Papers of John Adams, volume 18

From John Adams to the Marquis de Lafayette, 21 January 1786 Adams, John Lafayette, Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier, marquis de
To the Marquis de Lafayette
Dear Sir Grosr. sqr. 21st. Jany. 86

I am very glad to learn by your Kind favour of the 9th. 1 that Boylston has sold his oil to sangrains Correspondent because this will both shew the Bostonians that a Markett may be found in france, much better than in England, & the Parrissians that this oil is much better & Cheaper than any other

Mr. Barretts Contract bids fair to compleat the business & to introduce a regular Exchange of American for french productions— The french Nation cannot be interested in their Whaling Company so much, as they are in their general productions of agriculture and manufactures.— It is very pleasing to hear, that our naval stores & pot-ash have an undisputed Reputation and you may depend upon it that our timber, and masts will very soon, vindicate themselves from all the English slanders— I wish I had a Copy of Mr. Jefferson’s Letter upon tobacco— Brant is come for half pay, as it is given out— I believe his hopes of scalps at present is lost in the fear of loosing his own—

I will look up the writings you desire against the slavery of negroes, & send them by the first good oppertunity— The Laws passed in America are not to be found here— Mr. Howard is now, as I am told by my friend Dr. Price, at Marsailles—

there is not a possibility of forming an adequate Idea, of what is passing in the News papers, in this town without taking 7— or 8— of them daily— You find yourself encumbered in the Course of a few Day’s with an enormous pile of waste paper—which contains nothing of any value, tho’ it Cost you a large sum of Money—2

110

The morning Cronicle is the best for parliamentary debates, but is good for little else. The light Troops of the Ministry skirmish in the morning post—those of opposition in the Morning herald—but there is little in either but the battles of the sons of dulness—

tell Anastasia she must prepare herself to let papa go— there will not be time to wait for George to grow up—according to the latest advices—3

Mr. Hancock is president of Congress & in his absence Mr. Ramsay of So. Carolina fills the Chair— Mr. Temples Commission was before Congress, but not determined on, at the date of my Letter from Mr. Jay of the 26th. of Novr. 4

The ensuing season of parliament will be stormy opposition will have materials enough & ministry will be pressed from various quarters—

The taxes the last year have been very productive, and Mr. Pitt is purse proud, but in the opinion of the deepest men he is too sanguine, in presuming that the next Year, will be equally prosperous—

If france—the Emperor & America persevere, he will be terribly disappointed— The British Empire is now in the power of its Rivals, who will be weak indeed, if they again contribute to build it up to a dangerous height—

It was very pleasant the other day to see at the drawing room, how all Nations were of one blood, dwelling together in Love— there was Colonel Smith, and his Royal Majesty King Brant, who had been so lately in action against each other in the Wilderness—5 Brants Phisiognomy was much admired by the Ladies— They saw a remarkable goodness in his Countenance & I suppose were amused with that harmless play thing—his hatchett, in another part of the Room were seen the American Ambassador & King Pascall Paoli, in a familiar Conversation with each other—6 Who can immagine a more striking scene of gratification for Philanthropy

The Ladies are very sensible of your politeness and desire me to convey their best respects to you & Madam Lafayette & their affectionate remembrance of the little family—

I am Dr. sir

J. A.

LbC in WSS’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Marquis De Lafayette”; APM Reel 113.

1.

The RC of Lafayette’s 9 Jan. letter has not been found, probably because JA enclosed it with his 22 Jan. letter to Rufus King, below, but see the extract of the 9 Jan. letter, above.

2.

In this paragraph, and the following three JA appears to be responding to comments by Lafayette about acquiring London 111 newspapers, about leaving his family for some purpose, and possibly about John Temple’s arrival in America, but no such material appears in the extract.

3.

For a miniature of Lafayette’s children, Anastasie, Georges Washington, and Marie Antoinette Virginie, see AFC , 6:viii–ix, 68, 71.

4.

Vol. 17:606–607.

5.

In Aug. 1779, Joseph Brant and Maj. John Butler unsuccessfully led a joint force to block Maj. Gen. John Sullivan’s troops, including WSS, near Newtown (now Elmira), N.Y. Sullivan’s army destroyed multiple Iroquois villages in pursuit ( AFC , 7:45; ANB ).

6.

Gen. Filippo Antonio Pasquale Paoli (1725–1807), former president of Corsica, succeeded in drafting a national constitution and founding a merchant navy, a mint, and an official press before a French invasion forced him into exile in Britain in 1769. A perennial favorite of London’s literatti, Paoli failed to make an impression on AA2. On 30 Jan. 1786 she wrote to JQA that “he appears to be about sixty years of age, light Complexion red Hair, and discovers no simtoms of greatness, or Extraordinary quallities” ( DNB ; AFC , 7:16).

From John Adams to the Comte de Sarsfield, 21 January 1786 Adams, John Sarsfield, Guy Claude, Comte de
To the Comte de Sarsfield
Dear Sir— Grosvenor square Jany. 21st. 1786

If I were as fortunate as you are and could pass the Water from Dover to Calais in 3 hours, I would go to Paris & dine with you in some of your American Parties but I can never get over from Harwich to Helveot nor from Dover to Calais in less than 17 hours, & sometimes not under three Day’s—

I have all the peices relative to the United Provinces excepting Le Pay’s de Drenthe. I have one peice upon slavery—one upon Woemen, & two introductions to the subject of fiefs. Voila tout que J’en ai—1

Among all my acquaintance I know not a greater Rider of Hobby Horses than Count Sarsefield— one of your Hobby Horses is to assemble uncommon Characters— I have dined with you 2 or 3. times at your House in Company with the oddest Collections of Personages that were ever put together— I am thinking if you were here, I would Invite you to a dinner to your taste— I would ask King Paoli— King Brant—Le Chevaleir DeEon,2 & if you pleased you might have Mr. & Mrs. ——— with whom you dined in America—3 How much speculation would this whimsical association afford you?—

How goes on your Enquiry into fiefs? if you do not make haste I may perhaps interfere with you I have half a Mind to devote the next ten Years to the making of a Book, upon the subject of Nobility— I wish to enquire into the practice of all Nations ancient & modern, civilized & savage, under all Religions Mahometan, Christian, & Pagan—to see how far the division of Mankind into Patricians & Plebeians, Nobles & simples is necessary & inevitable & how far it is not Nature has not made this discrimination. art has done it— Art may then prevent it— I believe would it do good or evil 112 to prevent it? I believe good think what you will of it— How can it be prevented? in short it is a splendid subject and if I were not too Lazy I would undertake it.

I want to see Nations in Uniform— No Church Canonicals: no Lawyers Robes—no ——— no distinctions in society, but such as sense and Honesty make.— What a fool? what an Enthusiast you will say— what then? why should not I have my Hobby Horse to ride as well as my friend— I’ll tell you what— I believe this many headed beast the people, will some time or other have wit enough to throw their riders—and if the should they will put an End to an Abundance of tricks with which they are now curbed & bitted, whiped & spurred

J. A—

LbC in WSS’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Count Sarsefield”; APM Reel 113.

1.

See Sarsfield’s query in his 8 Jan. letter, and note 1, above.

2.

The Chevalier Charles de Beaumont d’Eon (1728–1810) was a noted French diplomat and writer on history and government who often dressed in women’s clothes. AA2 reported his arrival in London in Nov. 1785 and asked JQA if he had ever heard “of the famouss Mademoiselle d’eon” ( AFC , 6:472, 474).

3.

Probably William Bingham and Anne Willing Bingham. In his 8 Jan. 1786 letter Sarsfield indicated that he, metaphorically, had dined with them twice in “Amerique” and that they were about to depart Paris for London.