Papers of John Adams, volume 19

To John Adams from Christopher Gadsden, 24 July 1787 Gadsden, Christopher Adams, John
From Christopher Gadsden
Charleston so. Carolina 24th July 1787 My Worthy Friend

I am much obliged to You for your kind Remembrance of me, & the very Acceptable present You sent me, by Mr Gibbes, Your Defence of our Constitutions, wch. I read with the greatest Attention & as much pleasure, & am glad to hear by a Friend of mine at the Convention that ’tis much read there, he sent me a Copy printed at Philada. but Yours came to hand a few Days before.1 In another State I hope we shall be happy under a simple Governmt. directed by infinite Wisdom & Goodness, but in the present, while Strugling with such various & contradictory passions, Nothing less than the most artful playing them one against another, Wholesale & Retail, (if I may use the Expression) can insure us any tollerable lasting peace & Security, either publicly or privately, “All nature’s Difference keeps all Nature’s peace”2 according to your Well-chosen Motto, is as true a proposition as any in Euclid— I must own I was once fond of a Simple Constitution of Governmt. as much so perhaps as Mr. Turgot, but have been some Time convinced, however pleasing & entertaining it appear’d in Idea, that it was there only, & cou’d not, as Mankind are, be Reduced to practice, The three distinct checks You mention in Legislature, seem to be indespensably necessary with one Executive, I think We are so far happy in having all these at certain periods elegible by the people, but annual Elections are rather too frequent in my Opinion— Some of our Governor’s have not a Negative, this State’s particularly, which I am sorry for, tho’ at the early Time of framing our Constitution or rather extraordinary Governmental Law, Inter-Arma, I confess I was then against it, but shou’d there be a Convention to revise it, or rather make a real Constitution, I wish our Governrs may be allowd a Negative— Unhappily, rather from Inattention & Inexperience than Design, Our Assemblies at Times have interfer’d too much in the judicial 123 Department, Whereas the three, the Deliberative, Judicial & Executive, ought to be altogether separate, the permitting our Judges to set in the Assembly, is I think very improper & has a natural Tendency to introduce a Confusion of Departments—

This my Dear Sir I hope will be deliver’d You by the Son of a late Worthy Friend Mr. John Edwards, who was prisoner with me at Augustine, a Gentleman who by his Industry, had with great Reputation, acquired a very handsome provision for a large Family, but by lending great part of it to the public, & other common Accidents of the late Times, his Fortune at his Death was much Reduced, My Youngest Son Married one of his Daughters, Sister to this Young Gentleman, Any Countenance You may shew him I shall be obliged to You for. I believe You’ll find him a very modest well inclin’d Youth.3

With Regard to myself, having been as active as most Men in America for near thirty Years, I have now taken a passive Turn, & indeed it is high Time, as I am pretty well advanced in Life, I am entirely the private Gentleman, endeavouring to Repair, the amazing damages done me during the late Struggle, No Man in this State having suffer’d more in proportion to his Fortune— However I rejoice that Heaven has bless’d us with Success, & only wish our American Friends may make a proper Use of it—

I am Dr. Sir / With Sincere Esteem / Yr. most obedt. hble servt.

Christ Gadsden

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mr C. Gadsden / 24. July. 1787.”

1.

Christopher Gadsden (1723–1805), of Charleston, S.C., represented South Carolina in the Continental Congress and served with JA on several committees. JA remembered him as a key southern delegate who was “always on my Side” (vol. 3:8, 136, 142, 147; JA, D&A , 3:330; Biog. Dir. Cong. ).

2.

For the title page of the first volume of the Defence of the Const. , JA selected this epigram from Alexander Pope’s Essay on Man, Epistle IV, line 56.

3.

Catherine Edwards married Philip Gadsden on 19 Nov 1783 in Charleston. Her father, John (d. 1781), had been banished and imprisoned by the British with Christopher Gadsden in St. Augustine, Fla., after the British seized Charleston in 1780 (Mary Pringle Fenhagen, “John Edwards and Some of His Descendants,” SCHGM , 55:17, 18, 21, 26).

To John Adams from the Board of Treasury, 25 July 1787 Board of Treasury Adams, John
From the Board of Treasury
Sir. — Board of Treasury July 25th: 1787.

We are favor’d with your Letter of the 8th: of May last, transmitting Protests for Non Acceptance of the two Bills of Exchange for 75,000 Florins; drawn by Constable Rucker & Co. of New York on their Partner Mr. John Rucker of London— From the Solidity of the 124 House by whom the Bill was drawn (being in Partnership with Mr. Robert Morris of Phila.) we had not the most distant Apprehension of any Disappointment in this Remittance; you may therefore judge of our Surprise, and Mortification; when previous to the Receipt of your Letter, we heard of Mr: Ruckers Arrival in this City— It gives us Pleasure to inform you that this Gentleman is returned by Direction of Mr. Morris, to take up the Bills drawn on him; and that we have the fullest Assurance, from the House, that Effectual Measures will be adopted for Paying the Bills remitted to you when they become due— We are glad you changed your first Intentions of transmitting the Original Bills; you will be pleas’d to have them presented for Payment, when at Maturity—

Your Communications to Congress on the Subject of the Loan you have Effected, in Consequence of this and other Circumstances for one Million of Florins, having been referred to this Board; we have agreed on a Report, approving of the same, and recommending an Immediate Ratification—As soon as the Determination of Congress is made known to us, you shall be acquainted with the Result—1

We have the Honor to be with Esteem, / Your Obedt: Humble Servts:

Samuel Osgood Arthur Lee

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Honorable John Adams Esqr. / Minister Plenipotentiary / from the United States to / the Court of Great- / Britain.” Dupl (Adams Papers).

1.

After a quick trip to New York City, John Rucker journeyed to London and then returned to New York, where he died on 15 June 1788 (Charles Rappleye, Robert Morris: Financier of the American Revolution, N.Y., 2010, p. 452; AFC , 8:272).

This was the last letter that the Board of Treasury sent to JA regarding the management of American public funds in Europe. JA likely received it on 21 Sept. 1787, at the same time that he received John Jay’s 31 July letter, below, and enclosures containing congressional instructions respecting the third Dutch loan of [1 June 1787].