us to adjorn ’till August, but
no such motion was made. consiquently the Assembly will not meet ’till October (except
calld by Warrant.) in August the Lower house are Re:chosen. we shall do our utmost to
make a Change to our wishes, but have no great prospects. The oposition which consists
of the Debtors, with the midling & Lower Classes of Farmers continue firm in their
oposition. and I am afraid will so Continue Their Leaders keep up a Correspondence with
some of the Antifederal Members of Congress by which they are encouraged to stand 30 out. our situation is Difficult & verry
disagreable and what further steps to take we know not. wish for your advice &
assistance. I think it was a great oversight in not putting the old Impost Bill in
motion the first moment Congress was organized, in that case no time would have been
lost, and every one would have been fully heard with patience.2
From the forme of the Address used by The House of Representatives
of the U. States to the President, one would think that the House was composed of a
Majority of Quakers, and should we have no occasion to Talk to any Bodys of Men in the
old World, we might make out pretty well. but when the Respectable Republicks of America
determin that no Title shall be affixed to their Head, it will be looked upon as a piece
of Singularity & oddity. I hear President Manning is just arived shall call on him
before I Close this as I dont mean to be troublesome by the frequency of my Letters.3 By him I learn that no plan seems to be
agreed on, that on the whole we must be endur’d with that most Excellent Virtue Charity Patience; and let Time bring us to that period
that shall deliver us out of the hands of unjust men.
Continue to be mindful of us, and Believe me to be with the greatest Esteeme Your Excellency’ Most Obedient Servant
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Governor Bowen / July June 16. ansd 26. / 1789.”
The Rhode Island legislature met from 8 to 13 June. It passed an
embargo on grain and approved exemptions to that act in cases of hardship, but the
proposal to repeal the state’s tender act lost by seven votes. An impost bill that
called for a 30 percent tax on all imports was referred to the next session. More
significantly, the proposal for another ratification convention failed. New York
representative Egbert Benson introduced a congressional resolution on 1 June
recommending that the Rhode Island legislature call for a convention. The House
considered the motion on 5 June but, led by Virginia representative Alexander White,
decided against it (Records of the State of Rhode Island and
Providence Plantations in New England, ed. John Russell Bartlett, 10 vols.,
1856–1865, 10:332, 334–335; Newport Herald, 18 June;
AFC
, 9:339;
Doc. Hist.
Ratif. Const.
, 25:527, 531).
In 1781 the Continental Congress approved a 5 percent tax on all
imports despite the refusal of delegates from Rhode Island to support the motion. By
1786 Rhode Island was in favor of a federal impost, but New York defeated it (vol.
14:139, 140; Ferguson, Power of the
Purse
, p. 242).
Rev. James Manning (1738–1791), Princeton 1762, served as Rhode
Island’s delegate to the Continental Congress in 1786 and was pastor of the First
Baptist Church in Providence, R.I., from 1771 to 1791. An ardent Federalist, he
attended the Massachusetts ratification convention, and, in Aug. 1789, he chaired the
committee that drafted Providence residents’ petition to Congress seeking exemption
from foreign duties (
Doc. Hist. Ratif. Const.
, 7:1532; 24:42,
314–315).