Papers of John Adams, volume 18

From John Adams to Robert Murdoch, 4 July 1786 Adams, John Murdoch, Robert
To Robert Murdoch
Sir London July 4. 1786

I am no stranger to the case of the unfortunate Alexander Grosse in whose favour You did me the honor to write me your Letter from Dunkirk of the 30th. June,1 I lately received from His Excellency James Bowdoin Esqr Governor of the Massachusetts an Application from the friends of Mr. Grosse, which as I was desired, I communicated to the Comte D’Adhemar, who has transmitted it to the Comte De Vergennes. I since received a Letter from a Captain Green at Rotterdam relative to the subject, which I have transmitted to Mr. Jefferson Minister Plenipotentiary from the United States of America at the Court of France—

It is not the Custom, for Governments to redeem hostages 374 excepting such as were pledged by themselves, it is not, therefore in my power nor in that of Mr. Jefferson’s to redeem Mr. Grosse. but in this case the Captors for their own Interest should discharge him, since there is no hope, nor scarce a Probability that the Ransom or any part of it, should ever be paid— it is better to loose what is past, than to add continually to the Loss, although it be but a British shilling a day—

Mr. Grosse would do well to write to Mr. Jefferson at Paris—and desire him to speak to the Ministers at Versailles, and if any thing can be done, with propriety, it will be, nevertheless, I believe that Government will not interfere, unless the Captors should throw upon them the Expence of the Maintenance of the Hostage, in which Case they may sett him at Liberty— The Captors I believe will find themselves obliged to carry this affair to account of profit & loss & poor Grosse himself, must probably sett down 7 Years of his Life as annihlated, it is the fortune of War—

Your

J. A—

LbC in WSS’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr. Robert Murdock / Dunkerque.”; APM Reel 113.

1.

Murdoch’s 30 June letter (Adams Papers) is virtually identical to his letter to Thomas Jefferson of the same date (Jefferson, Papers , 10:79–80). But see also letters from James Bowdoin of 10 April and Griffin Greene of 18 June, both above.

From John Adams to James Warren, 4 July 1786 Adams, John Warren, James
To James Warren
Dear Sir London July 4. 1786

Your Favour of 30. April, is arrived. I am Surprized to read in your Letter that “our Poverty cant relieve Us from the Piracies of the Algerines.”1 Are the thirteen United States then not worth two or three hundred Thousand Guineas? Suppose they borrow it at Six per Cent. there will be Eighteen thousand Guineas to pay Yearly. We now loose a Million sterling a Year, by this War.— Are We able to loose a Million and not pay Eighteen Thousand Pounds? Give Congress Power and let them lay on Duties upon Imports or Exports upon thirteen states Sufficient to pay this Interest and you may borrow the Money. But I never heard or read of sluggards, who saw so many fantastical Lions in the Way, as our People appear to have Seen Since the Peace.—

Our Oil may find a Market in every City where a Lamp is burn’d in the night, if our Merchants will take Pains by Samples and 375 Experiments to Shew the Inhabitants the Superiour Qualities of our Sperma Cæti Oil.

The Picture you draw of the Ruin of the Country is horrible.— Bad as it may be, Paper Money or a suspension of Law Processes, I will venture to say would make it much worse.— I cannot be of your Opinion that there is “a total Change in Principles and manners” “nor that Interest is the only Pursuit,” “nor that Riches only are respected.” If you look back to the Year 1760 and from thence to 1774, You will find that Interest was courted and Riches respected, by as many, as they were during the War, and during the War by as many, as since the Peace.— as great a Number of, Men of Merit, who are poor are respected now, as were respected at any time Since our Memory. it is most certain that our Countrymen, are not and never were, Spartans in their Contempt of Weath, and I will go farther and Say they ought not to be. Such a Trait in their Character would render them lazy Drones, unfit for the Agriculture Manufactures Fisheries, and Commerce, and Population of their Country: and fit only for War. I am never apprehensive of Anarchy, because I know there is Wisdom and Address enough to prevent it.

All Things must tend to restore publick Faith & Confidence. The Debt must be funded and the Interest paid. This will put an End to that Speculation in public Paper, which now employs all the Capitals, and produce a Circulation that will releive every Distress.2

The Encyclopædia is a valuable Collection of Knowledge and worth the Money. The Gentlemans Pocket Farrier and Truslers practical Husbandry, I will endeavour to send you. You may pay Dr Tufts for them.

The Enthusiasm for Agriculture like Virtue will be its own Reward. may it run & be glorified.

I have given my Daughter to Col. Smith a Man of Merit formed in the School of his Countries Afflictions. I Shall want her Company, in my old Age, but the Conveniences of Parents are not the principal Points to be consulted, in the Marriages of Children. The young Couple appear to be very happy, and may they continue so as long as they live.

To return to Politicks, Our Countrymen are not yet informed of the magical Effects of Circulation, and of the ruin of Stagnation.— Stagnation must exist and Circulation can never take Place in Society where there is not Confidence of the Members in the Public & in one Another. This Confidence never will be restored, untill the Debt is funded and all Apprehensions of Paper Knavery is 376 annihilated. The only Way and the effectual Way to restore our affairs is for every Wise & good Man to Unite in restoring Confidence in the Publick.

With great Esteem & regard, I am dear sir / your most obedient & humble sert—

John Adams

RC (MHi:Warren-Adams Papers); internal address: “General Warren.”; endorsed: “Mr J. Adams.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 113.

1.

Here and elsewhere in this letter JA paraphrases rather than quotes passages from Warren’s 30 April letter, above. Warren’s letter was not unusual for its pessimism regarding the state of America in general and Massachusetts in particular, but JA’s impatience with and criticism of Warren’s views is more pointed here than in previous letters. For Warren’s reaction to JA’s comments, see his 22 Oct. reply, below. For AA’s comments regarding the Warrens and James Warren’s political career, see Mercy Otis Warren’s 8 April letter, note 2, above.

2.

Compare JA’s response to Warren here with his 12 Dec. 1785 letter to Richard Cranch, above, regarding the economic problems facing Massachusetts that would ultimately result in Shays’ Rebellion.