Papers of John Adams, volume 20

To John Adams from James Searle, 10 June 1789 Searle, James Adams, John
From James Searle
Dear Sir Philadelphia 10th. June 1789.

I was duely favoured with your obliging letter of the 15th. of last Month and feel myself not a little gratified with the renewal of a correspondence with Mr. Adams, a friend for whom I feel a most exalted respect and affection.—1

When I took the liberty to write to you last I mentioned my happy situation in business, and my independent feelings, but I hope I have not been misunderstood by Mr. Adams in that declaration, or that I mean’t that Surly haughty English independence that many make it their boast to feel; On the contrary Sir I am clearly in sentimt. with Yorick that we are all (or ought to be) Brothers in this mutable State, and depend much upon each other for Acts of Kindness and Brotherly love, Indeed it is very commode for me to think so at present, because I am going to claim the honour of being your relation in his sense of the word, and in consequence to ask a Brotherly peice of Kindness from you, which I persuade myself you will not with-hold from me.

To come to the point, I have now laying before our Council in this State An Account and a Claim which I have against the State for my Agency & Expences in endeavouring to effect a Loan for the State, and the Comptroller general of the state thro’ whose office my Accts. must first pass, & who is my friend,2 tells me that he is convinced a few lines from you to me expressive of your opinion that I took the most effectual measures on my arrival in Holland to obtain the Aforesaid loan, and that the then Situation of Affairs in Holland would not admit of my obtaining the loan, woud greatly facilitate the Settlement of my claim— Now my Dear Sir as I did myself the honour to consult you agreable to the orders I had received from the 15 Council before I left America, in the early Stages of that business in Holland, and as you will no doubt recollect the difficultys that attended obtaining loans at that time (the Winter of 80 & Spring & Summer 81.) I humbly request you woud take the trouble at a leisure moment of writing me a few lines on this Subject, and perhaps you may so far gratify me as to give it as your opinion that I did not dishonour the State I represented or neglect their Interests in my endeavours to procure the Loan.3

I hope you will pardon the liberty I am now taking wch. I coud only prevail on myself to do, as I am fully convinced of your goodness & freindly disposition to me.

I have the honour to be with every Sentiment of respect / Dr. Sir / Your most Obliged & Obed Servt.

James Searle

RC (Adams Papers).

1.

See vol. 19:449–450, 451–452.

2.

John Nicholson (1757–1800), a land speculator from Chambersburg, served as Pennsylvania’s comptroller general from 1782 to 1794 ( ANB ).

3.

Searle arrived in Paris in Sept. 1780, planning to arrange a loan for Pennsylvania. Failing in his efforts with several French firms, Searle traveled to the Netherlands, where he met JA. Searle’s quest was unsuccessful there as well, but he made a positive impression on JA, who observed: “Mr. Searle’s Conversation is a Cordial to me. He gives a charming sanguine Representation of our Affairs, such as I am very well disposed to believe, and such as I should give myself, if interrogated, according to the best of my Knowledge” (vols. 9:453, 10:384).

To John Adams from James Sullivan, 10 June 1789 Sullivan, James Adams, John
From James Sullivan
Sir Boston 10th June 1789

The Communicating our Sentiments to men in power, when done with the respect due to their characters, and without a troublesome intrusion, is at all times a mark of Veneration and esteem. upon these ideas I Venture to address a letter to the Vice President of the United states, and which he will read, when his leisure will admit a moment of heedless employment.

I am very deeply impressed with the disagreeable situation of N Carolina, Rhode Island, and Vermont. though I am very sensible that your Situation and ability have placed you far beyond the reach of my suggesting any thing new to you upon the subject, yet I wish to be indulged one word.

great expectation of happiness and prosperity are raised upon the general Government. these are still heightned by the idea of the Characters who have the administration of it. but the system, perfect as it is, or may be, or the Governors, however wise, or prudent, 16 cannot afford to man, that perfect ease and enjoyment, which his fond hopes are reaching after, and which the Wisdom of heaven hath decreed he cannot possess.

I beleive we shall be as happy as any nation in the world, but not as happy as we expect to be: Government as Doctor Price says, being but the choice of evils.1

When our officers have a naked competency, and our national Debt creates Either an imaginary, or a real burthen, our people may become in some measure uneasy. the raising a revenue by Impost, is clearly the best Mode in the world; but while it was thought a virtue to prevent the British revenue raised on the Colonies, our Merchants contracted habits which Interest, or Necessity may suffer some of them to indulge, and it would be no wonder that a partial uneasiness, or possibly a limitted disaffection to a young Government, should take place for awhile. if any thing of this kind should happen, and the States above mentioned should remain unconnected with the confederated republic, they will become asylums for fugitives from Justice, and increase their number by lessening the risque of offending; and greatly serve to promote the Subversion of the Revenue and other Laws.

I could point out many Mischiefs arising from this source, and you might call them imaginary ones. but if they might really exist, it would be more useful to prescribe a remedy, but this I cannot pretend to. and yet as I dread a civil contest, and am very averse to that kind of war, which calls for halters and axes, I beg leave to mention the necessity of an Early attempt by Congress, to unite all the States; and that before any interdiction of commerce with those which are delinquent Congress should address the Legislatures of those States with Solicitude on the subject, point out to them their unfortunate Situation, and the necessity which the Republic is under of taking decided measures to bring them under the general Government, and protection. let me add, the idea of a Letter for this purpose being Signed by the President at the request of Congress. should this fail, perhaps the giving Individuals who shall take the oath of Alegiance, the priviledge of Citizens, may weaken the force, and distract the Councils of the opposition, and bring on a conviction of the necessity of a union.

however small these observations may appear to you, yet you will suffer the goodness of my intentions to apologize for them; for I assure you that I dread a delay in this important business— because I 17 beleive, that soon after the Revenue Laws, and the restrictions on trade shall begin to opperate a present benefit will arise which may strengthen the opposition.

The People of the Eastern part of this state where I once was conversant are uneasy at having no port of delivery, or of Entry, Eastward of Portland. the shore is two hundred miles long, and they will suffer great inconvenience by being obliged to Enter at Portland, my Friends that way have urged me to write you on the subject expressing their confidence in your goodness.2

I am Sir with the highest / sentiments of respect your most / obedient Humble Servant

James Sullivan

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams.”

1.

“The choice generally offered us is ‘of two evils to take the least.’ We chuse the restraint of civil government, because a less evil than anarchy” (Richard Price, Observations on the Importance of the American Revolution, London, 1784, p. 17).

2.

After the first draft of the 8 May collection bill was tabled in the House of Representatives, Pennsylvania congressman Thomas Fitzsimons introduced a second bill on 27 May. Debate centered on the establishment of ports of entry and delivery. On 2 June representatives agreed that Portland was one of the Massachusetts ports. A day later, the House added eight more ports, all in the region of present-day Maine. Rather than amend the 27 May bill, Massachusetts representative Benjamin Goodhue presented the House with a new bill on 29 June, later known as the Collection Act. Passed on 31 July, this legislation allotted twenty ports to Massachusetts, including six northeast of Portland: Bath, Wiscasset, Penobscot, Frenchman Bay, Machias, and Passamaquoddy.

As part of the establishment of a federal system of revenue, the Collection Act divided the states into districts and established ports in all states save North Carolina and Rhode Island, which were treated as foreign states owing to their pending ratification of the Constitution. Further, the act summarized the duties of collectors, naval officers, and inspectors. Collectors were responsible for examining ships’ manifests, estimating and collecting duties for the U.S. Treasury, basic record-keeping, monitoring fraud, and appointing inspectors. They were entitled to fees of $1.50 to $2.50 on every ship that entered or cleared the port, of 20 to 40 cents each for every permit or certificate they issued, and at nine of the largest ports, of one half of a percent of all money collected and sent to the U.S. Treasury. By 1792, the income garnered from customs yielded over 90 percent of the federal revenue. JA received numerous patronage requests for new posts created by the Collection Act; see, for example, Stephen Hall’s letter of 15 Aug. 1789, below ( First Fed. Cong. , 1:102; 3:73, 100, 813, 814; Annals of Congress , 1st Cong., 1st sess., 1:433, 434, 435; U.S. Statutes at Large , 1:29–49; Douglas A. Irwin and Richard Sylla, Founding Choices: American Economic Policy in the 1790s, Chicago, 2011, p. 101).