Papers of John Adams, volume 19

178 To John Adams from Philip Mazzei, 7 October 1787 Mazzei, Philip Adams, John
From Philip Mazzei
Stimmo: Signor mio, Parigi, 7 8bre 1787. 1

Il nostro degno amico Sigr: Jefferson mi comunicò tempo fa i progressi di Vostr’ Eccellenza nella lingua toscana, e il suo desiderio ch’io Le scrivessi nella detta lingua, ogni qual volta mi prendessi la libertà d’incomodarla, facendo uso d’uno stile semplice e chiaro. Eecomi dunque ad obbedire ai suoi comandi, e secondo il solito per chieder favori.

Il Sigr: Jefferson ed io abbiamo pensato, che la relazione della sollevazion di Massachusets, messa a confronto con quel che è successo di simile negli ultimi undici anni nella Granbrettagna, in Francia, e nell’Impero Ottomanno, potrebbe far prova in favor dei nostri governi, tanto in riguardo alla rarità del fatto, che alle cause, alla condotta, e agli effetti.

Ciò dovrebbe far parte d’un supplemento che sto scrivendo per la mia opera, e che non posso indugiar molto a mandare sotto il torchio, poichè n’è già stampato il sesto foglio della quarta e ultima parte. Se Vostr’ Eccellenza volesse dunque favorirmi, con tutta la sollecitudine possibile, un ragguaglio esatto delle sollevazioni seguite in codest’ isola nel detto spazio di tempo, Le ne professerei una grande obbligazione.2

Sono stato informato della fiera malattia del mio caro amico e suo degno genero Col: Smith; La prego di reverirmelo cordialmente, e di ragguagliarmi del presente stato della sua salute. La supplico parimente di presentare i miei umili e sinceri ossequi alla sue Signore, Consorte e Figlia, di onorarmi presto dei suoi comandi, e di permettermi ch’io mi soscriva con egual dose d’affetto e di rispetto, / Di Vostr’ Eccellenza, / Devmo: ed Umilmo: Servitore

Filippo Mazzei
TRANSLATION
Most esteemed sir Paris, October 7 1787 1

Our worthy friend Mr. Jefferson communicated to me some time ago your excellency’s progress with the Tuscan language, and your desire that I should write to you in the said language, whenever I had the freedom to accommodate your wishes, using a simple and clear style. Here I am, then, obeying your commands and, as usual, asking for favors.

Mr. Jefferson and I thought that the account of the Massachusetts uprising, compared with the similar events of the past eleven years in Great 179 Britain, France and the Ottoman Empire, could serve as proof in favor of our governments, as much with regard to the rarity of the event as to the causes, the conduct and the effects.

This account will be part of a supplement that I am writing for my work, which I cannot much delay in sending to press, since the sixth sheet of the fourth and last part is already printed. If your excellency would therefore provide me with, as promptly as possible, the exact details of the uprisings that occurred on that island, then I should be greatly obliged to you.2

I have been informed of the grave illness of my dear friend and your worthy son-in-law Colonel Smith. Please give him my regards, and let me know of the present state of his health. I also entreat you to present my humble and sincere respects to your ladies, wife and daughter, to honor me soon with your commands and to permit me to sign with an equal dose of affection and respect, your excellency’s most devoted and most humble servant

Filippo Mazzei

RC (Adams Papers).

1.

This rare Italian-language letter, one of two that Mazzei sent, came at JA’s request (to Thomas Jefferson, 10 July, above). The second letter, Mazzei’s of 11 Jan. 1788, is below.

2.

JA apparently did not send further details of Shays’ Rebellion to Mazzei, though the topic arose briefly in the concluding “Supplement” of Mazzei’s four-volume Recherches historiques et politiques, Paris, 1788, with regard to the unsettled state of Anglo-American relations. Denouncing the “affected negligence” with which the Court of St. James had greeted JA, Mazzei questioned why a British minister had not been appointed to America. Mazzei wrote, “Men in key positions in England claim we want to go back under British rule and say they would refuse to grant such a request; this statement is denied by British subjects in America. The general opinion in Massachusetts is that these maneuvers had much to do with Shay’s Rebellion.” He described Americans’ surprise at the Shaysite ringleaders’ pardon, and he concluded that “calm has been restored” (Philip Mazzei, Researches on the United States, ed. and transl. Constance D. Sherman, Charlottesville, Va., 1976, p. 401, 402).

From John Adams to John Jay, 9 October 1787 Adams, John Jay, John
To John Jay
Dear Sir Grosvenor Square October 9, 1787

France appears at this Moment, in the Light of a Simple People Sincerely disposed to Peace, benevolence and Humanity, and judging of the dispositions of others by her own. She seems by her late Glory and Prosperity to have been Soothed into a Security and Tranquility, out of which it is Scarce possible to awaken her. England on the other hand appears, like a Nation Smarting under her Wounds, but covering her designs with a Veil of deep Dissimulation, while she was exerting her utmost Craft to obtain an opportunity of Gratifying her Resentment. We need not look farther for the Cause of the present Strange Appearances than the Diplomatic Arrangements of the two Nations.— Never was there a Time, when able and Attentive Men were so neccessary for France at the Courts of 180 London, and the Hague as at the late Peace. The Comte de Vergennes should have Sent to both Places, Men of the most inlarged Capacities, and dilligent Attention to the whole System of Europe. The Marquis de Verac, is as honest a Man, and as well intentioned, as he could have found. But I believe every Man who knows him will agree with me that a Gentleman more unqualified for his Mission could not have been found.1 The Comte D’Adhemar, has an elegant Figure an handsome Face, and is a Favourite of the Ladies but whether from his unfortunate paralitick stroke, or from his having no Turn for the Business of State, he appears to have been inattentive, not only to the affairs of Europe in General but to those of England and Holland. The Spanish Minister has been extreamly Attentive to make his Court to the Royal Family and the Ministry here, and has been so successful as to obtain the Kings request, that he might be promoted to the Rank of a Marquis at home, and to that of Ambassador here: but to Speak freely to you as I ought, he does not appear to me to know or care any Thing much about the System of Europe.—2 The French Chargé too, who is an ingenious Man and well behaved, has had the good fortune to recommend himself to this Court So as to be, promoted to the Rank of Min. Plen. at their Instance.—3 I have ever been upon good terms with all these Gentlemen, and have no personal dislike to any of them: but I cannot but See and lament the Causes, which appear to have contributed to a Catastrophy, So outragious to the Rights of Mankind, and So humiliating, to the best Friends We have or ever had in France Holland and Spain.— I must confess that Favouritism, at the Court where he resides, in an Ambassador, of any denomination, is in my Opinion a fatal Objection against him: because I know it to be impossible to be obtained without the most criminal Simulation on one hand, or Negligence or something worse of the Interests of his Constituents on the other. There is a great difference between being esteemed and beloved: between being upon decent, civil and respectable Terms, and being taken into the Arms and embraced. Whenever and Wherever this is seen in Negotiations, Something may justly be suspected to be amiss.— unfortunately too Monsr. de st. Priest, who has been long in Constantinople, and had a great Reputation for Ability and Success, in former Negotiations, was recalled at a most critical Time.—4 England on the Contrary, Appears to have been meditating a Blow, even when the Nation were generally expecting the Commencement of the Millenium from the 181 Operation of the Commercial Treaty.— She has Sent her Shrewdest Men to Versailles and the Hague. She appears to have been intriguing at Constantinople as well as in South America. She has been forming a League in Germany: and maintaining her Navy on a formidable Footing.— France may be as indifferent as she will about Holland, but that will not Secure her Peace. The English cannot See, without inward Rage and Fury, I might say without Terror and dismay, the Works at Cherbourg. and Let Hollands fate be what it will. Let The Turks be disposed of as you please. in my Opinion France must demolish Cherbourg and Spain Set South America at Liberty, or there will be War. The Passions of this Nation are at present in a Flame; I hear Such a Language even in the Streets, and in Booksellers shops, the only Scænes of popular Politicks into which I think it prudent to venture, that I am confident a War is not far off.— The Rage of this nation amazes me.— With a Gulph and a Precipice of public Ruin before their Eyes they are ready to take the Leap with Joy. The most interesting Question for Us is whether We shall be neutral.? This is undoubtedly our Wisdom. and Congress and the states will take the most decided Measures to prevent our People from giving any Provocation. They will no doubt forbid in the most effectual Manner any of their Citizens from Serving on board the Ships of either Nation, much less from taking Commissions and committing depredations. But will all this preserve our Neutrality.? It is my Duty to be explicit upon this occasion, and to say, that Although the British Government may pretend and even Sincerely endeavour, to avoid a quarrel with the United States at the Commencement of the War, yet if they Should Obtain any signal Successes at first, which it is not improbable they may, there will arise Such a Spirit of Domination and Insolence in the Nation, as will stimulate Hostilities, against Us. It is my duty therefore, to advise, that the best Preparations, for our own defence and Security be made, that is in our Power.

The Detail of Affairs in Holland is too dismal, to be repeated. The News Papers contain Accounts melancholly enough. The Plebeians and the Monarch are too closely connected, in Holland, to be overcome by the Patrician Aristocracy, and no rational Plan of a Reformation of their Government has been concerted by the People or their Leaders. It is a repetition of the Catastrophy of all ill constituted Republicks, and is a living Warning to our United States.

With great Regard I have the Honour / to be, dear sir your most obedient / and most humble servant

John Adams
182

RC (PCC, No. 84, VI, f. 535–538); internal address: “His Excellency John Jay Esqr / Secretary of state &c.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 112.

1.

Charles Olivier de Saint Georges, Marquis de Vérac, served as French ambassador to the Netherlands from 1785 to 1787 ( Repertorium , 3:126).

2.

Bernardo del Campo y Pérez de la Serna served as Spain’s minister to Britain from 1783 to 1795 (same, 3:432–433).

3.

Except for a brief hiatus, François Barthélemy had served as the French chargé d’affaires in London since July 1784 ( AFC , 6:311).

4.

François Emmanuel Guignard, Comte de St. Priest, served as French minister to the Ottoman Empire from 1768 to 1784 ( Repertorium , 3:142).