Papers of John Adams, volume 19
I had the pleasure to receive your favor this morning shall be very happy to receive you & mrs Adams your own day tuesday 11th:
pray tell Col Smith I will not say one word about the conditions of his visit but shall be glad to see him & his Lady on his own terms. these Americans will have their own way and so let them.
if it was possible I should be glad to see Jennings with you. however we will meet in town.
I am perfectly satisfied without reading more.
I know not how the date escaped me but beleive it was last friday the post mark will show it if necessary.
The preface to Bellendenus, a scarce book almost forgot, will entertain you it is the subject of conversation & cried up by opposition. The Author I know, is a clergyman very sensible & one of the first greek scholars but between ourselves an Apostate in civil & religious matters.1
The American Spirit is up in France Holland & Brabant & I hope in Peru may it live.2
Adieu, till I see you & Mrs Adams here in perfect health & good spirit. / I am Dear Sir / with great regard / your sincere Friend
RC (Adams Papers).
English schoolmaster Samuel Parr (1747–1825), of Harrow on the Hill, was curate of Hatton, England. Parr wrote a Latin preface, Praefatio ad Bellendenum, to the Scottish professor William Bellenden’s (ca. 1550–1633) treatises, which included the unfinished piece De tribus luminibus romanorum. The entire work was published as Gulielmi bellendeni magistri supplicum libellorum augusti regis magnæ britanniæ, &c. de statu libri tres, London, 1787 (
DNB
).
Hollis referred to the 1780–1783 Andean rebellion against Spanish administrative and fiscal reforms. The revolt was led by Juan Gabriel Condorcanqui, who proclaimed himself Inca Túpac Amaru II in 1780 (J. H. Elliot, Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America, 1492–1830, New Haven, 2006, p. 355, 356, 358).
me.Septembre 1787
J’ai eû ordre de ma Coûr de faire parvenir à votre connoissance, que quoique on ait differé jusqu’ici de repondre au project d’un Traité de Commerce, sur le quel nous êtions concertés à Londres, ne a moins, Monsieur, les desirs de Sa Majesté Trés Fidelle ne sont 152 ni moins vifs, ni moins efficâces pour Conclure avec Les Etâts Unis d’Amerique ce même Traité, a des Terms et a des Conditions convennables; et J’ai ordre d’y ajouter encore, que ma Cour ne tardera pas Monsieur, à vous donner les preuves les plus convaincantes, et les plus immediates.1
Je suis chargè en même tems de vous faire observer, combien il seroit utile et convenable, qu’il y êut des Ministres nomées au plus tôt entre les deux Puissances; et ma Coûr m’ordonne exprêssement de tacher de me concérter avec vous, Monsieur, súr ce point important; et de convenir defenitivement sur le Caràctere que ces mêmes Ministres doivent porter dans leurs Mitions! A cet’egard, il est esséntiel de vous prevenir, qu’il será nécessaire de le fixer (pour le moin) au tître de Ministre Resident, à cause des entrées á la Coûr de Lisbonne, qui ne sont jàmais accordées, ni a des simples Agênts, ni à des Consuls Generaux: et aussitôt que ce point serà arreté, j’ai ordre de vous assûrer Monsieur, que La Coûr de Lisbonne ne perderà pas du tems à nomér, et a faire partir pour L’Amerique cellui qu’elle aura destiné a resider aupres du Congréz des Etâts Unis.2
J’ai l’honneur d’etre avec autant de / consideration que de respect / Monsieur. / votre tres humble et tres / obeissant Serviteur
r.DePinto.
My court has ordered me to inform you that although we have delayed responding up until now regarding the prospective commercial treaty for which we met in London, nevertheless, sir, the wish of Her Most Faithful Majesty is no less ardent, nor less keen, to conclude the same treaty with the United States under acceptable terms and conditions. I have been directed to add, moreover, that my court will not delay, sir, in demonstrating the most convincing and immediate proof thereof.1
I have been asked at the same time to point out to you that it would be very useful and suitable to nominate ministers as soon as possible between the two powers, and my court expressly orders me to try to arrange this important matter with you, sir, and to agree definitively on the status that these ministers will have on their missions. Because receptions at the court of Lisbon are never accorded simply to agents, nor to consuls general, it is imperative in this regard to let you know that it will be necessary to establish their status as resident minister at the very least. As soon as this point is agreed upon, I am ordered to assure you, sir, that the court of Lisbon will lose no time in appointing and sending to America the person chosen to reside with the United States Congress.2
153I have the honor to be, with as much consideration as respect, sir, your most humble and most obedient servant
r.DePinto.
RC (PCC, No. 84, VI, f. 509–513).
For the [25 April 1786] proposed Portuguese-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce, see vol. 18:256–271. This agreement, the third effort at a formal treaty between the two nations, remained in limbo. In his 12 Sept. 1787 report to John Jay, WSS wrote that Maria I insisted that Portugal and the United States exchange ministers before the treaty could be finalized. Following JA’s departure from Europe, Thomas Jefferson nurtured hopes for the long-proposed agreement. In a 12 March 1789 letter to Jay, Jefferson wrote that he was hopeful that negotiation would resume, with the support of Luiz Pinto de Balsamão, the Portuguese envoy extraordinary and minister to Britain. A Portuguese-American treaty, however, was not signed and ratified until 1840 (
Dipl. Corr., 1783–1789
, 3:69–77; Jefferson, Papers
, 14:646).
No appointment was made in response either to this letter or to
JA’s 10 Sept. 1787 letter to Jay, below. Portugal and the United States did not exchange ministers until Maria I appointed Ciprião Ribeiro, Chevalier de Freire (1749–1824), in 1790, and George Washington nominated David Humphreys on 18 Feb. 1791 (vol. 18:109; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series
, 16:101;
AFC
, 9:194).