Papers of John Adams, volume 19
C’est du choc des idées, Monsieur, que naît la vérité: M. Turgot ne pouvoit pas être combattu par un plus digne adversaire; tous deux amans de la liberté et du bonheur des hommes, vous tendez au même but par differens moiens, et vous les avez tous les deux éclairés.
C’est M. de Valnais2 qui m’a apporté votre Livre, et mon Séjour habituel à Versailles pour l’Assemblée de Notables ne me permet 28 pas de l’en remercier de vive voix; agréez, je vous prie mes actions de graces de votre Souvenir et de votre présent, et l’expression Sincere de l’estime et de l’attachement avec lequel j’ai l’honneur d’être, Monsieur, Votre très humble et très obeissant serviteur,
Ma mere et ma femme me chargent de tous leurs complimens pour vous.
Truth, sir, is born of the clash of ideas. Mr. Turgot could not have been confronted by a more worthy opponent; both devoted to liberty and to the happiness of men, you reach toward the same goal by different means, and you have both illuminated the way.
It is Mr. de Valnais2 who brought me your book, and my customary sojourn at Versailles for the Assembly of Notables does not permit me to thank him in person. Please accept my sentiments of gratitude for your remembrance and your gift and the sincere expression of the esteem and the attachment with which I have the honor to be, sir, your most humble and most obedient servant
My mother and wife wish me to convey all their respects to you.
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “M. Adams.”
French writer Louis Alexandre, Duc de La Rochefoucauld d’Anville (1743–1792), was the son of Marie Louise Nicole de La Rochefoucauld and the husband of Alexandrine Charlotte de Rohan Chabot (Hoefer, Nouv. biog. générale
).
That is, Joseph de Valnais, the former French consul in Boston.
In my Answer to the Letter I had the honor of receiveg from you last Fall by Dr Wales,1 I expressed my Apprehension that the Abbe Mably and some other of our European Friends entertained too gloomy despairing & desconsolate Ideas and Fears, least our Amer̃ Republic should tumble to pieces and come to nothing. Even our worthy & ever to be venerated Friend Dr Price has his Fears for us; and so had Mrs. Macaulay at her first Landing here, but she altered her Judgment and returned with Consolation. The greater part [of the] learned Abbe’s Difficulties & Dangers are nothing [. . . .]ind. We may be capricious, we may do 1000 foolish Things [. . .]ties,
29
without ruining the Fœderation or the growing Glory of the United States. There is a com̃on a public Interest, which it is & will be the Interest of too many Millions of Individuals to take Care of; and there is Wisdom transfused through this Body of Individuals; and the Confederation embosoms enough of internal Power to enforce & carry into Execution what Wisdom shall feel to be the public Interest:—there is & will be too much of all these Things to permit a Possibility of the public Interest being essentially neglected. Antient & modern History affords us little Light. They have no Parallels to our State. Of the few Republics that are or ever have been on Earth, there is not one that has any radical Resemblance to ours: there is not one which has Landed Property so equably diffused among the People, as to generate a constant Depende upon and give a decided & permanent Dominion in the People;—I mean in Election of their Governors & chief Rulers—not in Insurrections against the Senate or grand State Representative which stands on their annual Election & Revocation. Even the most libertine Spirits must be sooner or later convinced that, if they should manufacture the Politics never so often, they would terminate in an annual or elected Assembly, as the ultimatum of Liberty. Should civil Wars arise, and thro’ Confiscations Property be Shifted,—yet the most accumulated Property without Entails & Perpetuities will not be dangerous; for such is family fatality that thro’ Luxury & Permission to aliene hereditary Estates, vix Tertius gaudeat Hæres,2 & then it reverts in Effect to the public & mixes with the com̃on Mass of public Prop[erty.]
This has lain by me unfinished for a Leisure Hour of Calmness. But I must beg Leave to dispatch it hastily, to gratify a worthy Friend & Patriot Saml Bishop Esqr who has a son in London, for whom he is very sollicitous. His son Abm. Bishop Esqr is a young Lawyer, graduated here 1778, and last winter went to Lond to finish or perfect the jural Studies, and is now at one of the Inns.3 Should he wait upon yourself, it would be highly pleasg to his worthy Father, that you shd impart to him your kind Counsel as to his Conduct and the Pursuit of his Studies, during the year he proposes to spend in London. I have the Honor to be, Sir, / Yr most obliged hble servt
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excelly Dr Jno Adams.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
Stiles’ previous letter to JA, of 28 Aug. 1786, was carried to Europe by Rev. Samuel Wales of Raynham, Mass., then the Livingston Professor of Divinity at Yale College (vol. 18:286, 432).
Stiles paraphrased the adage “De male quæsitis vix gaudet tertius hæres,” or, a third heir seldom enjoys what is dishonestly acquired.
The budding politician and writer Abraham Bishop (1763–1844), of New Haven, Yale 1778, spent 1787 on a grand tour of Europe, much like his friend and classmate, the poet Joel Barlow. There is no indication that Bishop contacted JA in London, and, once returned to America, Bishop became a staunch critic of the proposed U.S. Constitution. After serving a series of county judicial appointments, Bishop succeeded his father, Samuel Bishop Jr. (1723–1803), in 1803 as port collector at New Haven, a post he held until 1829 (Dexter, Yale Graduates
, 4:17–24; Franklin Bowditch Dexter, comp., Historical Catalogue of the Members of the First Church of Christ in New Haven, Connecticut (Center Church): A.D. 1639–1914, New Haven, 1914, p. 85).