Papers of John Adams, volume 18

To John Adams from John Jay, 4 May 1786 Jay, John Adams, John
From John Jay
Dear Sir New York 4 May 1786 1

I have been favored with your Letter in which you mention Mr Warren.2 Your opinion of that Gentleman, added to the Merits of his Family, cannot fail to operate powerfully in his Favor. I have communicated that Letter to Mr King, an able & valuable Delegate from Massachusets; who I have Reason to think wishes well to you, and to all who like You, deserve well of their Country.

our Friend Gerry has retired from Congress with a charming amiable Lady, whom he married here. I regret his absence, for he discharged the Trust reposed in him with great Fidelity, & with more 279 Industry and persevering Attention than many are distinguished by. Mr King has also married a Lady of merit, and the only child of Mr Alsop, who was in Congress with us in 1774. I am pleased with these Intermarriages—they tend to assimilate the States, and to promote one of the first Wishes of my Heart vizt. to see the People of america become one Nation in every Respect— for as to the separate Legislatures, I would have them considered with Relation to the Confederacy, in the same Light, in which Counties stand to the State of which they are parts—vizt merely as Districts to facilitate the purposes of domestic order, & good Governmt.— With great & sincere Regard I am / Dr Sr. your most obt. & hble Servt

John Jay—

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Honb. John Adams Esqr.

1.

In a third letter of this date (MHi:Waterston Coll.), Jay replied to JA’s second 4 Jan. letter, above, concerning his meeting with John Moore, archbishop of Canterbury, about the ordination of American Protestant Episcopal bishops. Jay indicated that he had communicated the contents of the letter to Rev. Samuel Provoost, rector of Trinity Church in New York City, who appreciated JA’s effort. Jay hoped that the first general Episcopal convention in the United States would succeed in its appeal to the Church of England so as to diminish the influence of Rev. Samuel Seabury, bishop of Connecticut, who had opposed the Revolution (vol. 17:562).

2.

Jay refers to JA’s second letter of 3 Dec. 1785, above.

To John Adams from Rufus King, 4 May 1786 King, Rufus Adams, John
From Rufus King
Sir, New York 4. May 1786.

By the January Packet I was honored with your letter of the 23. of December, and by Mr. Anstey who arrived in the February Packet, I received your’s of the 22. of January: I pray you to accept my acknowledgments for these Kind attentions, and to be assured that if any communications in my power concerning our common country, will afford you any information, the pleasure of transmitting them, will be my best and most satisfactory reward— Long before this time, the Dispatches from Mr. Jay’s Office will have convinced you that Congress entertain the same sentiments, which you possess, on the Subject of an exchange of ministers between the United States & G. Britain—; they will not be inattentive to the Dignity of their country, nor the Etiquette of courts— Mr. Temple will be confined to the authorities of his commission, & will not be permitted to travel out of his consulate— The Determination is, that the court of St. James must send a minister here of your Rank in consequence of the proposal for that purpose, or congress must recall their minister at London.

280

Although it is admitted by every one, that the Duties of your legation have been ably discharged, yet it seems to be as generally allowed, that little good can be expected, in the present disposition of the British ministry from the continuation of a minister from our country at the British Court— on this Subject congress will be very temperate, and nothing will be decided hastily— there certainly was a Time since the war when there existed a very general disposition in America to be intimately allied with the country of your present Residence— that disposition has since Changed, is now universally weakened, and in several parts of America does not now exist—

Whether the measures pursued in the British Cabinet, and which have produced this change in America, were best calculated to advance the prosperity of Great Britain or America, a short futurity will determine— certain it is, that they have a tendency to produce that Unanimity in America so much to be desired, as the Basis of those national Regulations, which alone can establish our commerce, and make our country respectable— indeed they have in some sort already produced this good Object— the arrets of France relative to the Cod Fishery tend to the same purpose— America begins to learn, that she must depend upon herself, for Prosperity & Happiness—

with perfect respect—I have the honor to / be your obt. & very Hb̃le Servt:

Rufus King

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Exy. J. Adams Esq. &c &c &c”; endorsed: “Mr King. 4. May. / ansd. 14. June. / 1786.”