Papers of John Adams, volume 20

To John Adams from Henry Marchant, 18 January 1790 Marchant, Henry Adams, John
From Henry Marchant
East Greenwich State of Rhode Island &c Jany: 18th. 1790 Respected Sir,

We may at Length congratulate each other on well founded Expectations of a speedy Adoption of the Constitution by this State. Agreably to the Information in my last, Our Genl. Assembly sat at Providence the last Week.1 The Opposers were to a Man upon the Ground except one sick. The Town of Warwick having four Members, had heretofore a heavy Majority against Us, and had instructed against a Convention— But on the Day on which the Assembly was to set, rallied Their Town to the largest Town meeting ever known, having upward of two hundred Votes in, but were beat by a Majority of Eleven in Favour of Instructions for a Convention— We brought on the Question in the lower House of Assembly for a Convention last Fryday, the very Day on which the Indulgence granted by Congress expired— After a Debate of four Hours, the Question was taken, and carried by five Majority— The upper House immediately took up 218 the Subject— This was the old House, and Our Hopes were faint— On Saturday They nonconcured with Our Vote by one Majority,—and sent Us a Bill for calling Town meetings again to take Their Sense and Instructions— The lower House immediately nonconcured, and sent up another Bill in nearly the same Form as Our first, lengthening the Time one Week for Election of Delegates:— In the mean Time every Exertion was making with the Members— However at ten o’Clock in the Evening They nonconcured with Our second Bill and adjourned to the next morning. Yesterday, being the Sabbath, without sending down the nonconcurence— In the Morning They sent it down to Us, with another Bill, for calling upon the Towns for Instructions— We nonconcured with this, and once more (You will smile) sent Them the Substance of Our former Bills, varying again the Time for appointing Delegates and the setting of the Convention— One of the Members of the upper House now absenting Himself, The Question being called, Their was a Tie, and the Governor turned the Vote, for a Convention—

We were happy to find that many of Our Opposers appeared very happy the disagreable Business was over—many promised They would give no further Opposition:—not the least Timper was shewn—

The Govr. is requested to forward the Proceedings to the President of the United States, with a Request that the Indulgence before granted may be continued, for such Time as Congress shall think proper— The Election of Delegates for a Convention is fixed to the second Monday of February; and the Meeting of the Convention to the first Monday of March— As I have not a reasonable Doubt, but the Constitution will be adopted, and I have never held up any Thing to Congress, but what the Event has justified—I must sincerely wish Congress will gratify Our Wishes—And as some Vessells have sailed since the fifteenth of March for some of the United States and others will sail before such further Indulgence may be granted, I must further wish, that in granting this, They will add, that such Tunnage and Duties as may be paid by Our Vessells, other than are paid by Subjects of the United States may be returned— All this is granting no further than was granted to North Carolina upon Their having appointed a Convention, and under the Expectation of an Adoption of the Constitution— I am confident this Indulgence will give Us at least ten Votes in Our Convention; and have a Tendency to reconcile hundreds of Our People—

I must be supposed to have a tollerable Idea of the Dispositions of Our Citizens.— Few have had greater Opportunities of obtaining 219 220 such Knowledge— I have not hesitated to give a decided Opinion that Congress would meet Us, with every cordial Mark of Approbation; and almost pledged myself for Success in Our Application— Be so kind Sir, as to present my Respects to the President, and to the Gentlemen of my Acquaintance—And If I have Your own favourable Sentiments of this Request, inform Them, that a steady and arduous Friend in this Business begs Their Attention to, and hearty Concurrence in, this Soliscitation

With every Sentiment of Regard I am, / Your most devoted / Friend & Servant

Hy. Marchant

NB—

private

There is some Reason to presume that Mr. H——l and Mr. B——d of this State have made some Interest for the Plan of D——t J——e The latter under the Friendship of Judge L——d of T——n now in Congress— If Incouragement to either, should be early given It may become a delicate Matter afterwards to do what might be most wished—2

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “His Excellency / John Adams Esqr. / Vice President of the / United States &c / New York”; internal address: “His Excellency John Adams Esqr. / Vice President &c”; endorsed: “Mr Marchant / Jan. 18. 1790 / ansd March 20.”

1.

Eyeing the 15 Jan. deadline for exemption from foreign tonnage duties, the R.I. General Assembly met in Providence on 11 January. Six days later it called for a new session of the ratification convention on 1 March and asked Gov. John Collins to appeal to Congress for a renewal of the exemption ( Doc. Hist. Ratif. Const. , 25:665–667). Congress’ next step was to draft the Rhode Island trade bill, for which see JA’s letter of 19 May to William Ellery, and note 2, below. For Rhode Island’s economic interdependence on the union, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 3, above.

2.

While Rhode Islanders deliberated over ratification, the creation of federal departments beckoned to early applicants like David Howell and William Bradford. Both Howell (1747–1824), Princeton 1766, and Bradford (1729–1808) were lawyers and Federalists who sought the aid of Massachusetts representative George Leonard (1729–1819), Harvard 1748, of Taunton, in soliciting a district judgeship. They were unsuccessful, and Marchant prevailed in gaining the post ( Doc. Hist. Ratif. Const. , 24:312, 314, 315; Biog. Dir. Cong. ).

To John Adams from Thomas McKean, 20 January 1790 McKean, Thomas Adams, John
From Thomas McKean
Sir, Philadelphia January 20th. 1790.

This will be handed to you by Mr; Francis Bailey, printer of the Freemans Journal in this city. I esteem him as an intelligent, ingenious & honest man. He has lately invented a simple method of making ornaments, devices and even types for securities, certificates and other public papers, which cannot possibly be counterfeited.1

221

As soon as his invention shall be made known, it can be used by any printer, and no patent could secure him much benefit from it: He therefore hopes for employment from Congress in the line of his business so long as he may deserve it, as the only reward for his discovery. With this view he goes to New-York, and requests me to do him the honor of introducing him to you, and solliciting your patronage. Your countenance and recommendation will oblidge an industrious & worthy character.

Be pleased to make my compliments acceptable to Mrs; Adams, Colo: & Mrs; Smith, and permit me to subscribe myself, what with great sincerity I am, / Sir, Your most obedient humble servant

Tho M:Kean

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams Esquire.—”

1.

Francis Bailey (ca. 1735–1815), former printer for the Continental Congress and the state of Pennsylvania, had published the Philadelphia Freeman’s Journal since 1781. Bailey developed a form of printing type that he claimed could not be counterfeited “by the most ingenious Artists in sculpture, or by any other means.” Bailey petitioned both houses of Congress for the exclusive use of his invention, garnering prominent supporters like Pennsylvania senator Robert Morris and George Duffield, pastor of Philadelphia’s Third Presbyterian Church. On 20 Jan. 1790 Duffield wrote to JA (Adams Papers), recommending Bailey as “a man of great integrity; & I think, I may safely say, universally esteemed by his Acquaintance for his honesty & uprightness.”

From 2 to 26 Feb., a House of Representatives committee considered Bailey’s petition and passed a bill in support of it. It was sent to the Senate on 2 March, where it foundered, likely because of Alexander Hamilton’s negative report on the efficacy of Bailey’s invention. On 4 March the Senate opted to postpone discussion of Bailey’s request until a “bill to promote the progress of useful arts shall be taken into consideration,” for which see Richard Cranch’s 22 Jan. letter, and note 1, below (Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 5:89–90; AFC , 1:216; Hamilton, Papers , 6:277–278; Annals of Congress , 1st Cong., 1st sess., p. 988).