Papers of John Adams, volume 16

Ratification of the Second Dutch Loan, 1 February 1785 Lee, Richard Henry
Ratification of the Second Dutch Loan
Duplicate [1 February 1785]1

Be it remembered that the within Contract or engagement entered into by the Honourable John Adams Esquire Minister Plenipotentiary of the United states of America to their High Mightinesses the Lords—the States General of the United Netherlands, in behalf of the said states with Messieurs Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob Van Staphorst and de la Lande & Fynje and their Successors and assignees for a Loan of Two Millions of Guilders dated at the Hague, March the ninth 1784 hath been read in Congress, approved and ratified and declared obligatory on the United States of America.—

Done in the City Hall in the City of New York by the United States in Congress assembled this first day of February in the Year 512 of our Lord One thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty five, and in the Ninth Year of our Sovereignty and Independence.—

Richard Henry Lee. P. Cha Thomson secy:

Dupl (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Ratification 1. Feb. 1785 / of / my Loan of 9. March 1784.” Tripl (Adams Papers). Both filmed at [9 March 1784].

1.

The contract, to which this instrument of ratification was attached, is at [9 March 1784], above. For the arrival of the original ratification, the duplicate printed here, and a triplicate, see John Jay’s letter of 11 Feb. 1785, below.

The almost eleven-month delay between the contract’s signing and notarization and its ratification was owing to a variety of circumstances. Congress knew of JA’s new loan by early May 1784, when it received Robert Morris’ letter of 4 May wherein he announced the new loan, disclosed its terms, and indicated that the consortium had opened it on 18 Feb. (from the consortium, 16 Feb., note 2, above). The consortium, however, did not dispatch copies of the signed, notarized contract until sometime in mid-March, and then they were presumably addressed to Morris rather than to Congress. When Morris received the contracts, he apparently enclosed them in a letter dated 30 Sept., his final day as superintendant of finance. By then, however, Congress had adjourned and its day-to-day business was being overseen by the Committee of the States. Not until 1 Dec., after Congress had reconvened at Trenton, N.J., was Morris’ letter entered in its dispatch book, and, owing to the turmoil caused by Congress’ move from Trenton to New York City, where it met in early Jan. 1785, nothing was done about the contracts until 17 January. Then a grand committee was formed to consider Morris’ letter of 30 Sept. 1784 (misidentified in the Journals of Congress as being of 30 Aug.). It reported on 1 Feb. 1785 and offered the resolution contained in the instrument of ratification (from Wilhem & Jan Willink, 9 March 1784, above; Morris, Papers , 9:536–537; PCC, No. 185, III, f. 104; JCC , 28:5, 27–28).

Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje to John Adams, 2 February 1785 Willink, Van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje Adams, John
From Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje
Sir Amsterdam the 2d. Feb. 1785

Last week we have received your much esteem’d Favour of 10 January, and observed with much pleasure your Satisfaction on the flourishing State of the Treasury of the United States into our Hands. Your Excellency desires our Opinion, whether the Prospect of making new Loans for the Congress would be favorable. In answer to this we heartily Wish that we may not very Soon be charged to try it, and that before it may become necessary, Congress may be put in the Situation, by a unanimous Consentment of all the American States of the Confoederation, to point out a Sufficient Fund for the punctual payment of the Capital and Intrest, which as you know has not been the Case with the two first Loans, and which at present would absolutely be required, because People in this Country knows that the States have not agreed upon this capital Point. a 513 Circumstance that certainly occasions that the Credit of the United States cannot be carried to the Point, which we believe it deserves in consequence of the inward Solidity, and promising Prospect of the Sources of her welfare. Besides this we are daily questioned about the Ratification of the last Loan, and we are at a loss what we shall Answer, having not received any Letters from the Office of Finance since the Time, when Mr. Morris resign’d.

But Sir, whenever our wishes in these points Should be fullfilled, which certainly would Strenghen greatly the American Credit, we should not advise to try another Loan for some Time, because we know that a great Number of Bonds of both of the former remain still into the Hands of the Undertakers, which as you know is the Second Hand, and there is no great prospect that they’ll Sell their Shares so soon, on occasion that we have every day new Loans opened here, as for instance one of 7 Millions in favor of the East India Company, one of twelve hundred thousd. florins for the States of Zeeland, one of two Millions for Sweden, and we expect every day a Loan for our Province; added to this, large Sums are employed in the french Loan, and you’ll easily conclude that Money becomes very Scarce, which we hope will not be the Case next Year, and if then Congres might wish to pay off the Loans in France, and raise the Money in this Country, it would give us much Pleasure to give her again Satisfaction with our Endeavours, and at the Same Time to observe an unlimited Confidence with our Countrymen.

We observe Sir, what you are pleased to mention about the Commission, which our Bankers charge upon the Sums, which they pay you on account of your Salary. It is our Opinion that properly this Commission should be bonified by Congress, and even that they indemnified your Excellency for the Trouble and Hardships you had on their behalf, would not be amiss. But it being out of our Line to decide any Thing of that kind, we’ll only Say that in case the Said Commission is Charged by Congress to your account, we will in future give such orders that you’ll have no reason to complain about it. We beg to return our Compliments to your worthy Family and remain most sincerely / Sir / Your most humble & Obedt. Servts.

Wilhem & Jan Willink Nics. & Jacob van Staphorst. de la Lande & Fÿnje

We had the honour of addressing us the 6 Jany., to your Excelly. with a full information of the Sums of money and of the Obligations 514 in the hands of each of the Houses, and continuing with your reply, we are in hope of receiving in Short your answer abt. it.

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Messrs Willinks &c. / 2 Fev. ansd 16. 1785.”