Papers of John Adams, volume 16

Charles Spener to John Adams, 28 February 1784 Spener, Charles Adams, John
From Charles Spener
Sir Berlin this 28 february 1784.

May it please Your Excellence to give a kind reception to the historical Almanack for the Year 1784. which I, this Year for the first time published upon a plan intirely new, & of which I have the honour to present to Your Excellency the annexed copy.1

Being intended to point out & to set in their proper light the most remarkable incidents, who, in the space of every last year, have happened in the political history of states as well as in the litterary way, relating to interesting discoveries in useful arts—being calculated upon a plan of such general utility, my almanac for the present year is solely dedicated to the Revolution of North-America &, by consequence, particularly entitled to being taken notice of by Your Excellence.

The historical part of it is done by one Mr. Sprengel, Professor of history in one of our best Universities (at Halle) who hath a very good reputation both, as historian & as writer.2 The cuts are executed by our most eminent artists. If they do not wholly answer the object they represent, Your Excellence will excuse it partly on account of their small size, which gave no room to great compositions, 68 partly on account of the want of exact knowledge of local circumstances. To get some information about them is one of the secondary objects of the present letter.

The annexed sketch of the contents of the historical Almanack for 1785 will show to Your Excellence, which of the latest events in North-America I pointed out as the most remarkable & the most able of being represented. In submitting to Your Excellency’s deeper knowledge of American affairs & better judgement of them, I humbly sollicit Your Excellency’s kind decision, “whether You approve of my choosing out of the latest history of the united states, the following transactions, namely:” General Washington’s being sum̃oned by the Congress to become the Legislator of America. & the foundation of (or rather the Surveying of a track of land, chosen for building there upon) a Town for the meeting of the Congress or whether there happened in North America, lately some events more interesting & equally fit of being represented in cuts.3

In either of these two cases I hereby implore Your Excellency’s gracious assistance, partly in communicating to me such papers as will convey a complete & authentic notion of the fact, partly in giving directions for the artists in order that, their designs may not be quite of their own fancy but approach nature as much as possible. I intirely disapprove, for instance, the Session of the Congress as represented in one of the cuts of this Years Almanack. In the first place there were at that period not 13 as represented here, but 53 delegates present, and tho all of them could not be brought in so small a room as this cut, yet the form of their seats, should, I fancy, have been altered. I imagine they have a circular form, the Presidents place some what elevated & so on.4

Please Your Excellence to correct these & similar mistakes & to prevent future one’s either by minute descriptions or by Some slight sketch; in the latter case some few strokes of pencil lead will be quite sufficient.

As in the composition of this historical Almanack, North-America will always have a very considerable & very interesting share any notion Your Excellence will please to com̃unicate to me, they may consist in general views upon North-American affairs, new regulations for trade, manufacturys, fishery, the troops, legislature, &c. or in relations of remarkable facts—will be most thankfully received & most faithfully made use of, to the glory of the united states & to the instruction & admiration of our part of the globe.

To proceed in the Gallery of famous Americans I essentially want 69 Your Excellency’s Portrait. The highest favour therefore, You could bestow upon me, would be the communicating to me Your Excellency’s picture drawn from life. If there exists any good painting from which it might be copied, this shall be done here by one of the ablest hands & the painting returned soon & in the best condition. If there does not exist any painting, I beg leave to have Your Excellency’s head drawn there, for the aforesaid purpose, by a reputable artist.

Lastly I submitt the annexed Portrait of the late President Hancok, to Your Excellency’s inspection & wish to be informed, whether it really resembles the famous man it represents (what I doubt of) if consequently I can have it copied or if there is means to get a better one, this being taken from Mr. Hilliard d’Auberteuil’s a french historian’s Memoires sur les Anglo-Americains. 5 President Laurens hath graciously promised me the head of Mr. Payne; but, having not yet seen any thing of it, I hereby ask whether it is likewise in Your Excellency’s possession & if You would spare it some weecks for the purpose of being copied.

May the wellfare of North-America be as everlasting as will be the fame of those eminent politicians, who took so considerable a part in supporting & settling its rights, & amongst whom Your Excellency occupy so distinguished a place— May this Almanac, considered as an hom̃age offered to liberty, from the bottom of despotism, be judged not unworthy Your Excellency’s protection & promotion— May the boldness of my adressing Your Excellence in a language, which, by the shortness of my former Stay in England, I learned but very imperfectly, be graciously overlooked by Your Excellence— I am, with the utmost respect, Your Excellency’s / most humble & devoted Servant

Charles Spener Bookseller to his Majesty

RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Charles Spener / Berlin 28. Feb. / ansd 24. March. / 1784.” For the enclosure, see note 3, below.

1.

This is Matthias Christian Sprengel, Allgemeines Historisches Taschenbuch, oder Abriss der merkwürdigsten neuen Welt-Begebenheiten: enthaltend für 1784 die Geschichte der Revolution von Nord-America, Berlin, [1783], published by the firm of Haude and Spener. The copy sent by Spener is not in JA’s library at MB. Despite Spener’s efforts to collect materials and obtain JA’s advice, no volume of the almanac for 1785 was published.

2.

Matthias Christian Sprengel (1746–1803), professor of history and librarian at the University of Halle since 1778, recently had published his analysis of the war in North America and its consequences for Britain and France, Ueber den Jetzigen Nordamerikanischen Krieg und dessen Folgen für England und Frankreich, Leipzig, 1782, which likely led Spener to recruit him to write on the Anglo-American conflict for the almanac (Rochus von Liliencron and others, eds., Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, 56 vols., Leipzig, 1875–1912).

70 3.

The enclosed “Tableau des Gravures dont sera orné l’Almanac historique pour l’Année 1785” indicated that the work would contain seven sections on European events and two, which Spener quotes, on American events: George Washington as “le legislateur de l’Amerique” and the establishment of a federal city on the banks of the Delaware. For JA’s comments thereon, see his reply of 24 March 1784, below. Spener also indicated that he planned to include a “Gallerie des grands hommes de l’Amérique” that would include portraits of Thomas Paine, John Hancock, and JA.

4.

For the almanac’s depiction of Congress in session, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 2, above.

5.

This is Michel René Hilliard d’Auberteuil’s Essais historiques et politiques sur les Anglo-Américains, 2 vols., Brussels, 1781–1782. The portrait of Hancock is in vol. 1, between p. 152 and 153. For JA’s opinion of the likeness, see his reply of 24 March, below.

John Adams to Mason Locke Weems, 3 March 1784 Adams, John Weems, Mason Locke
To Mason Locke Weems
Sir. The Hague March 3d: 1784.

I have receiv’d the Letter you did me the Honour to write me, under the Cover of my Friend Mr: Johnson, and however dangerous it maybe for an American Minister of State, to intermeddle, in a matter of Religion especially without Orders from his Superiors, I think I can neither transgress nor give Offence, by rendering you any Service in my Power, as a private Citizen, in a matter of so serious Concern1

In the United Provinces of the Low Countries, there are no Diocesan Bishops, nor any higher order of Clergy than Presbyters. The Dutch Church is wholly Presbyterian, and therefore you cannot obtain Ordination by coming here. In Sweeden and Denmark there are Lutheran Bishops, but whatt Articles of Faith it may be necessary to Subscribe or what Liturgy to adopt, I am not informed. I believe that Consubstantiation at least, is among their Creeds. By what Laws or Usages of their Country these Protestant Bishops may be bound, I know not.

His Excellency the Baron de Nolken, Ambassador of the King of Sweeden to the Court of St: James’s, I believe would very readily inform you, and Governor Pownal, who is well acquainted with that Minister, has so much Humanity and Friendship for America, as to introduce you to him if you desire it. … I believe I may venture to give you Leave to make Use of my Name to either of those Personages. If you were here, I would introduce you to the Baron de Schultz von Ascheraden, the Envoy, of his Sweedish Majesty, to their High Mightinesses, but I think it would save you the Expence, and Trouble of travelling to apply to the Sweedish Ambassador in London, for Information. It is a matter of Importance, Delicacy, and Difficulty, and I should advise you to write to Dr: Franklin and Mr: 71 72 Jay upon the Subject if you cannot Obtain Satisfaction in London.2 They may consult the Sweedish and Danish Ministers at Versailles. I could do the same, with those of the same Powers, at the Hague, but as Congress have joined Mr: Franklin Mr: Jay and myself together in most of their Affairs in Europe, I should not think it prudent in me, to take any step but in Concert with those Ministers.3

I think the advice of my Friend Mr: Chase, against taking the Oaths of Allegiance, prudent, at least untill the Members of the Church in America, shall have digested some Plan, for their future Government. Perhaps Parliament may Authorize, some Bishop in England to ordain American Candidates without administering the oaths— The Bishop of St: Asaph I believe, would give you the best Advice, and perhaps Mr: Benjamin Vaughan could procure you an Introduction to his Lordship—4 I have not the Honour to be known to his Lordship. But Mr: Vaughan, if you shew him this Letter, will I flatter myself, be of Service to you.

With much Respect &c.

LbC in JQA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr: Mason Weems.”; APM Reel 107.

1.

Weems’ undated letter at [ca. 27 Feb.], above, was enclosed in Joshua Johnson’s of 27 Feb. (Adams Papers), for which see note 1 to Weems’ letter.

2.

There is no indication that Weems wrote to John Jay, but on 9 July he and Edward Gant of Maryland, later chaplain of the U.S. Senate, wrote to Benjamin Franklin asking his advice on taking orders in France, noting that although JA suggested they go to Denmark, the orders there were not equivalent to Anglican orders. Franklin replied on 18 July that ordination in France would be impracticable unless they became Catholics and advised them that either they should turn to the Church of Ireland or the church in America should create its own bishops independent of England (PPAmP:Franklin Papers; DLC:Franklin Papers; Franklin, Writings , 9:238).

3.

JA did, however, contact Armand François Louis de Mestral de Saint Saphorin, the Danish envoy to the Netherlands. For JA’s letter to the Danish envoy of 21 April and that to Weems the following day, see his letter to Congress of 22 April, and note 2, below. Weems replied to JA on 14 May, below, indicating his intention of going to Denmark.

4.

The bishop of St. Asaph, Jonathan Shipley, had long supported the American cause and, as a member of the House of Lords, voted against the Massachusetts Government Act of 1774 (vol. 2:256).