Papers of John Adams, volume 19

466 To John Adams from Jabez Bowen, 19 May 1789 Bowen, Jabez Adams, John
From Jabez Bowen
Sir, Providence May 19. 1789

On the 6th. of this Month was held our General Election for Officers for the Ensuing Year; they are nearly the same as the last, saving a few more Federal Charecters in the Lower-house.1

Their was Instructions from the Towns of Newport & Providence to their Deputies to use their Influence for a State Convention the Business was taken up, but we soon found Their was no probability of succeding, and by the particular desire of several of the Majority the motion was posponed to be taken up on the 4th Day of the Session which begins the 9th of June.2

At the Close of the week the Majority brot in a Bill for laying the same Impost on all Goods as Congress shall order, to be paid in the same Specie, and to be appropriated for the same purposes, as that raised by Congress. mankind would suppose by this that Rd. Island was preparing to come into the Union, but their is no such Idea at Bottom. it rather seems Calculated to lull Congress into a State of Indiffrence respecting our affairs and that we shall come in by & by.3

when we talk with the oposition about adopting the Constitution, they say that they are willing to call a Convention who shall be impowered to make such Amendments as shall be thot necessary; these amendments to be laid before Congress and if they will approve them then they will Ratify the Constitution. such is the Ideas of the people we have to Deal with. on the whole I am of opinion that the same principles of wild Democracy prevails among our officers and a Majority of the people as did in the Massachusetts in 87. &c 88 and that their is no probability of this States comming into the Union unless they percive that Congress will take some energetick steps to compell them to come in. when we come to be excluded from a Freetrade with the other States the situation of the seaport Towns must be verry distressing nearly similer to that of the Town of Boston, on the Port Bills takeing place. our Ideas of the matter is this to make a spirited and firm application on the Day appointed for the Gallery a State Convention agreable to the Recommendation of the Grand Convention, if we faile then for the Towns of Newport & Providence with such other Towns as will joyn to apply to Congress for Protection. if they grant it, that we Seceed from the Goverment under which we Live. and abide the Determination of Congress 467 concerning us, but we must be assured of the Protection of Congress before we take the last and desessive step.

Thus Sir I have given you a True & Faithfull state of our Political situation, and wish for your advise and direction how we shall conduct in this most difficult Crisis

I hope Sir you will not think me Troublesome in this address it proceeds from a Heart that has been deeply intrested in the great Revolution and who now wishes to participate in the Blessings of the Best Civil Constitution that Mankind has been ever Bless’d with.

with sentiments of the most sincear Esteeme I Remain Your Excellency Most Humb Servant

Jabez Bowen

RC (Adams Papers).

1.

See the 2 April Address from Rhode Island Federalists, and note 1, above.

2.

On 9 May the R.I. General Assembly postponed a motion for a state convention until the June session, and on 11 June the House of Deputies rejected a motion for it. On 19 Oct., at a series of Rhode Island town meetings, citizens instructed the House of Deputies to call a state convention, but that body defeated the motion on the 29th ( Doc. Hist. Ratif. Const. , 24:lxxii).

3.

During its May 1789 session, the R.I. General Assembly passed a new impost act, retaliating against the state’s commercial ostracization from the new federal government. The act stipulated that the “same Duties and Imposts” should “be levied and collected” in Rhode Island “as may be ordered to be levied and collected upon similar Goods, Wares and Merchandise, imported either by Land or Water” into the United States (Howard Kemble Stokes, Public and Private Finance: A History of the Finances of Rhode Island, 1636–1900, Providence, R.I., 1901, p. 232; Rhode Island. Session Laws, Newport, R.I., 1789, Evans, No. 22102).

To John Adams from William Smith, 19 May 1789 Smith, William Adams, John
From William Smith
Dear Sr. Boston. 19 May. 1789.

As the Revenue Act has past the House & it is probable may now be before the Senate, I will take the freedom to hint to you the uneasiness that prevails here respecting the duty of 5 Cents fixed on Molasses, without permitting a drawback on the Rum exported to foreign Markets.1 6 to 7000 Hhds of Rum are exported from this State annually to foreign ports, & the quantity is encreasing, as New Markets are constantly opening in different parts of Europe. at the present price it is shipt at of 1/6 & 1/7 Gallon it will make a Freight, but with the addition of 5 Cents per Gn. on Molasses it cannot be shipt to any part of Europe— it has been objected to a drawback, that it wou’d occasion many frauds. we have in this State had a drawback of the Excise on all the Rum exported & I believe very few frauds have taken place, the same checks of Bonds &c. may be provided, & 468 as the National Drawback will be on Rum exported only to foreign ports frauds may be more easily detected.— the general revenue will suffer very materially by so high a duty, either the importation of Molasses will cease & a very large property in Distill Houses &c be entirely ruin’d or a general agreement not to discountenance smugling will eventually take place. No part of the Union has been more zealous to promote the adoption of the New Governt. than the Importers & Distillers of this article. they have expected great assistance from the New. Govt. perhaps more than they had a right to. but if one of the first Acts, (instead of promoting their Interest, with the rest of the community) shou’d entirely ruin them, you must expect to hear loud complaints. it is conceiv’d that the Northern Distilleries are sacrific’d to encourage the Breweries of Pensylva.— If the object is to prevent the use of Rum & to mend the morals of the people the Duty is not high eno’. if the raising a revenue is the object, in my opinion two or three Cents on Molasses with a drawback on Rum exported to foreign Markets, will raise ten times the Sum that the propos’d Duty will. where every one is interest’d & thinks himself tax’d more than his proportion, it will be difficult to procure information of any breaches of the Acts— As I wish to see the first Acts of the Gen. Govt come into operation with the Consent of the People you will excuse my intruding on you my opinions—

We have had the pleasure of Mrs. Adams Company with us, to day on her way to Haverhill.—2

I am with much Respect / Yr. Most. H Sert

Wm. Smith.

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mr W. Smith / 19. May. Ansd. 27 / 1789.”

1.

On 8 April James Madison presented a resolution in the House of Representatives proposing duties on goods imported into the United States, including molasses, as part of what later became the Tariff Act of 4 July 1789. Over the next month the House deliberated over the duties attached to different articles, and a six-cent duty on molasses voted in on 14 April was repeatedly debated. On 12 May the House voted to change the molasses duty from 6 cents to 5 cents. After the Senate passed the bill with amendments on 11 June, the “Act for laying a duty on goods, wares, and merchandises, imported into the United States,” which included a duty on molasses of 2 1/2 cents per gallon, was approved on 4 July ( Annals of Congress , 1st Cong., 1st sess., p. 38–39, 46, 102, 106–108, 129–144, 349, 2183–2186). Massachusetts newspapers published accounts of the House disputes over the molasses duty; see, for example, the Boston Independent Chronicle, 23 April; Salem Mercury, 28 April, 12 May; and Worcester, Mass., American Herald, 8, 14 May. See also William Tudor’s 22 April letter, and note 2, above.

2.

AA was en route to stay with her sister Elizabeth Smith Shaw for one week in mid-May, when she visited her cousin William Smith, a Boston merchant ( AFC , 8:343, 358–359).