Papers of John Adams, volume 16

John Adams to Samuel Adams, 25 June 1784 Adams, John Adams, Samuel
To Samuel Adams
Dear Sir The Hague June 25. 1784

I have this morning received your Favours of the 16 & 17 of April,1 and am fully with you in Sentiment, that “the Sooner a commercial Treaty is settled with the English, the better,” but you must be Sensible that no Treaty can be made untill Somebody or other, one or more, are authorized by Congress. While every British Minister is dancing on a slack Rope and afraid of every popular Wind, least it Should blow him over, he will never dare to treat with any Persons who are not regularly authorised, any more than he will dare to refuse or neglect to treat with Such as may be so. Mr Jay and Mr Laurens are gone home, which will change the Plans of Congress and We must now wait, probably till next Spring for Powers. We can never know what England will do untill We try her. But I am afraid our only Remedy and final Resource must be a Navigation Act, and whether the southern States will ever agree to this, I know not.

I am as much afraid of District & state Conventions and of the Cincinnati, as you are, and hope they will be laid aside: The last 248 which is an order of Chivalry, and more, will have many very unhappy Effects, besides exciting Contests and Dissentions if not relinquished or suppressed.

In Answer to the Questions of Dr Noyes and Captn. Dashwood I am almost afraid to say any Thing, as so many of my poor opinions have been indiscreetly quoted.— I know no more of this matter than the Gentlemen who ask the Question.— The British Finances are so oppressed, that I have Small Faith in their Compensations even to any of the Refugees. Yet this ought not to prevent Dr Noyes and Capt. Dashwood from taking any Measures in their Power. They may transmit their Demands to England into the Hands of any Friend or Agent, but I Should have Small Confidence in the success.

Never in my Life, was I so much at a Loss, what Course to Steer, as Since the Peace.— I thought and asked Leave to go home. Congress, on the contrary resolved to send a Comn. to me & two others F. & J. to treat with England. I concluded to stay and wrote for my Wife. But neither the Commission nor the Wife arrive. Jay is gone, yet I every moment expect my Wife will come So that I cant go home.— and I see no Possibility now of any Commission arriving before next Spring.— The only Thing that remains for me is to stay here at the Hague, and wait with Patience the moving of Waters which are as slow and stagnant as the Dutch Canals.

The Treaty with England is important, to all and especially for New England. I would therefore neglect nothing in my Power. But I have none. Congress must push and force the British Ministry, and this in my Opinion is not impossible nor difficult to be done.— The People of England would do the Work if Congress once sends a Full Power. But nobody can do it without the Authority of the United states. For my own Tranquility Satisfaction and Interest I had rather be here, than at Paris or London But I cannot do much for the publick here. nor indeed do I know that I could in either of those Places. associated with Franklin alone it is probable I should be able to do less at Paris than here.

I anxiously wait the Arrival of my Wife, from whom I may learn Something to determine me.

Your Frd & sert

John Adams

RC (NN:George Bancroft Coll.); internal address: “Hon. Samuel Adams.”; endorsed: “John Adams / Hague June 25 1784.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 107.

249 1.

For Samuel Adams’ 17 April letter (Adams Papers) concerning the efforts of Dr. Nathaniel Noyes and Capt. Samuel Dashwood to obtain compensation for losses during the British occupation of Boston, see his letter of 16 April, note 1, above.

Thomas Barclay to John Adams, 25 June 1784 Barclay, Thomas Adams, John
From Thomas Barclay
Dear Sir Paris 25th. June 1784—

I received your letter by the Post and Express almost at the same time.1 Your things went away last Night at Eleven o’Clock, and Inclosed I send you an Account of them.2 It shou’d have gone by the Express but it was Very late before the affair was finish’d, and he will shew you a Duplicate of it— I Packed your Two Trunks Myself, and if they do not meet with any Interuption at the Barriers they will Pass to you I Expect in good order which I shall be glad to hear.—

I Received with the Bills of Exchange a List of—169 Bills amounting to ƒ.186472 which you mention to have received from Mess: Fezeaux some time ago. But of the other Bills which Accompanied them viz 375 amounting to ƒ . 290780 2/3d— there was No list, Therefore I send you a General Receipt for the whole viz—544 Bills of Exchange amount 477252 2/3 Florins—Say Five hundred and forty four Bills amount Four Hundred and seventy seven thousand, two hundred fifty two and two thirds Florins—which agrees with the Contents of your letter, and with the Vouchers—

I have furnishd the Superintendent of Finance with the Account by way of England,3 and if you Incline to have Receipts in any other Form from what I send, let Me know and your Directions shall be Only Complied with, I shall answer the other parts of your letter Very soon, and Remain with great Respect and Esteem / Dear Sir / Your Obed & Very / Hum. Serv

Thos Barclay

I shall send you the Receipt Next Post. the post for this day is Just going—4

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency / John Adams Esqr. / Hague”; endorsed: “Mr Barclay / 25. June 1784.”

1.

JA’s letter by post was that of 11 June, above. For the express, which carried JA’s letter of 28 May as well as the bills of exchange, see the 11 June letter and Jan Willink’s of 10 June, above.

2.

The enclosed inventory of JA’s effects sent off by Barclay has not been found.

3.

For the “Account” that Barclay sent to 250 Robert Morris, see his account of bills of exchange drawn on John Adams and Henry Laurens, 22 June, above.

4.

The postscript was written vertically in the left margin.