Papers of John Adams, volume 19

To John Adams from the Chevalier de Pinto, 7 September 1787 Pinto de Balsamão, Luiz Adams, John
From the Chevalier de Pinto
Monsieur. A Londres ce 7me. Septembre 1787

J’ai eû ordre de ma Coûr de faire parvenir à votre connoissance, que quoique on ait differé jusqu’ici de repondre au project d’un Traité de Commerce, sur le quel nous êtions concertés à Londres, ne a moins, Monsieur, les desirs de Sa Majesté Trés Fidelle ne sont 152 ni moins vifs, ni moins efficâces pour Conclure avec Les Etâts Unis d’Amerique ce même Traité, a des Terms et a des Conditions convennables; et J’ai ordre d’y ajouter encore, que ma Cour ne tardera pas Monsieur, à vous donner les preuves les plus convaincantes, et les plus immediates.1

Je suis chargè en même tems de vous faire observer, combien il seroit utile et convenable, qu’il y êut des Ministres nomées au plus tôt entre les deux Puissances; et ma Coûr m’ordonne exprêssement de tacher de me concérter avec vous, Monsieur, súr ce point important; et de convenir defenitivement sur le Caràctere que ces mêmes Ministres doivent porter dans leurs Mitions! A cet’egard, il est esséntiel de vous prevenir, qu’il será nécessaire de le fixer (pour le moin) au tître de Ministre Resident, à cause des entrées á la Coûr de Lisbonne, qui ne sont jàmais accordées, ni a des simples Agênts, ni à des Consuls Generaux: et aussitôt que ce point serà arreté, j’ai ordre de vous assûrer Monsieur, que La Coûr de Lisbonne ne perderà pas du tems à nomér, et a faire partir pour L’Amerique cellui qu’elle aura destiné a resider aupres du Congréz des Etâts Unis.2

J’ai l’honneur d’etre avec autant de / consideration que de respect / Monsieur. / votre tres humble et tres / obeissant Serviteur

Le chr. DePinto.
TRANSLATION
Sir London, 7 September 1787

My court has ordered me to inform you that although we have delayed responding up until now regarding the prospective commercial treaty for which we met in London, nevertheless, sir, the wish of Her Most Faithful Majesty is no less ardent, nor less keen, to conclude the same treaty with the United States under acceptable terms and conditions. I have been directed to add, moreover, that my court will not delay, sir, in demonstrating the most convincing and immediate proof thereof.1

I have been asked at the same time to point out to you that it would be very useful and suitable to nominate ministers as soon as possible between the two powers, and my court expressly orders me to try to arrange this important matter with you, sir, and to agree definitively on the status that these ministers will have on their missions. Because receptions at the court of Lisbon are never accorded simply to agents, nor to consuls general, it is imperative in this regard to let you know that it will be necessary to establish their status as resident minister at the very least. As soon as this point is agreed upon, I am ordered to assure you, sir, that the court of Lisbon will lose no time in appointing and sending to America the person chosen to reside with the United States Congress.2

153

I have the honor to be, with as much consideration as respect, sir, your most humble and most obedient servant

Le chr. DePinto.

RC (PCC, No. 84, VI, f. 509–513).

1.

For the [25 April 1786] proposed Portuguese-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce, see vol. 18:256–271. This agreement, the third effort at a formal treaty between the two nations, remained in limbo. In his 12 Sept. 1787 report to John Jay, WSS wrote that Maria I insisted that Portugal and the United States exchange ministers before the treaty could be finalized. Following JA’s departure from Europe, Thomas Jefferson nurtured hopes for the long-proposed agreement. In a 12 March 1789 letter to Jay, Jefferson wrote that he was hopeful that negotiation would resume, with the support of Luiz Pinto de Balsamão, the Portuguese envoy extraordinary and minister to Britain. A Portuguese-American treaty, however, was not signed and ratified until 1840 ( Dipl. Corr., 1783–1789 , 3:69–77; Jefferson, Papers , 14:646).

2.

No appointment was made in response either to this letter or to JA’s 10 Sept. 1787 letter to Jay, below. Portugal and the United States did not exchange ministers until Maria I appointed Ciprião Ribeiro, Chevalier de Freire (1749–1824), in 1790, and George Washington nominated David Humphreys on 18 Feb. 1791 (vol. 18:109; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 16:101; AFC , 9:194).

From John Adams to John Jay, 10 September 1787 Adams, John Jay, John
To John Jay
Dear Sir Grosvenor Square London Septr 10. 1787

Inclosed is a Copy of a Letter from the Portugese Minister, to me of the 7. of September and my Answer of this day the tenth.1

This is So pointed a Proposition, that Congress will undoubtedly Send an Answer either in the affirmative or Negative. The Regard of Sovereigns to one another, renders this indispensable. and I am not able to See how a Complyance with so civil a request can well be avoided. Congress may agree to the Proposition, and her Majesty will appoint her Minister, and whether the American Minister is soon appointed or not, and whether his Appointment is for one year or not, the Forms and Decencies will be preserved. if it were only on Account of the Algerines to watch their Motions and concert Measures against them, I should think it prudent for the United States to have a Minister at Lisbon.

Colonel Smith will write you, an Account of his Journey and Voyage, and of the termination of his Commission, According to his Wishes and to his Satisfaction.2 Congress I hope, too, will be Satisified. But if a Regular Minister, had been Sent, upon this Service, and ordered to return as soon as he had accomplished it her Majesty would probably have Sent a Minister to New York without further delay. I ought not to conclude, without observing that these Missions by Deputation, are unknown to Courts and Ministers, and to the Law of Nations. And if a Legal Question Should ever be made concerning them the United States will infallibly be dishonoured by a 154 formal Decision against them. in Mr Barclays Case, had the decision of the Parliament of Bordeaux, been appealed from to Court it must have been reversed.3

The Character of Ambassadors is Sacred and their Prerogatives very high, both by the Law of Nations and the Ceremonials of all Courts and sovereigns and there is great Reason to fear, that the Citizens of America will have Cause for Severe Repentance, if they make too light of it. Indulgences founded on the Supposition of our Inexperience, or to use a more intelligible Word our Ignorance cannot be expected to continue long. Colonel Smith met with a Condiscention that astonished all the Foreign Ministers, and Mr Barclay with a good Fortune, of which it is very dangerous to try another Experiment.

With great Regard, I have the honour / to be, dear sir, your most obedient / and most humble servant

John Adams.

RC and enclosures (PCC, No. 84, VI, f. 505–507); internal address; “His Excellency John Jay / Secretary of State &c.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 112.

1.

Jay’s 23 Jan. 1788 letter transmitting JA’s letter and enclosures was read in Congress on 1 Feb. ( JCC , 34:22–23).

2.

For WSS’s mission to Portugal and his 12 Sept. 1787 report to Jay, see WSS’s commission and instructions of [11 April], above. On 4 Aug. WSS was presented to Maria I. He sent a copy of his address, with the queen’s reply in Portuguese, to Jay with his 12 Sept. report. “I will shew them the distinguished prize I set on them,” a contemporary translation in WSS’s hand of the queen’s reply read, “and my invariable disposition to strengthen between the two States the ties of a solid and permanent friendship.” In light of WSS’s mission, on 12 March 1788 Jay urged Congress to resume treaty negotiations and to appoint a U.S. minister to Portugal. Jay wrote directly to WSS on 12 Aug., lauding his diplomatic service ( Dipl. Corr., 1783–1789 , 3:69–77, 81–85; PCC, No. 92, I, f. 347–350).

3.

For Thomas Barclay’s arrest, see his 3 April 1787 letter, and note 2, above.