Papers of John Adams, volume 20

To John Adams from James Sullivan, 2 October 1789 Sullivan, James Adams, John
From James Sullivan
Sir Boston 2d October 1789

I have to aknowledge the honor of receiving yours of the 17th & 21st. instant

In my Letter of the 18th of agust, I suggested to your consideration, the idea of encreasing the circulating medium of the united states, by some kind of paper Credit. I hinted that I beleived, the duties, and Impost, Established, would call for more cash than is in circulation within the union, and that there was no Instance in any Country where one half of their medium passes through the public Treasury annually. in your obliging answer, you reply, that the money, as soon as received into the Treasury, will be again paid to the creditors of Government, and so be passed immediately into circulation. And that the states are destitute of that Credit which is necessary to the support of a paper Currency. these positions may be both True, but I am by no means convinced of the certainty of the one last mentioned, provideded the Government is administred with firmness moderation and prudence.

I have been in the Country upon business where money would have appeared if there had been any, and do assure you, that since my first introduction into the world, I never new so much complaint, or saw so much foundation for complaining. Our Common people have more money than the Peasants of other Countries, but you know Sir, that their Lenders in the revolution engaged that they should have more. their habits of expenditures cannot be suddenly changed without great convulsions, and perhaps civil wars. it is no easy task to learn to bear poverty with patience. but I only mean this as an apology for having troubled you on the subject. and urge the matter no further: Time decides upon all things.

174

I have read with great pleasure yours of the 21st., wherein you mention with great strength of expression, your determination to urge with integrity, those political principles which tend to give Government a proper balance, and consequently to secure to the people, those rights, for which all good Governments are instituted. I beleive the people are too sensible of your Services to treat you ill, and that your fellow Citizens are too much enlightned to persecute a Real friend. if you are ever injured it will be by those, who from a real regard to the principles of Despotism abhor every one who took an Active part in the late revolution, or by them who have no idea of Government, but as it affords them wealth and Emolument. these will Court you while you are in power to serve them, but the moment your old friends, and the People at large shall be induced to neglect you, these men will fatten on the triumph.

I might complain of being used not so well as I think I had a right to Expect; I engaged early in defence of my Countrys freedom, God knows it was on the purest, and most disinterested Principles. I spent the prime of my life in Legislative, and Judicial Capacities with no Emolument but paper money. I have, while there, been threatned with Halters, Gaols, &c. by men who are now in the warm Embraces of Government.1 when the People by an unhappy combination of circumstances were exceedingly oppressed, and a number of them run mad, I took those healing Measures on our small scale, which Necker is taking in the great world: and Established without shedding blood by the civil arm, peace, and Tranquility. for I believe, that in all civil commotions, the less blood there is shed by the civil Authority, the more lasting the Succeeding peace will be. when the Constitution of the united states was submitted to the Consideration of the people, notwithstanding the Enthusiastic fervour which then reigned, I was honest enough to express my wishes for such amendments as I considered Essentially necessary to guard those rights which my Countrymen have bled to preserve, and for no other amendmends than what congress have agreed to. but for this, I find myself neglected by the national Government. as I do not want an office for the Emolument of it, so I can make myself very happy with the Esteem and Love of the People in private life.

Your ideas of an equipoise of powers in civil Government are always entertaining, and Instructive to me: and I am generally cautious of expressing Opinions to one, on whom the Learned world looks with so much respect as they do on you, but out of respect to you, I will venture to offer a few observations.

175

All writers upon civil Government agree, that there naturally exists three powers, which in a free Government can never be united in one man, or in one body of men: that such a Constitution as these writers speak of ever existed, compleat in all its parts I have yet to learn. the Europeans pretend that their orders of nobility are aristocratic bodys forming one balance, of the three powers, but it appears to me, that the Nobility in every Kingdom in Europe are an Artificial, and not a Natural branch of Government, and that the People at Large, while they suffer much by, derive no other benefit from them, than what arises from the wars between them and the soveregn power: without any regard in Either for the rights of the people.

When the united states declared themselves Independent, they became seperate sovereignties: and according to Montesque, and other writers, the people were both Sovereign, and subjects. their Magitratrates were their ministers to Execute the Laws, while the body of the People were the supreme Legislatures.

Upon the adoption of the General Government, a part of this Sovereignty was Yeilded, but the several states yet possess a great Share of that Sovereignty, over the subjects, and property they held before

In the departments of the General Government I cannot find any provision expressly made for the three great powers so much talked of. The President under certain advisory checks, holds the Executive Power; the senate, and House, under the Check of the Presidents negative hold the Legislative Authority, the senate is said to be a substitute for an aristocratic body, but while the two Houses of the Legislature, in the several states choose the senators, they are still but the representatives of the People, though introduced by a sort of double refinement in election.

An aristocracy, as I conceive of it, Must be independent both of sovereign and People, hence it follows that a Democracy cannot admit the appearance of an Aristocratic body. when I say an Aristocracy is independent of the Sovereign and the People, I mean that they are so, as to their future Existance and duration.

The Supreme Judicial holds that office during Good behaviour, which is a Tenure quite incompatible with the Ideas of an Aristocracy, but this Tenure however pompous it may Sound, when coolly examined will be found to be no more than a Tenency at will. and what is worse it depends upon the Legislative branch for existance. though the Judges are appointed by the supreme Executive, during good behaviour, and their Salaries irrevocably fixed by the 176 Legislature, yet they may be impeached by the House, and tryed and removed by the Senate. therefore should there ever be a Time, when the President, House and Senate, shall agree upon a Law for changing the Constitution, and the Judges shall refuse to carry it into Execution, they may be removed by one branch of the Legislative power, and their Seats filled with men who will Act in consort with the other powers of state. then where is the Conterpoise which is so much talked of? it may be answered that the Judges will have integrity and firmness Enough to do right. that no doubt is the case with the Present Bench, nor is their Danger of a Violation of the Constitution in the Present age. but these observations if they have any weight, may be used to prove all Constitutional checks, and balances to be unnecessary.

The Method taken by all the Governments that I know any thing about to support themselves, and counterpoise their systems, is to rob the People of their wealth, their Liberty, and their understanding, and to press them down with standing Armies, and all this under pretence of defending them from a foreign power, which could not make them more unhappy, even by a Conquest. but this can never be the case in America; because the People have got a habit of understanding their own Interest, and cannot loose the use of arms.

But I am by no means aware, that the insufficiency of the Judicial, to counterpoise the other powers of Government in the plan adopted by the People of the united States, can ever become dangerous. the constitution has made as I conceive full provision in this case. the Existance of the states with uncontroulable, and Sovereign powers in some things, is preserved and guarentied by the General Government. and are necessary to the Election of Presidt. Vice President, and Senators, the Legislature of each hath certain honors, rights, and priviledges which they will Jealously defend, and their very Existance as Soveregn states depends upon the preservation of the balance of the New general Government. to these I look as the most powerful checks, and contemplate them as possessing all the powers Necessary both to Counterpoise the Union, and to defend the people against the Encroachments which may in future ages be attempted upon their Liberty.

This species of balance may no doubt be attended with all the evils which You mention as flowing from the Encampment of great men, in the various parts of the Continent, but there can be no way to prevent it, unless by the mode of European Governments, that is 177 to rob the people of the power of acting at all. for Nature has irrevocably established it, that where man has the power of doing good, he has the power of doing evil, You must therefore rob the people of the power of free agency, or they may do wrong.

In a Government where the People have any share of freedom, and possess any quantity of property, the beam of balance will be alway vibrating, and will Turn more, or less according to the agitation of the Surrounding Atmosphere, or other accidents. this flows forever from the imperfection of man, and must for the sake of the rights of human Nature, be born in the political, as we bear storms, and Tempests, in the Natural world

The dependence I have for Peace and good order, is in the wise administration of all our Governments, and in the intelligence and goodness of my Countrymen. they possess property, and hope for more, and have given full Evidence of their wishing for a Government to protect them in the enjoyment of it. they have indeed unhappily fallen into such mistakes and irregularities, as will Essentially injure them, but I beleive their habits are quite averse to the frequent repetition of them.

should the americans ever become ignorant, poor, and undisciplined, a strong state may be erected on the ruins of freedom, but I beleive they never will. should such a Government succeed, it will wan voluptuous, Arrogant, arbitrary, and cruel, and finally like the Roman, & other Empires will die of wounds received from its own hands.

should there ever be an unhappy Controversy between the General Government, and the particular states, a division of the whole into two or more states will be the probable Consequence, when the northern states will contend still for freedom. but how Long they will hold a free Constitution, the Century in which the Controversy shall take place may determine.

At present we can be in no danger while the General Government is administred with Impartiality; moderation, and Prudence. an attempt to alter the Constitution or to infringe the Rights of the particular states, would undoubtedly kindle a fire to be quenched only with blood.

I do not give you the trouble of reading this, supposing you would be instructed by it. or that any thing I can write will be entaining to you: but I wish you to beleeive that I am fully convinced, that the happiness of a people, depends much upon the principles of the Government under which they Live, and that I am firmly of opinion, 178 that the United Independence of America must be preserved by moderation, Prudence, & Virtue, as certainly as it was acquired by Wisdom, Valour and firmness.

I have the honor to be / with sentiments of the highest / respect your most obedient / and most Humble Servt

Ja Sullivan

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams Esqr.”

1.

Sullivan, a longtime supporter of John Hancock, fiercely opposed the rise of James Bowdoin, claiming that he headed a “party in this commonwealth composed of the seekers of emoluments” and “old anti-revolutionists.” JA did not reply to this letter, and Sullivan did not resume their correspondence until 23 April 1795. In the interim, JA remained wary of his motives, sternly warning JQA that Sullivan was “a Savage, whose trea[chery] I would advise you to avoid like a Pestilence. . . . A more false and faithless Character is Scarcely to be found” ( AFC , 9:113; Sibley’s Harvard Graduates , 15:311).

From John Adams to Thomas Brand Hollis, 28 October 1789 Adams, John Hollis, Thomas Brand
To Thomas Brand Hollis
Dear Sir, Boston, October 28, 1789.

It was not till the last evening that I had the pleasure of your favor, with the pamphlets. They were sent to New-York, but had not arrived when I left it. Mrs. A. has sent the letter back to me.1 Accept of my thanks for the kindness.

This town has been wholly employed in civilities to the president for some days, and greater demonstrations of confidence and affection are not, cannot be given, in your quarter of the globe to their adored crowned heads.2

I wrote to you, my dear friend, a year ago, by a vessel which was lost at sea, and have been much mortified that I have not been able to write to you oftener.3 But we are men of business here, whether we will or no; and so many things that give us only troble crowd in upon us, that we have little time left for those which would afford us pleasure.

My country has assigned me a station, which requires constant attention and painful labor: but I shall go through it with cheerfulness, provided my health can be preserved in it. There is a satisfaction in living with our beloved chief, and so many of our venerable patriots, that no other country, and no other office in this country, could afford me.

What is your opinion of the struggle in France? Will it terminate happily? Will they be able to form a constitution? You know that in my political creed, the word liberty is not the thing; nor is resentment, revenge, and rage, a constitution, nor the means of obtaining one. Revolutions perhaps can never be effected without them: but 179 men should always be careful to distinguish an unfortunate concomitant of the means from the means themselves: and especially not to mistake the means for the end.

My most cordial regards to all our friends, and believe me to be ever yours,

John Adams.

MS not found. Printed from Disney, Memoirs , p. 35–36; internal address: “Thomas Brand-Hollis, esq.”

1.

Hollis’ letter was of 6 June, above, which AA forwarded on 20 October. JA visited Braintree from 12 Oct. to late November, returning to New York by 1 Dec. ( AFC , 8:427, 464; Washington, Diaries , 5:503).

2.

George Washington’s intent was to tour New England and thereby “acquire knowledge of the face of the Country the growth and Agriculture there of and the temper and disposition of the Inhabitants towards the new government.” He left New York on 15 Oct. and reached Boston nine days later. A large procession—comprising Massachusetts officials, merchants, and clergy—greeted the president. Newpapers described in detail the banners, cheering, and singing that accompanied the city’s welcome reception for Washington. JA declined an invitation to travel with the president, but he joined Washington’s party in Boston, where they dined in a large company and visited Harvard College. JA reported that the “charming” Virginian enjoyed a “cordial and Splendid reception,” and that he believed the tour would “do much public good.” Pausing at Newburyport, Washington heard JQA’s 4 Nov. address, which hailed the president as “the friend, the benefactor, the father of his Country.”

Washington’s first public tour took in nearly sixty towns and stretched to Maine. Notably, he omitted Rhode Island, which had yet to join the union. In his diary, Washington recorded his impressions of people, agriculture, and manufacturing. Looking over the houses and farms that dotted Massachusetts, Mount Vernon’s owner observed that there was “a great equality in the People of this State—Few or no oppulent Men and no poor.” Suffering from a cold and an inflammation in his left eye, Washington moved quickly through New Hampshire and Maine, drawing his first excursion to New England to a close by early November. He turned south at Portsmouth, N.H., and headed for New York, reaching the city on 13 November. For a map of his tour, see Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 4:200–201 (Washington, Diaries , 5:453, 460–497; AFC , 8:421, 425, 432, 445–446, 447; Boston Herald of Freedom, 27 Oct.; Newburyport Essex Journal, 4 Nov.; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 4:163).

3.

Not found.