Papers of John Adams, volume 16

John Adams to Samuel Adams, 4 May 1784 Adams, John Adams, Samuel
To Samuel Adams
Dear Sir The Hague May 4. 1784.1

Your advice “to reconcile myself to the Thought that Justice may not be done me, till I am dead” is friendly. I am not however apprehensive of Injustice living or dead. I am not ambitious of a Reputation for great Talents or Splendid Actions, with the present Age or with Posterity. The great Anxiety of my Life, has been to do my Duty and avoid just Reproach. and I know very well, that my Life has been passed at such a remote Distance, from every bad Principle and foul Course that no Authority will be credited, which may be so abandond as to ascribe to me, any Thing very vicious or very vile. When you Say that “while I live, I Shall probably be the Object of Envy,” you flatter me, because that Envy is the best Testimony that the Envious can give of their Sense of a Mans Merit.— I do not think that Envy Strictly Speaking abounds in the World. Many are falsely accused of Envy. Indignation against successfull Villany, and Contempt of low Cunning or impudent Empiricism, are not Envy, though they are often called so.— In former Parts of my Life, I have made Ennemies, or rather have excited little Resentments by too much Ardour, or by little Incautions or Indiscretions, upon great Occasions but I was never very Sensible that I was envied, but once. My Commission for Peace was envied by one Man and by one only that I knew of, and this dirty Passion, put him upon a series of falseshood, of insidious underhand Maneuvre, and other base Practices, which would tarnish any Reputation whenever or wherever it should be exposed.—2 These Proceedings distressed me, not for myself for I never cared a farthing for any Consequence they could have upon me, but for the Publick, because I saw, that they put to the utmost hazard some of the most important Interests of our Country. and it is a kind of Miracle that they did not finally forfeit Us all our Fish and Fur, and Venison at least.— These are secured, and I am no longer troubled about any Mans Envy or Jealousy.

The Envy and Jealousy alluded to was aided by two Auxiliaries which made it dangerous— one was the Jealousy of the South which cannot bear to see any Character of Consequence, arising in the North, and the other was an Influence, which has betrayed two much Inclination to domineer in our Councils and Negotiations, and therefore has never treated with common Decency any 186 American Character, which would not be a Prostitute.— I Saw, with a Grief and Indignation which no Historian will record, because no Words can express it, the great Council giving way to these 3 Jealousies, and Sacrificing a Man whose Conduct they were necessitated to applaud. But all this is past.

You assign me a Station, which would probably be envied. But I shall probably never be in it, and I assure you, Since I Saw it, I have much less Inclination for it, than I ever had.

There is one certain Way, of getting rid of Envy and that is getting out of envyed Places. This is now, I thank God and ever shall be in my Power. But I will never make Use of this Power from the fear of Envy.— As soon as I shall see, that there is no further Service to be done by me, I can retire with greater Joy than I ever felt upon any Honour that was done me. for my own Gratification I declare to you I had rather be a Select Man of Braintree, than Ambassador to any Court in the World.

RC (NN:George Bancroft Coll.); endorsed: “Letter from John / Adams. dated the / Hague May 4. 1784.”

1.

This is JA’s second reply to Samuel Adams’ letter of 4 Nov. 1783 (vol. 15:341–344). The first is of 1 May 1784, above.

2.

JA refers to his 1779 commission as sole American peace negotiator and, presumably, to Benjamin Franklin.

John Adams to Thomas Barclay, 4 May 1784 Adams, John Barclay, Thomas
To Thomas Barclay
Dear Sir The Hague May 4. 1784

I wrote you the 23 Ult. and expect your Answer by the next Post.1 To Day I have yours of 26 Ult and have executed your orders, by writing to Amsterdam &c2

You require me to produce to you the Bills of Exchange accepted by me, and paid by Fizeau & Co But in this with humble Submission you are wrong.3

Dr Franklin obtained Money of the Court of Versailles Mr Grand of Paris, received it, and paid it out by means of his Friend at Amsterdam Mr Fizeau &c in discharge of these Bills. Mr Grand, in Accounting with you for that Money, will produce those Bills, as his Vouchers. I never recd any Money or paid any Bill. I only examined the Bills by their Marks Numbers, Dates &c to see, if they were genuine, and all this I have given you an Account of. Fizeau who paid the Bills kept them as he ought for his own Vouchers.

There is no Suggestion or Suspicion of any Mistake in these Bills. 187 No Duplicates were ever accepted by me, as you may See by looking over the List I gave you.

The Coach I beg you to take Care of, till my Arrival.

Yours

LbC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Hon. Thomas Barclay.”; APM Reel 107.

1.

Barclay’s reply is dated 6 May, below.

2.

JA wrote to the loan consortium on 4 May requesting that it deliver the letters that Barclay had enclosed in his 26 April letter, above, to the banking firms of Hope & Co. and Jean de Neufville & Fils and obtain their responses as Barclay had requested (LbC, APM Reel 107). The consortium responded on the 5th that it would do so, and on the 11th forwarded the reply from Hope & Co. and indicated that it was awaiting that from the Neufville firm (both Adams Papers).

3.

See the 4 May letter to Fizeaux, Grand & Co., below.