Papers of John Adams, volume 18

To John Adams from John van Heukelom & Son, 27 April 1786 John van Heukelom & Son Adams, John
From Jan van Heukelom & Zoon
Honoráble Sir. Leyden 27 April 1786

Oúr distressed Sitúation on the one Side, and the Manÿ Civilities & friendlÿ regard Which ÿoúr Excellençÿ bestowed on ús on the other, make ús So free to implore ÿoúr Kind assistance: We dailÿ lament of having Sent anÿ goods to America, We cannot get anÿ accoúnts or remittances ever Since Several Years: and as Mr. Cranch wrote ús, he woúld be glad to get rid of the whole búsiness, we invested Mr. dúncan Ingraham Júnior With oúr power of attorneÿ, to take all oúr búsiness into his hands. bút as Mr Cranch entrústed the whole búsiness to â third Person, whó Left boston, everÿ thing Concerning oúr Propertÿ is So Confúsed, that we have reason to fear immense Losses:1 We are however únwilling to troúble ÿoúr Excellencÿ, With particúlarities, and We’ll Spare all Complaints on this point, as these Úndertakings where all done for oúr own risk:— it is more particúlarlÿ to Mr. Barclay’s unaccountable behavioúr, that We 272 múst impúte oúr distressed Sitúation, which has plúnged Mÿ Father in â most fatal Melancholÿ disorder, whose Conseqúences may be dreadfúll:

on the Subject of Mr. Barclaÿ, We wrote the inclosed letter to his Excellencÿ Ths: Jefferson Esqr. at Paris; bút not having received anÿ answer,2 and being informed, that he is in London: We take the libertÿ to Send â Copÿ of it inclosed joining to it Mr Barclay’s âccount Cúrrent With ús: Where is Mr. Barclaÿ? he left Paris clandestinelÿ, withoút informing anÿ Person whom We Know of the place of his abode. if he be alive we Súrelÿ ought to Know where to address him:

We introdúced Mr. Barclaÿ to â Merchant at Haarlem from whom he boúght for aboút 10,000 florins on the Same Credit of â twelve Month: this Gentleman, enraged bÿ Mr. Barclay’s Condúct, and Considering him as â Man who bÿ clandestinelÿ getting awaÿ from the place of his residence, Shews ân intention not to troúble himself Múch aboút his Creditors; wants to Expose Mr. Barclaÿ’s Condúct to the world in all public papers, as â fellow for Whom everÿ man ought to be warned: We have done all, which was in oúr power to prevent it, tho’ certainlÿ Mr. Barclaÿs Condúct is unexcusable; and we have prevailed on them to Subside with it for Some time, Engaging ourselves to úse everÿ possible means to procúre them Some information and Certaintÿ: Indeed Mr. Barclaÿ, Who alwaÿs professed to be â Man of Propertÿ, who wrote ús in 1783 that he had Send Mr Loreihle to Philadelphia to Collect his propertÿ to the amount of more than 800,000 Livres & transmit it; he coúld easilÿ transfer â part of that propertÿ, as â Súritÿ on the names of his Creditors if he intended to paÿ them.

it is in this miserable State of úncertaintÿ that we address your Excellencÿ imploring ÿoúr Kind assistance and advice how to disengage ús from this fatal affair.

We hope your Excellencÿ Will not denÿ ús the favoúr of an Answer which we Expect the Sooner the better remaining With great respect. / Honorable Sir / Your Most obedient Servts

John van Heúkelom & Son

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “To His Excellencÿ J: Adams Esqr. Minister Plenipoten- / tiarÿ of the United States of America. / in / London.”; endorsed: “Mr Van heukelom / 27. April 1786.”; and by WSS: “Leyden.”

1.

In 1782, Richard Cranch contracted to sell cloth and other goods on the firm’s behalf. But four years later, most of the “very unsalable articles” remained unsold, as foreign goods glutted the American market (vol. 13:141, 142; AFC , 6:54–55, 163, 236–237).

273 2.

The enclosure, not found, was likely a copy of the Leyden mercantile firm’s 1 March 1786 letter to Thomas Jefferson, in which it sought to collect an overdue debt of 25,000 florins arising from the 1782 sale of cloth and other goods to Thomas Barclay (Jefferson, Papers , 9:308–310). The firm alleged that Barclay had repeatedly avoided payment and that he owed another 10,000 florins to colleagues in a Haarlem silk manufacturing firm. JA replied to Heukelom & Zoon on 21 May 1786, stating only that Barclay had left France on a diplomatic mission and would return “in a few months” (LbC, APM Reel 113).

To John Adams from James Warren, 30 April 1786 Warren, James Adams, John
From James Warren
Dear Sir, Milton April 30th: 1786

I was a few days ago honoured with your favour of the 12th: of Decr. I am much Obliged to you for your Attention to my Son & your favourable, if not partial opinion of the Merits of his Family. Winslow left Lisbon, & returned Home last fall: after a disagreable residence there for more than Twelve months, at a great Expence, fully convinced of the futility of Court promises, which his former Experience could no longer Justify any future dependence upon.1 it has been my opinion that Consuls should be appointed in several of the European Ports, & perticularly at Lisbon where we have had a great Trade till Interrupted by the Algerine Corsairs. no resource is so natural & beneficial for the supply of that great Branch of Business the Fishery as the Trade with Lisbon, & Cadiz, & I can scarcely Conceive how it can be supported without it, unless by a dependence on foreigners for the Importation, which must defeat all the policy of our Navigation Acts, however founded in Policy or oeconomy. How we are to be relieved from the Injury of these Pirates I am at a loss to determine. their Generosity will not do it, & our Poverty cant, & if it is not done the Fishery & Trade must be depressed and discouraged. You who are acquainted with the Means the Agents to Algiers are possessd. of, can Judge of their prospects of Success. I can only wish them Success.

I can form some Idea of the difficulty & delays of your Treaties, which render their Completion uncertain even to the best Informed. The Trade with Britain if it has been attended with some loss & disappointment to them has almost ruined us: & with their own conduct may Justify a severe Navigation Act, with regard to them, but I am not so well satisfied of the propriety of it with regard to any other Nation, tho’ I think the policy of the French in their dutys on our Fish, & the Bountys on their own very Absurd. I wish I could see, for the Benefit of Mankind a fair Experiment made, of a Goverment supported without Duties or Bounties, at least that they 274 should operate, only as prohibitions or severe restrictions, without any regard to a revenue. in that Case even those in question might not have Existed.

if our oil can find a Market in France it will I think disconcert the views of the British Ministery, & be very Advantageous to us, as well as to the Commerce of France I took great pains to Impress the Marquiss de Fayate with proper Sentiments on that subject when here last, & have reason from his Letters to suppose it has had a good Effect2

I know you wish to be Informed of the situation of your beloved Country. it would give me pleasure to gratify you. in former Times when you was absent I used to attempt it, but it is now so Novel & so Extraordinary that I dare not Undertake the Task. The constant drain of Specie to make remittances for Baubles Imported from England is so great as to Occasion an Extreem Scarcity: Commerce is ruined: & what is worse, the husbandry & Manufactures of the Country cannot be supported. the only Branch of Business that promises any success is the Fishery, & that is greatly Injured from the same Cause. No Debts Can be paid, or Taxes Collected. the first are severely demanded, by multiplyed Law suits. the last are become more necessary than ever by the wants of the public: our General Court sets often & long, do little & give no satisfaction to their Constituents— Paper Money, Tenders of Lands &c. suspension of Law processes, & a variety of Expedients are proposed, & Nothing Adopted. a Total Change in principles & Manners, Interest is the great object, the only pursuit, and Riches only respected. every thing seems verging to Confusion, & anarchy, & certainly great Wisdom & Address are necessary to prevent it. Our Elections have been much the same this as the last Year. indeed when a Man is once in it is for Life. a repetition annually is nugatory few Attend the Meetings & hardly any Enquired further than who was in last, & Vote for him again without the trouble of recuring to Principles, or traceing Consequences.3

Be assured No Body Can Wish you & Family more happiness, or desire more to see you in the Vicinity than your Friends on Milton Hill. make our Compliments to Mrs. Adams & Love to Nabby. I am / Your Friend & Servt

Jas: Warren

will you give me your Opinion of the Encyclopedia, & whether it be worth purchaseing—4

275

if it would not be an Impertinent request to a minister of State, I would ask the favour to send me the Gentn. pocket Farrier & Trusler, practical Husbandry.5 I will pay the Cost to your order here, R Baldwin Pater Noster Row. a Charming Enthusiasm is prevailing for Agriculture

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams Esqr”; endorsed: “G. Warren / Ap. 30. Ansd. July 4. / 1786.”

1.

Despite acquiring letters of recommendation from JA and Thomas Jefferson for the American consulship at Lisbon, Winslow Warren returned to Milton in mid-Dec. 1785. Within a year, Warren was imprisoned for debt in Hartford, Conn., and his legal and financial difficulties dragged on until his death in 1791 ( AFC , 7:104, 111, 152, 401, 432).

2.

The letters from the Marquis de Lafayette to James Warren have not been found.

3.

Warren here depicts the economic problems facing Massachusetts that by July 1786 would result in the outbreak of Shays’ Rebellion. His comments are similar to, although less detailed than, those by Richard Cranch in his 13 Oct. 1785 letter (vol. 17:505–510). JA’s replies of 12 Dec. 1785 to Cranch, above, and 4 July 1786 to Warren, below, are similar in attributing the issues raised by the two men to the inevitable aftermath of war, as had been the case in 1763 following the end of the Seven Years’ War.

4.

Denis Diderot, Encyclopédie, ou, Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, Geneva, 1778–1779.

5.

Warren refers to John Trusler, Practical Husbandry; or, The Art of Farming, with a Certainty of Gain: As Practised by Judicious Farmers in This Country, London, 1780, and William Burdon, The Gentleman’s Pocket-Farrier, London, 1780.