Papers of John Adams, volume 16

John Adams to Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje, 16 February 1785 Adams, John Willink, Van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje
To Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje
Gentlemen. Auteuil near Paris Feby: 16. 1785.

I have received your favour of the 6th: of January and that of the second of February and am much obliged to you for the particular Account of the State of the Cash and Obligations in your Hands. By all that I have learnt from your Letters, as well as by Enquiry in Conversation it seems to be so possible and indeed so probable, that the United States might be exposed to a loss of several hundred Thousand Guilders, by a sudden fall of the Agio, that I have not been able to resolve upon giving you Directions to put the Cash on 525 Hand into the Bank, especially as I have every Day expected, and still expect, not only the Ratification of the last Loan, but Orders from Congress, or their Commissioners of the Treasury what to do with the whole Sum.

I still expect every moment, to receive the Orders of Congress, and therefore shall not venture as yet to give orders for putting the Money into the Bank. But as you are on the Spot, and are better informed, than I am, I must leave it to your Judgments to do what you shall think most for the Interest of the United States, either by putting the whole, or a Part, or none of the Money into the Bank.

But, Gentlemen, let me above all Things recommend it to you, to keep the Congress constantly informed of the State of their Affairs in your Hands. You may address your Letters either to the President, his Excellency, Richard Henry Lee Esqr, or to the Office, of Finance; Perhaps it would be best to address Duplicates, one to the President and the other to the Commissioners of the Treasury.

I thank you, Gentlemen, for what you say about my Salary: But would it not be a saving for me, to draw Bills upon you and sell them here? as to an Indemnification to my for “my Troubles and Hardships” I have no Idea of asking, or even wishing for such a Thing. exclusive of all these, it would require a larger Sum, perhaps, than you imagine to indemnify me for my Losses. This too I neither expect nor desire. indeed while the War continued and all was at Stake, I never thought about Trouble, Hardships, Losses, or savings. But as Peace is made and Danger to the Public is no more, I should think myself bound to Oeconomy for the sake of my Family if I were not necessitated to it, in order to pay, my daily Expences, as at present I am literally.

With much Esteem &c—

LbC in JQA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Messrs: W: & J. Willink. / N & J. van Staphorst / & De la Lande & Fynje—”; APM Reel 107.

John Adams to Charles Sigourney, 17 February 1785 Adams, John Sigourney, Charles
To Charles Sigourney
Sir Auteuil Feb 17 1785

I have received your favour of 21 Decr. and congratulate you on your arrival, My health which you are so obliging as to inquire after is so much better than it has generally been for the four last years, that I begin to hope I Shall get the better of those obstinate 526 Disorders with which you saw me tormented in Holland. My family, is I thank God in perfect Health

we have no commercial Treaty with England nor do I see any Prospect of any. the Court of London declines Treating in any other place than at home—or Perhaps in America, and Probably will decline sending an Ambassador to Congress, untill that August Assembly Shall send one to them, and there are reasons which have hitherto discouraged Congress from sending; how long these reasons will continue I know not, much too long I fear for the good of either Country, I wish that too nice notions of Etiquette or the little Feelings of ill humour may not on both sides prevail over considerations of lasting Interest and Prosperity.1

The British Ministry Should know that we cannot continue to Trade, but in proportion as we are able to pay, and that by excluding our articles of Remittance, they will soon exclude our Purchasers if our Oil cannot be allowed the Honour of Enlightening London we must endeavour to procure it an opportunity of illuminating Paris, and other Cities.

My regards to Mr Rogers and his family & / Mr Bromfeild,2

With much esteem I am sir your most / obedient. &c

LbC in AA2’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr Charles Sigourney / at Mr Rogerss. Moor Place / Moor Fields London—”; APM Reel 107. This is the first instance in which AA2 acted as JA’s secretary.

1.

For the effect of JA’s comments regarding the possibility of Anglo-American negotiations in this letter, see Charles Storer’s 22 March letter, note 2, below.

2.

Daniel Dennison Rogers and his brother-in-law Henry Bromfield Jr. were merchants and originally from Boston. Bromfield previously had been part of the Amsterdam mercantile firm of Sigourney, Ingraham & Bromfield. AA became a close friend of Rogers’ wife, Abigail Bromfield Rogers, following the Adamses’ move to London later in the year (vol. 10:98; AFC , 7:xi, 75).