Papers of John Adams, volume 18

From John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 31 July 1786 Adams, John Jefferson, Thomas
To Thomas Jefferson
Dear Sir London July 31. 1786

I have recd, the Ratification of the Prussian Treaty, and next Thursday Shall Sett off for the Hague in order to exchange it with the Baron De Thulemeyer.

Your favour of the 11th. instant I have recd. There are great and weighty Considerations urged in it in favour of arming against the Algerines, and I confess, if our States could be brought to agree, in the Measure, I Should be very willing to resolve upon eternal War with them. But in Such a Case We ought to conduct the War with Vigour, and protect our Trade and People. The Resolution to fight them would raise the Spirits and Courage of our Countrymen immediately, and We might obtain the Glory of finally breaking up these nests of Banditti. But Congress will never, or at least not for years, take any Such Resolution, and in the meantime our Trade and Honour suffers beyond Calculation.— We ought not to fight them at all, unless We determine to fight them forever.

406

This thought is I fear, too rugged for our People to bear. to fight them at the Expence of Millions, and make Peace after all by giving more Money and larger Presents than would now procure, perpetual Peace, Seems not to be Œconomical.— Did Monsieur De Massae, carry his Point without making the Presents. Did Louis 14. obtain his Point without making the Presents? has not France made Presents ever Since? Did any Nation ever make Peace with any one Barbary State, without making the Presents? is there one Example of it? I believe not.— and fancy you will find that even Massae himself made the Presents.

I agree in Opinion of the Wisdom and Necessity of a Navy for other Uses, but am apprehensive it will only make bad worse with the Algerines. I will go all Lengths with you in promoting a Navy, whether to be applied to the Algerines or not. but I think at the Same time We should treat. Your Letter however has made me easier upon this Point.— Nevertheless I think you have rather undercalculated the Force necessary to humble the Algerines. They have now fifty Gun Boats, which being Small objects in Smooth Water against great Ships in rough Water are very formidable. None of these existed in the time of Monsieur Massae. The Harbour of Algiers too is fortified all round, which it was not, in Mr Massaes time, which renders it more difficult and dangerous to attempt a Blockade.

I know not what dependence is to be had upon Portugal and Naples, in Case of a War with the Barbarians. perhaps they might assist us, in some degree.—

Blocking Algiers would not obtain Peace with Morocco Tunis or Tripoli, so that our Commerce would still be exposed.

After all, tho I am glad We have exchanged a Letter upon the subject, I percieve that neither Force nor Money will be applied. our States are so backward that they will do nothing for some Years. if they get Money enough to discharge the Demands upon them in Europe, already incurred, I shall be agreably disappointed.— A Disposition Seems rather to prevail among our Citizens to give up all Ideas of Navigation and naval Power, and lay themselves consequently at the Mercy of Foreigners, even for the Price of their Produce.— It is their Concern, and We must submit. for your Plan of fighting will no more be adopted than mine of negotiating.— This is more humiliating to me, than giving the Presents would be.

I have a Letter from Mr Jay of 7. July, by Packet, containing 407 nothing but an Acknowledgment of the Receipt of our Letter of 25. of April.—1

N. Hampshire and R. Island have suspended their Navigation Acts and Massachusetts now left alone will suspend theirs, so that all will be left to the Convention, whose system if they form one, will not be compleated adopted and begin to operate under Several years.—

Congress have recd the Answer which you saw, to my Memorial of 30 Nov. and Mr Ramsay writes me,2 he is not distressed at it, because it will produce a repeal of all the Laws, against recovering private Debts.

With every Sentiment of Friendship I am / yours

John Adams

RC (DLC:Jefferson Papers); internal address: “Mr Jefferson.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 112.

1.

For John Jay’s 7 July letter (Adams Papers), see his 6 June letter, note 4, above.

2.

Jefferson had presumably seen the Marquis of Carmarthen’s 28 Feb. reply during his visit to London in March and April. David Ramsay’s letter was of 14 May, above.

From John Adams to John Lamb, 31 July 1786 Adams, John Lamb, John
To John Lamb
Sir— London july 31st 1786

Mr Randall who proposes to Sail in a few Days for N York, will deliver you this Letter.1 If, I have not Overlookd any Article in your Account you have drawn Bills upon me which have been accepted & paid to the amount of 32 hundred and 12 Pounds 12 shillings Sterling for the Expenditure of which you will Account with Congress and pay the Ballance into their Treasury after paying Mr Randall his Salery. The Articles of Extra Expence for Cloathing I think Should be allowed to Mr Randall exclusive of his Salary2

If it Should not be the intention of Congress to treat farther with the Algerines every Man of Humanity must feel for our unfortunate Countrymen in Captivity and at Least it ought to be publickly known whether Congress mean to make any provision for their Comfort in the Articles of Subsistance & Cloathing that their Relations and Friends may do the Best in their Power. You will do well to represent this matter to Government, that they may give Instructions to their Ministers what to do in it— I am fully of your opinion of the Policy of treating with the Barbary Powers: but if Congress Should determine against it, they will I presume prepare a Naval 408 Force to give some Protection to their Commerce and Portugal at least will Cooperate with us perhaps Naples will do so too—

I am Sir yours &c &c—

LbC in AA2’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr Lamb—”; APM Reel 113.

1.

In both this letter and the one to John Jay of 31 July, above, JA assumed that Lamb would reach America before Paul R. Randall or shortly thereafter. But it was not until 5 Aug. 1787 that Lamb reached Boston, announcing his arrival in a letter to Jay of that date. Jay enclosed Lamb’s letter with his to Congress of 17 Aug. 1787, which Congress read on 20 Sept. (PCC, No. 91, f. 539–540; JCC , 33:506).

2.

For Randall’s salary, see JA’s 31 July 1786 letter to Jay, and note 2, above. With regard to Lamb’s accounts, he wrote to Jay on 10 April 1788 indicating that he had arrived in New York and was ready to resolve any issues remaining from his mission. Jay recommended to Congress that the letter be referred to the Board of Treasury, but nothing further has been found regarding it ( JCC , 34:129, 132).