Papers of John Adams, volume 19

To John Adams from Samuel Allyne Otis, 31 January 1789 Otis, Samuel Allyne Adams, John
From Samuel Allyne Otis
Dear Sir New York Jany 31st 1789

Probably before this will reach you the election of Vice President will be determined, upon which I may venture to congratulate you Sir, as I hear of no Competition of any importance.

Mrs Adams & Col Smith can give you a more minute acct of public affairs & particularly of the dispositions of the people of this State, having good information from your friend Mr Jay and others, than it is in my power to communicate. It is however but too notorious that Mr Clintons interest is powerfully exerted to impede the new Government. The Legislature cannot agree upon the mode of chusing Senators, nor is it expected they will early be represented in the Senate.1

Five States only are represented in Congress altho I think it cannot be many days before we have seven & perhaps nine States. You are frequently enquired after & will be soon expected.2

When I did myself the honor to write you last I took the liberty to solicit your interest for the appointment to be Clerk of the Senate, And as I have encouragment from my friends of success, I hope you will excuse my reiterating the subject. R H Leee Esqr & R Izzard Esqr will as heretofore be much with you in politics, in the choice of men & adoption of measures; to those Gentlemen I am unknown; Could I obtain their voice I flatter myself in addition to my other friends it would give me success. If Sir you approve my views I should feel and at all times acknowledge the obligation if you would further them.3

But for the unprovoked malice of Mr H, I should have been appointed Naval Officer for the Port of Boston, The same influence prevented my election for Suffolk District. The Clerkship of either House is no object for a young man, but at my time, & in my circumstances, it would be important, being wholly out of business, & my commercial prospects at an end; However I must leave my pretensions to speak for themselves, & will not be burthensome with 378 importunity, And after compliments to the family & Connexions subscribe with great sincerity / Sir / Your most obedient & / Humble Servt

Sam. A. Otis

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Honble / Mr Adams”; endorsed: “Mr Otis Jan. 31. / recd Feb. Ansd 8. 1789.”

1.

For New York’s debate to ratify the U.S. Constitution, see John Jay’s 4 July 1788 letter, and note 1, above.

2.

The Continental Congress ceased operation between Nov. 1788 and March 1789. JA wrote to AA2 on 11 Nov. 1788 that he did not expect to see a quorum until the following February, and then it would be “merely to declare the old Government dissolved, and the new one in exercise” ( AFC , 8:305).

3.

Otis, AA’s cousin, was one of five candidates competing for the post of secretary of the Senate. His main competitor was Charles Thomson, who had served as secretary of the Continental Congress since 1774. There is no indication that JA made an appeal on behalf of Otis, or on behalf of any other candidate, to Virginia senator Richard Henry Lee or South Carolina senator Ralph Izard. But while Sylvanus Bourne was sent on 6 April 1789 to notify JA of his new role, Thomson was dispatched on a lengthier trip to Virginia to inform George Washington of his election to the presidency. In Thomson’s absence, the Senate on 8 April named Otis to the position, which he held until his death in 1814 ( AFC , 1:103; Biog. Dir. Cong. ; Charlene Bangs Bickford and Kenneth R. Bowling, Birth of the Nation: The First Federal Congress, 1789–1791, Washington, D.C., 1989, p. 17; U.S. Senate, Jour. , 1st Cong., 1st sess., p. 8–9, 10).

From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 8 February 1789 Adams, John Rush, Benjamin
To Benjamin Rush
My Dear Friend Braintree Feb. 8 1789

Your obliging favor of the 22d Ult I recd. last night.— I remember so much of the transactions, at the formation of the Pensilvania Constitution, that I wish you could save time enough from almost any other pursuit, to arrange your materials for an History of the Revolution in Pensilvania, to be published hereafter; at present perhaps it might not be prudent. The four respectable characters, who had much influence in the fabrication of your Constitution, Mr. Matlack Mr Cannon Mr Paine & Dr Young, should be analyzed and developed in a manner that would give offence.1 Let me give you the character of one of them, (Young) in a conversation which really passed in 1772 between Timothy Ruggles, & Royal Tyler.

Ruggles. That Tom Young, is a firebrand, an incendiary an eternal fisher in troubled waters. Boston will nev[er] be in peace while that fellow is in it. He is a scourge a pestilence, a judgement.

Tyler. come! come! dont abuse Dr Young; He is a necessary man in the town of Boston. He is in the city, what you are in the House of Reps.: a useful man.

Ruggles. useful for what? Tyler. I was yesterday in a watch makers shop, and look’d over his shoulder while he put a watch together: 379 The springs and wheels, were all clean, and in good order, every one in its place as far as I could see, but the watch would not go: the artist at length with his thu[mb] and forefinger groping in the dust, upon his shop board took up a little dirty pin, scarcely visible to my naked sight blew off the dust and screwed it into a certain part of the wheelwork, the watch then click’d in an instant and went very well.— This little dirty screw are you in the Legislature and Dr Young in the town of Boston. Here was a loud roar of Laughter at Ruggles’s expence; but his wit has seldom failed him as his power of face; with all the gravity of a Judge he replied. Ruggles. Since you are upon clock work, I’l tell you what you resemble, the Pendulum—eternaly vibrating from one side to the other; but I must do you the justice to say I never knew one swing so clear. the answer hit the character so exactly, that the tide of laughter was now turned the contrary way.2

We have had my dear sir, in all the States in the course of the late revolution, two many of these little Pins who have acquired the reputation of great wheels and main springs. How few in any age or country have been equal to it; in America, we should have been very excusable if we had found none; neither our Education our prospects or expectations led us to this frame of thinking. Ages of anarchy and distraction preceeded the formation of such characters as those of Lycurgus and Solon. And long study and laborious travel, with a single view to discover the best forms of government were scarcely sufficient for their purpose. An anxiety for the consequences of the form of government which I found planning for Pensilvania, induced me to throw out those thoughts on Government which were printed I believe by Dunlap in 1776, if you can find one of them you will oblige Me by sending it; I have not seen it these ten years, and have not been able to find one here since my return. I remember that you wrote a series of speculations in the Newspapers about the same time upon the same subject; as I thought them at the time both Spirited and ingenious, I wish to see them again. With the character of Mr Tench Coxe, I have had for some time, an agreeable acquaintance, but knew not that he had employ’d many of his thoughts about me, till I received your letter. I have not seen a Pensylvania paper since my return, nor did I know but from a paragraph or two extracted into the Boston papers that any thing had been written concerning me.

The character you give me of Mr McClay is very agreeable, and the more so because he is your Friend; his real character was little known here.

380

If it should be my destiny to have any share in the new government, you will be very sensible of the delicacy of my situation, and of the necessity of a more accurate discretion, than nature perhaps has afforded me. I shall be very happy in your correspondence, but you will readily agree, that it must be very confidential. If my sensibility, by long and severe exercise, had not been almost exhausted, it would have been deeply affected, at the late descision in this state. After all the manœuvers and intrigues of a certain popular first magistrate, 213 and his faithfull emisaries, there was not one man returned by the people, from all the districts of the commonwealth, as an Elector, whose sentiments were even equivocal; unless it were one in a remote part, whose name I never heard before—and his opinion was only dubious.

I am my Dear Sir, your affectionate Friend

Dft in an unknown hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Dr Rush.” Some loss of text due to wear at the edge. Filmed at 3 Dec. 1788.

1.

James Cannon, Timothy Matlack, and Dr. Thomas Young led the faction that produced the 1776 Pennsylvania constitution, which was influenced by the political thought of Thomas Paine (vol. 13:498).

2.

JA evidently savored this anecdote of “a very vulgar dialogue between Brigadier Rugles and Counsellor Tyler” (to William Smith Shaw, 16 June 1821, ICN:Herbert R. Strauss Coll.). Lawyer Timothy Ruggles (1711–1795), Harvard 1732, of Hardwick, Mass., served as speaker of the Mass. house of representatives from 1762 to 1764. Ruggles, a loyalist, relocated to Nova Scotia in 1783. Boston merchant Royall Tyler Sr. (1724–1771), Harvard 1743, was a veteran of the Massachusetts governor’s council in the 1760s and an active member of the Sons of Liberty (JA, D&A , 1:85; 2:77, 226–227; Sibley’s Harvard Graduates , 9:208, 221; 11:317; JA, Earliest Diary , p. 22).

3.

At this point there is a notation “21,” perhaps referring to Rush’s 21 Feb. 1789 reply, below.