Papers of John Adams, volume 18

To John Adams from James Warren, 22 October 1786 Warren, James Adams, John

From James Warren

My dear Sir Milton Octr 22d. 1786

A few days since, I had the pleasure of receiving yours of the 4th. July—

You think the picture I gave you in my last too high wrought.1 You Cannot be of my opinion that there is here a total Change in Principles, & Manners. nor that Interest is the only pursuit. & that riches only are respected.

Your distance will not permit you to form your Opinion from your own Observation. Your partiality for your Country Inclines you to more favourable Accounts, and that Patriotism which I revere Exhibits to your Imagination more Agreable Colours, & like self Love hides those deformities which disgust, & give pain. I sincerely wish that the present situation of the Country was such as to Justify your partiality & wishes, & to Condemn any picture, & the Opinion & Apprehensions I Expressed to you, but Unhappily it does not. We are now in a State of anarchy & Confusion bordering on a Civil War. The General Court at their last Session could not or would not see the general Uneasiness that threatneded this Event. however they did not provide for the public Tranquility dureing their recess. but dosed themselves into an Unusual Adjournment for 6 or 7 Months. They have been Called to Meet on the present Occasion sooner than the Time Adjourned to, have set near a Month without any Appearance of that Wisdom & Address necessary to redress the Unhappy situation we are fallen into.—

I do not say that they are Incompetent to the Business before them, or that the State of things is Incapable of redress, but it is possible, (at least) that they should set, till next Election without deviseing the Mode of doing it. The Papers will Inform you that the Three upper Counties, (and Bristol is not much better) have refused submission to the Government Established by the constitution, & obedience to the Laws made under it, that is they have violated their Compact, & are in a State of Rebellion while the three 486 Eastern Counties are petitioning to be seperated from us, & formed into a New Government, of their own Construction. These are very Singular Events, which must have been produced by some singular Causes, if they are the Natural Consequences of that State of things I described in my last. you will not think my picture more horrible than the reality.2 I have long been Mortified by the Imbecility, & Inattention with which our public Affairs have been Conducted. it is probable that when I wrote that Letter I felt also some Indignation. I Claim a right to Express it to you. my small Efforts were Joined with yours, & others for many Years in rearing a Glorious Fabrick on Foundations that should have been as permanent as Time, but suffered to fall into ruin in less than half the Time it took to Build it. I feel for the Character of the Country. I am Mortified at the Triumphs of our Enemies. I am sorry for you, who must from your Situation be peculiarly Exposed to them. I wish every thing may be so Conducted as to restore order, & submission to Government, but I fear it will be some time first. The Scarcity of Money is a great Obstacle, and the folly and Extravagance that Made it scarce, in a great degree remains.— I am Acquainted with Coll Smith Character, tho I have not the pleasure of knowing his Person. I am glad you have given your Daughter to a Man of so much Merit. please to give her my Blessing & good Wishes

Mrs. Warren desires her regards, to be Joined with mine to Mr & Mrs. Adams & Mr & Mrs. Smith.

I am with great / Esteem & regard Your Most / Obedt. Humbl. Servt

James Warren 26th:

I have Just heard that the Supreem Court are setting at Taunton supported by 450 of the Militia, which proved a Stronger Body than the Mob mustered to prevent it—3

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams Esqr”; endorsed: “Gen. Warren / Oct. 22. ansd. Jany 9. / 1787.”

Warren refers to his comments on the decline of the American character in his 30 April letter, which JA had roundly criticized in his 4 July reply, both above, but see JA’s 9 Jan. 1787 letter, below, for his revised view in light of the events of Shays’ Rebellion of which he was by then more fully informed.

These were the Maine counties of York, Cumberland, and Lincoln, which in Sept. 1786 drafted a petition for secession to be submitted to the Mass. General Court. The Maine representatives in the General Court were not, by and large, supporters of the Shaysites (Hall, Politics without Parties , p. 177–178).

Warren’s report was accurate. On 24 Oct. the Mass. Supreme Judicial Court opened its session at Taunton, protected by a militia force of 300 men commanded by Gen. David Cobb. They were opposed by 130 insurgents 487 armed with muskets and another fifty carrying clubs. Ultimately the rebels backed down and permitted the court to function (Massachusetts Centinel, 28 Oct.).

To John Adams from Thomas Jefferson, 23 October 1786 Jefferson, Thomas Adams, John

From Thomas Jefferson

Dear sir Paris Octr. 23d. 1786

Your favor of Sept. the 11th. came to hand in due time & since that I have recieved the copies of the Prussian treaty you were so kind as to send me. I have recieved a short letter from mr. Barclay dated Cadiz Sept. 25th. 1 only announcing his arrival there & that he should proceed immediately to Madrid. At this latter place he would meet my letter informing him that we did not propose any thing further with the Piratical states at this time. The inclosed extract of a letter from mr. Carmichael also mentions mr. Barclay’s arrival at Cadiz.2 A letter from mr. Carmichael some time ago informed me that a bill had been drawn on him by mrs. Lamb in America,3 by order as she said of mr Lamb; This gentleman not proposing to proceed either to New-York, London, or Paris to settle his accounts, I desired mr. Carmichael, if any money remained yet in the hands of mr. Lamb’s banker at Madrid, to obstruct its going out until he could give us information. His answer was that it was all withdrawn by mr. Lamb. By some means or other I omitted to mention these circumstances to you at the time. I mention them now to explain the reasons of mr. Carmichaels touching on that subject in the inclosed. We may now hourly expect from Mr. Barclay a copy of the preliminary treaty with Morocco. Is it your opinion that the definitive one should be executed through his agency, or that of Colo. Franks or of any other person? I beg you to present my most friendly respects to Mrs. Adams & to be assured yourself of the esteem & attachment with which I have the honor to be sir, your most obedient humble servant

Th: Jefferson (Test W Short sec)

RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr Adams”; endorsed: “Mr Jefferson”; notation: “Colo. Smith.”

Jefferson likely meant Thomas Barclay’s 26 Sept. letter, which he received on 14 Oct. (Jefferson, Papers , 10:403–404).

The extract was from William Carmichael’s 3 Oct. letter to Jefferson wherein he denounced the dubious qualifications of the “extremely zealous” John Lamb for the delicate task of negotiating the Algerian captives’ release (Jefferson, Papers , 10:427–429).

On 18 July Carmichael notified Jefferson that Lucy Bulkeley Lamb (b. 1749) of Norwich, Conn., had drawn £500 “by her husbands direction” (Jefferson, Papers , 10:150; William Richard Cutter, Genealogical and Family History of the State of Connecticut, 4 vols., N.Y., 1911, 2:953).

488